Countries and gun deaths

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
May 20, 2009
146,661
69,797
2,330
Progressive "Democratic" China: 60,000,000
Progressive USSR: 25,000,000 (not including 3 million children and 3 million adults starved to death by Democrat hero and Progressive Founding father "Uncle Joe")
Socialist Germany under Hitler: 10,000,000
Progressive Cambodia: 2,000,000
Progressive Cuba, etc

Progressive governments are the leading causes of gun deaths
 
Can we conclude from this that some leftists are okay with governments using guns for murder, but not so with citizens using guns for murder?
 
Everything dies around progressives.

10 Poorest Cities in America (How did it happen?)

City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level

1. Detroit , MI 32.5%
2. Buffalo , NY 29.9%
3. Cincinnati , OH 27.8%
4. Cleveland , OH 27.0%
5. Miami , FL 26.9%
5. St. Louis , MO 26.8%
7. El Paso , TX 26.4%
8. Milwaukee , WI 26.2%
9. Philadelphia , PA 25.1%
10. Newark , NJ 24.2%

What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common?

Detroit, MI - (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961
Buffalo, NY - (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954
Cincinnati, OH - (3rd) not since 1984
Cleveland, OH - (4th) not since 1989
Miami, FL - (5th) has never had a Republican mayor
St. Louis, MO - (6th) not since 1949
El Paso, TX - (7th) has never had a Republican mayor
Milwaukee, WI - (8th) not since 1908
Philadelphia, PA - (9th) not since 1952
Newark, NJ - (10th) not since 1907

Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.'

It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats....... Yet they are still POOR.
 
Everything dies around progressives.

10 Poorest Cities in America (How did it happen?)

City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level

1. Detroit , MI 32.5%
2. Buffalo , NY 29.9%
3. Cincinnati , OH 27.8%
4. Cleveland , OH 27.0%
5. Miami , FL 26.9%
5. St. Louis , MO 26.8%
7. El Paso , TX 26.4%
8. Milwaukee , WI 26.2%
9. Philadelphia , PA 25.1%
10. Newark , NJ 24.2%

What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common?

Detroit, MI - (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961
Buffalo, NY - (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954
Cincinnati, OH - (3rd) not since 1984
Cleveland, OH - (4th) not since 1989
Miami, FL - (5th) has never had a Republican mayor
St. Louis, MO - (6th) not since 1949
El Paso, TX - (7th) has never had a Republican mayor
Milwaukee, WI - (8th) not since 1908
Philadelphia, PA - (9th) not since 1952
Newark, NJ - (10th) not since 1907

Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.'

It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats....... Yet they are still POOR.
Go back to say 1950 and you will find that all those cities were flourishing. Detroit lead the nation in per capita income for decades...then liberal Ds showed up.

I wonder why this is not taught in the p-schools.:uhoh3::uhoh3::uhoh3::uhh::uhh::uhh:o_Oo_Oo_O
 
I got as far as socialist germany under hitler. If you tell lies that big then there's not point in reading any more.
 
I got as far as socialist germany under hitler. If you tell lies that big then there's not point in reading any more.
Well the difference between Socialism and National Socialism, isn't very much.
 
I got as far as socialist germany under hitler. If you tell lies that big then there's not point in reading any more.
Well the difference between Socialism and National Socialism, isn't very much.

Yes it is. It's enourmous. In all but a few minor areas its polar opposite.
That is laughable and shows an inability to recognize reality.

Both systems in practice (not in a textbook LOL) are nearly the same. It is elitism on steroids leading to enormous mass murder and terrible suffering.
 
I got as far as socialist germany under hitler. If you tell lies that big then there's not point in reading any more.
You think Hitler was a big supporter of individual freedom and Liberty?

That's Libertarian.
Hitler was a Right-Wing Socialist. (Socially far more right-wing, but economically much more Socialist)
 
I got as far as socialist germany under hitler. If you tell lies that big then there's not point in reading any more.
Well the difference between Socialism and National Socialism, isn't very much.

Yes it is. It's enourmous. In all but a few minor areas its polar opposite.
That is laughable and shows an inability to recognize reality.

Both systems in practice (not in a textbook LOL) are nearly the same. It is elitism on steroids leading to enormous mass murder and terrible suffering.

You say "in practice" when you mean "in my opinion"
 
I got as far as socialist germany under hitler. If you tell lies that big then there's not point in reading any more.
Well the difference between Socialism and National Socialism, isn't very much.

Nazis were Nationalistic Socialists, so actually the term National Socialist was most fitting.

North Korea is democratic. It says so in the name.
...and you believe.
 
I got as far as socialist germany under hitler. If you tell lies that big then there's not point in reading any more.
You think Hitler was a big supporter of individual freedom and Liberty?

That's Libertarian.
Hitler was a Right-Wing Socialist. (Socially far more right-wing, but economically much more Socialist)

Really? Are you saying socialism leads to economic success? Because Nazi Germany turned a country that was flkat broke in to a near world beating economic superpower in a decade.
 
I got as far as socialist germany under hitler. If you tell lies that big then there's not point in reading any more.
Well the difference between Socialism and National Socialism, isn't very much.

Yes it is. It's enourmous. In all but a few minor areas its polar opposite.
That is laughable and shows an inability to recognize reality.

Both systems in practice (not in a textbook LOL) are nearly the same. It is elitism on steroids leading to enormous mass murder and terrible suffering.

You say "in practice" when you mean "in my opinion"
Again that clearly indicates a lack of knowledge.
 

Forum List

Back
Top