Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you even understand the science? Do you know why there's a concern about CO2? IMO, you're just parroting what others have told you and don't have a clue about the basics.
"Hard lefter" challenging you to prove you're not an ignorant boob.
Rather than changes in earth's CO2 causing temperature to change, scientists have actually found that changes in earth's temperatures always precedes changes in CO2 by 400 to a 1000 years -- just the opposite of what global warming proponents would have us believe.
What happens to the energy that CO2 absorbs? You didn't answer the question. You just proved my point. You'll parrot anything that fits your bias.
To all my peers, there you go, Jiminie admitting that all leftwingers think the same. haahhahahahahhahahaa which goes to show they don't think at all.That's the biggest collection of shite I've seen in many a moon. BTW, you've got your quote attributions fucked up. You've got yourself claiming to be a leftwinger. As a leftwinger myself, I have to stand up and say it isn't so.
On the point, oft repeated by those of your intellectual milieu, that CO2 has always followed heating in the past - are you aware that no one in mainstream science, among climate scientists or the educated public has the SLIGHTEST disagreement with that point?
Are you aware what an idiot you look claiming that the point refutes AGW in any way whatsoever? This has been explained to you over and over and over again. How can you not get it? There were no humans putting CO2 into the atmosphere in the distant past. Today there is. In that regard, the situation is unprecedented.
There have been times when CO2 levels were driven upward by means other than temperature increases: The KT impact, the eruption of the Deccan traps, the Great Dying of the Permian-Triassic extinction event. All such events led to dramatic temperature increases which FOLLOWED the CO2/methane increases. Jeremy Shakun's work on global proxies from the first half of the Holocene clearly show that CO2 released by Milankovitch Cycle warming eventually took over the role of primary driver for further warming.
If you'd like to stop looking like such an idiot, a good first step would be to cease and desist claiming that this means anything and that anyone is attempting to suppress knowledge of those events or of the significance of water vapor and methane in global warming. Really. You couldn't make yourself look more stupid if you tried.
According to the ruling, the science of the law suite and the specific points of contention were never addressed. It simply states the court found "NO HARM" could have been had yet from the unlawful changes as they had not just yet been enacted.. (The Court held; Plaintiffs had no standing for the suit at this time as they have not suffered harm.)deniers and their frivolous lawsuits.
That's the biggest collection of shite I've seen in many a moon. BTW, you've got your quote attributions fucked up. You've got yourself claiming to be a leftwinger. As a leftwinger myself, I have to stand up and say it isn't so.
On the point, oft repeated by those of your intellectual milieu, that CO2 has always followed heating in the past - are you aware that no one in mainstream science, among climate scientists or the educated public has the SLIGHTEST disagreement with that point?
Are you aware what an idiot you look claiming that the point refutes AGW in any way whatsoever? This has been explained to you over and over and over again. How can you not get it? There were no humans putting CO2 into the atmosphere in the distant past. Today there is. In that regard, the situation is unprecedented.
There have been times when CO2 levels were driven upward by means other than temperature increases: The KT impact, the eruption of the Deccan traps, the Great Dying of the Permian-Triassic extinction event. All such events led to dramatic temperature increases which FOLLOWED the CO2/methane increases. Jeremy Shakun's work on global proxies from the first half of the Holocene clearly show that CO2 released by Milankovitch Cycle warming eventually took over the role of primary driver for further warming.
If you'd like to stop looking like such an idiot, a good first step would be to cease and desist claiming that this means anything and that anyone is attempting to suppress knowledge of those events or of the significance of water vapor and methane in global warming. Really. You couldn't make yourself look more stupid if you tried.
To all my peers, there you go, Jiminie admitting that all leftwingers think the same. haahhahahahahhahahaa which goes to show they don't think at all.
Jiminie, thanks for the continued laugh of the day presedence that you started.You certainly are entertaining. A k00k besides.
Of all the carbon emitted into the atmosphere each year, 210 billion tons are from natural sources, and only 6.3 billion tons are from man's activity. Man's burning of fossil fuel, therefore only accounts for 3 percent of total emissions of CO2..
Of all the carbon emitted into the atmosphere each year, 210 billion tons are from natural sources, and only 6.3 billion tons are from man's activity. Man's burning of fossil fuel, therefore only accounts for 3 percent of total emissions of CO2..
You posted a lot of graphs, but I didn't see any cites. For the real story go here:
Present-day CO2 emissions from volcanos - Gerlach - 2006 - Eos Transactions American Geophysical Union - Wiley Online Library and here:
Volcano Hazards Program
Although the initial carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of the young Earth was produced by volcanic activity, modern volcanic activity releases only 130 to 230 megatonnes of carbon dioxide each year, which is less than 1% of the amount released by human activities (at approximately 29 gigatonnes).
Carbon dioxide in Earth s atmosphere - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
That's the biggest collection of shite I've seen in many a moon. BTW, you've got your quote attributions fucked up. You've got yourself claiming to be a leftwinger. As a leftwinger myself, I have to stand up and say it isn't so.
On the point, oft repeated by those of your intellectual milieu, that CO2 has always followed heating in the past - are you aware that no one in mainstream science, among climate scientists or the educated public has the SLIGHTEST disagreement with that point?
Are you aware what an idiot you look claiming that the point refutes AGW in any way whatsoever? This has been explained to you over and over and over again. How can you not get it? There were no humans putting CO2 into the atmosphere in the distant past. Today there is. In that regard, the situation is unprecedented.
There have been times when CO2 levels were driven upward by means other than temperature increases: The KT impact, the eruption of the Deccan traps, the Great Dying of the Permian-Triassic extinction event. All such events led to dramatic temperature increases which FOLLOWED the CO2/methane increases. Jeremy Shakun's work on global proxies from the first half of the Holocene clearly show that CO2 released by Milankovitch Cycle warming eventually took over the role of primary driver for further warming.
If you'd like to stop looking like such an idiot, a good first step would be to cease and desist claiming that this means anything and that anyone is attempting to suppress knowledge of those events or of the significance of water vapor and methane in global warming. Really. You couldn't make yourself look more stupid if you tried.
That's the biggest collection of shite I've seen in many a moon. BTW, you've got your quote attributions fucked up. You've got yourself claiming to be a leftwinger. As a leftwinger myself, I have to stand up and say it isn't so.
On the point, oft repeated by those of your intellectual milieu, that CO2 has always followed heating in the past - are you aware that no one in mainstream science, among climate scientists or the educated public has the SLIGHTEST disagreement with that point?
Are you aware what an idiot you look claiming that the point refutes AGW in any way whatsoever? This has been explained to you over and over and over again. How can you not get it? There were no humans putting CO2 into the atmosphere in the distant past. Today there is. In that regard, the situation is unprecedented.
There have been times when CO2 levels were driven upward by means other than temperature increases: The KT impact, the eruption of the Deccan traps, the Great Dying of the Permian-Triassic extinction event. All such events led to dramatic temperature increases which FOLLOWED the CO2/methane increases. Jeremy Shakun's work on global proxies from the first half of the Holocene clearly show that CO2 released by Milankovitch Cycle warming eventually took over the role of primary driver for further warming.
If you'd like to stop looking like such an idiot, a good first step would be to cease and desist claiming that this means anything and that anyone is attempting to suppress knowledge of those events or of the significance of water vapor and methane in global warming. Really. You couldn't make yourself look more stupid if you tried.
Every word of this is true and nothing you numbskulls have said has thrown the slightest doubt on the matter.