Crimea will be rendered “uninhabitable”!

[GLASNOST]

That according to professor Francis Fukuyama, a world-renowned American philosopher and researcher in politics and international relations. Oh my! The end of Russian dominance in Europe is nigh for sure! It's over! Here is the full-proof plan to send the Russia running with their collective tail between their legs:

 

[Rigby5]

That according to professor Francis Fukuyama, a world-renowned American philosopher and researcher in politics and international relations. Oh my! The end of Russian dominance in Europe is nigh for sure! It's over! Here is the full-proof plan to send the Russia running with their collective tail between their legs:

Wrong.
The Ukraine is a fake country created by the Treaty of Versailles, in order to punish the Bolshevik revolution.
Kyiv used to be the capital of Russia before the Mongol invasion of 1200 forced the Russians to move their capital further north, to Moscow.
The US bribed the ethnic Polish generals in Kyiv to start this war by treaty violations, like trying to join NATO.

 

[GLASNOST]

Wrong. ........

You don't say?

The Ukraine is a fake country ........

Ya' think?

........ The US bribed the ethnic Polish generals in Kyiv to start this war by treaty violations, like trying to join NATO.

This is too much truth and fact for one post.

 

[luiza]

This jerk was complicit in establishing the neocons initially, though backed off when he saw how that would affect his career .
To show how mistaken he is , glance at his thoughts immediately post Februay 24 , 2022
Always gets it 100% wrong:-

• Russia was heading towards defeat, with its planning being incompetent and based on flawed assumptions about Ukrainians being favorable to Russia and about the Ukrainian military suffering immediate collapse in an invasion scenario. "Russian soldiers were evidently carrying dress uniforms for their victory parade in Kyiv rather than extra ammo and rations." The bulk of Russia's military had been committed to the invasion and so there were no vast reserves available to it.
• Russia's position could collapse suddenly and catastrophically rather than through a slow war of attrition. Its army would reach a point where it could be neither resupplied nor withdrawn, and morale would collapse accordingly.
• A Russian defeat was a prerequisite for any diplomatic solution to the war as otherwise both Russia and Ukraine's losses meant that there was no conceivable compromise which they could both accept.
• Vladimir Putin's rule over Russia would not survive a military defeat. "He gets support because he is perceived to be a strongman; what does he have to offer once he demonstrates incompetence and is stripped of his coercive power?"
• The invasion had done huge damage to populists such as Matteo Salvini, Jair Bolsonaro, Éric Zemmour, Marine Le Pen, Viktor Orbán, and Donald Trump; all had expressed sympathy for Putin before the war, and their "openly authoritarian" leanings had been exposed by the war's politics.
• The war thus far had been a "good lesson" for China whose military, like Russia's, was technologically sophisticated but had minimal combat experience. The People's Liberation Army Air Force's lack of experience in relation to complex air operations meant that in a future conflict it would likely replicate the poor performance of Russia's air force. "We may hope that the Chinese leadership will not delude itself as to its own capabilities the way the Russians did when contemplating a future move against Taiwan"; as for Taiwan itself, Fukuyama expressed his hope that it would now begin to prepare for a future conflict including by reintroducing conscription.
• "Turkish drones will become bestsellers".
• A Russian defeat would permit a "new birth of freedom" and assuage fears about the declining state of global democracy. The spirit of 1989 would live on thanks to Ukraine's bravery.

His surname should be Fukume aand not Fukuyama

 

[GLASNOST]

This jerk was complicit in establishing the neocons initially, though backed off when he saw how that would affect his career .
To show how mistaken he is , glance at his thoughts immediately post Februay 24 , 2022
Always gets it 100% wrong:-

• Russia was heading towards defeat, with its planning being incompetent and based on flawed assumptions about Ukrainians being favorable to Russia and about the Ukrainian military suffering immediate collapse in an invasion scenario. "Russian soldiers were evidently carrying dress uniforms for their victory parade in Kyiv rather than extra ammo and rations." The bulk of Russia's military had been committed to the invasion and so there were no vast reserves available to it.
• Russia's position could collapse suddenly and catastrophically rather than through a slow war of attrition. Its army would reach a point where it could be neither resupplied nor withdrawn, and morale would collapse accordingly.
• A Russian defeat was a prerequisite for any diplomatic solution to the war as otherwise both Russia and Ukraine's losses meant that there was no conceivable compromise which they could both accept.
• Vladimir Putin's rule over Russia would not survive a military defeat. "He gets support because he is perceived to be a strongman; what does he have to offer once he demonstrates incompetence and is stripped of his coercive power?"
• The invasion had done huge damage to populists such as Matteo Salvini, Jair Bolsonaro, Éric Zemmour, Marine Le Pen, Viktor Orbán, and Donald Trump; all had expressed sympathy for Putin before the war, and their "openly authoritarian" leanings had been exposed by the war's politics.
• The war thus far had been a "good lesson" for China whose military, like Russia's, was technologically sophisticated but had minimal combat experience. The People's Liberation Army Air Force's lack of experience in relation to complex air operations meant that in a future conflict it would likely replicate the poor performance of Russia's air force. "We may hope that the Chinese leadership will not delude itself as to its own capabilities the way the Russians did when contemplating a future move against Taiwan"; as for Taiwan itself, Fukuyama expressed his hope that it would now begin to prepare for a future conflict including by reintroducing conscription.
• "Turkish drones will become bestsellers".
• A Russian defeat would permit a "new birth of freedom" and assuage fears about the declining state of global democracy. The spirit of 1989 would live on thanks to Ukraine's bravery.

His surname should be Fukume aand not Fukuyama

Did the idiot say all of that? I think the MIC are using the DEI to "pull the wool". That's their latest ploy.