Crimea will be rendered “uninhabitable”!

GLASNOST

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
17,456
Reaction score
6,450
Points
210
Location
Right here
That according to professor Francis Fukuyama, a world-renowned American philosopher and researcher in politics and international relations. Oh my! The end of Russian dominance in Europe is nigh for sure! It's over! Here is the full-proof plan to send the Russia running with their collective tail between their legs:

 
That according to professor Francis Fukuyama, a world-renowned American philosopher and researcher in politics and international relations. Oh my! The end of Russian dominance in Europe is nigh for sure! It's over! Here is the full-proof plan to send the Russia running with their collective tail between their legs:



Wrong.
The Ukraine is a fake country created by the Treaty of Versailles, in order to punish the Bolshevik revolution.
Kyiv used to be the capital of Russia before the Mongol invasion of 1200 forced the Russians to move their capital further north, to Moscow.
The US bribed the ethnic Polish generals in Kyiv to start this war by treaty violations, like trying to join NATO.
 
This jerk was complicit in establishing the neocons initially, though backed off when he saw how that would affect his career .
To show how mistaken he is , glance at his thoughts immediately post Februay 24 , 2022
Always gets it 100% wrong:-
  • Russia was heading towards defeat, with its planning being incompetent and based on flawed assumptions about Ukrainians being favorable to Russia and about the Ukrainian military suffering immediate collapse in an invasion scenario. "Russian soldiers were evidently carrying dress uniforms for their victory parade in Kyiv rather than extra ammo and rations." The bulk of Russia's military had been committed to the invasion and so there were no vast reserves available to it.
  • Russia's position could collapse suddenly and catastrophically rather than through a slow war of attrition. Its army would reach a point where it could be neither resupplied nor withdrawn, and morale would collapse accordingly.
  • A Russian defeat was a prerequisite for any diplomatic solution to the war as otherwise both Russia and Ukraine's losses meant that there was no conceivable compromise which they could both accept.
  • Vladimir Putin's rule over Russia would not survive a military defeat. "He gets support because he is perceived to be a strongman; what does he have to offer once he demonstrates incompetence and is stripped of his coercive power?"
  • The invasion had done huge damage to populists such as Matteo Salvini, Jair Bolsonaro, Éric Zemmour, Marine Le Pen, Viktor Orbán, and Donald Trump; all had expressed sympathy for Putin before the war, and their "openly authoritarian" leanings had been exposed by the war's politics.
  • The war thus far had been a "good lesson" for China whose military, like Russia's, was technologically sophisticated but had minimal combat experience. The People's Liberation Army Air Force's lack of experience in relation to complex air operations meant that in a future conflict it would likely replicate the poor performance of Russia's air force. "We may hope that the Chinese leadership will not delude itself as to its own capabilities the way the Russians did when contemplating a future move against Taiwan"; as for Taiwan itself, Fukuyama expressed his hope that it would now begin to prepare for a future conflict including by reintroducing conscription.
  • "Turkish drones will become bestsellers".
  • A Russian defeat would permit a "new birth of freedom" and assuage fears about the declining state of global democracy. The spirit of 1989 would live on thanks to Ukraine's bravery.
His surname should be Fukume aand not Fukuyama
 
This jerk was complicit in establishing the neocons initially, though backed off when he saw how that would affect his career .
To show how mistaken he is , glance at his thoughts immediately post Februay 24 , 2022
Always gets it 100% wrong:-
  • Russia was heading towards defeat, with its planning being incompetent and based on flawed assumptions about Ukrainians being favorable to Russia and about the Ukrainian military suffering immediate collapse in an invasion scenario. "Russian soldiers were evidently carrying dress uniforms for their victory parade in Kyiv rather than extra ammo and rations." The bulk of Russia's military had been committed to the invasion and so there were no vast reserves available to it.
  • Russia's position could collapse suddenly and catastrophically rather than through a slow war of attrition. Its army would reach a point where it could be neither resupplied nor withdrawn, and morale would collapse accordingly.
  • A Russian defeat was a prerequisite for any diplomatic solution to the war as otherwise both Russia and Ukraine's losses meant that there was no conceivable compromise which they could both accept.
  • Vladimir Putin's rule over Russia would not survive a military defeat. "He gets support because he is perceived to be a strongman; what does he have to offer once he demonstrates incompetence and is stripped of his coercive power?"
  • The invasion had done huge damage to populists such as Matteo Salvini, Jair Bolsonaro, Éric Zemmour, Marine Le Pen, Viktor Orbán, and Donald Trump; all had expressed sympathy for Putin before the war, and their "openly authoritarian" leanings had been exposed by the war's politics.
  • The war thus far had been a "good lesson" for China whose military, like Russia's, was technologically sophisticated but had minimal combat experience. The People's Liberation Army Air Force's lack of experience in relation to complex air operations meant that in a future conflict it would likely replicate the poor performance of Russia's air force. "We may hope that the Chinese leadership will not delude itself as to its own capabilities the way the Russians did when contemplating a future move against Taiwan"; as for Taiwan itself, Fukuyama expressed his hope that it would now begin to prepare for a future conflict including by reintroducing conscription.
  • "Turkish drones will become bestsellers".
  • A Russian defeat would permit a "new birth of freedom" and assuage fears about the declining state of global democracy. The spirit of 1989 would live on thanks to Ukraine's bravery.
His surname should be Fukume aand not Fukuyama
Did the idiot say all of that? I think the MIC are using the DEI to "pull the wool". That's their latest ploy.
 
In my opinion, China won't let Russia lose. I think China likes the idea of Russia, Europe and the US all weakening themselves by fighting in or financially supporting this stupid war. MAGA
 
Wrong.
The Ukraine is a fake country created by the Treaty of Versailles, in order to punish the Bolshevik revolution.
Kyiv used to be the capital of Russia before the Mongol invasion of 1200 forced the Russians to move their capital further north, to Moscow.
The US bribed the ethnic Polish generals in Kyiv to start this war by treaty violations, like trying to join NATO.
Wrong and a bunch of lies

There was never any such treaty prohibiting Ukraine from joining NATO
 
Kyiv used to be the capital of Russia before the Mongol invasion of 1200 forced the Russians to move their capital further north, to Moscow.
Mongols created Moscow , you sucked to many Ivan´s dicks , you ´d relax and read more academic texts not just RT CRAP PROPAGANDA



Chinese academic Deng Xize : "No more Mongol-Muscovy style empire: Thoughts on the war in Ukraine, The global reaction to the war in Ukraine in fact shows that such empires will no longer be tolerated."​

The Mongol-Muscovy style empire could be defined as a dominating, rapacious empire upheld by violence, especially unruly violence, and exhibiting three prominent characteristics.


First, it uses unruly violence as a regular means of resolving international disputes. While violence is common and sometimes necessary in political or social governance, rules have been set for its use under a modern lawful democratic system. Unlike in ancient times, the use of violence now comes under heavy restrictions and is “predictable”. Such an evolution also applies to international relations.


" modern technology and the international ethical environment led to the inevitable death of the
Mongol-Muscovy empire, while similar empires will no longer come back.





Mongol-empire.webp
 
In my opinion, China won't let Russia lose. I think China likes the idea of Russia, Europe and the US all weakening themselves by fighting in or financially supporting this stupid war. MAGA
You might be right.
 
That according to professor Francis Fukuyama, a world-renowned American philosopher and researcher in politics and international relations. Oh my! The end of Russian dominance in Europe is nigh for sure! It's over! Here is the full-proof plan to send the Russia running with their collective tail between their legs:


Crimea belongs to 🇺🇦 Ukrainians, so ivan the🇷🇺 whore its not your question​

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262

 
I saw the thread title and thought this was going to be another one of Z's banderaite cocaine fueled fantasies.
Instead it's one of Fuckyamama's not much difference. Accuracy and logic have not been a long suit.
 
The Ukraine is a fake country created by the Treaty of Versailles, in order to punish the Bolshevik revolution.
Kyiv used to be the capital of Russia before the Mongol invasion of 1200 forced the Russians to move their capital further north, to Moscow.
Interesting that Ukraine has had its own language for the past 700 years when it diverged from Russian. If they were one country/people you'd expect the languages not to diverge.
 
Back
Top Bottom