Curtis Sliwa plans to crack down on crime as NYC mayor

[Darkwind]

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.

The snag is that far too many Americans of color indeed obey that command immediately and end up with a toe-tag regardless.

The reality is that it happens far less than made out to be. In fact, it is statistically insignificant.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax

Yes, your madeup stat is, though not quite "liberal". Just false.

We know you need it to be so your reality can be made to match what you wish and feel
Very very very few black people die while encountering police. Most self croak like Floyd did. The suspension of reality you operate from makes you feel otherwise but that does not change the stats nor facts

Cute whining. But you made up a bullshit stat and tried to pass it off. Again.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.

When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax

So how do you explain all the videos of that happening? Imagine how many times it's happened without video.

First all police encounters, especially arrests , cannot and should not be pleasant experiences always or even mostly.

And this is the problem, far too many idiots with this type of thinking.

A traffic violation is a minor offense for which the punishment is a fine, not even jail time. So treating people as if they're public enemy number one for a an infraction because the cop is having a bad day or is just an violent, racist asshole is a law enforcement problem.

Don't expect the public to fix their problems, and when you all react the same old way, expect to find yourselves being dealt with in new ways.

Don't want to end-up with your a$$ in a sling, or with a toe-tag?

When you're stopped by police...

1. keep your hands visible at all times
2. obey all police commands
3. shut the phukk up until you're asked to speak
4. be respectful when asked a question
5. don't make excuses - save it for the judge
6. don't run or resist

Whether it's a parking ticket, or a traffic stop, or a car accident, or a suspect-stop, or whether caught-in-the-act red-handed... whatever...

Obey the Six Rules above and you greatly improve your chances of surviving the encounter.,..

Who exactly do you think you are lecturing? You must be cop and if you are, you need to be decertified ASAP, you presumptuous prick.

I never talk to the police without our conversation being recorded, Our state Supreme Court has determined that all police interactions are public therefore they have no expectation of privacy in their dealings with the public. I have a dashcam and usually backup audio and the goal is to get them talking and keep them talking.

If there is any doubt that they may try to take your phone which most people use as their recording device the ACLU has an application that you can install which when activated sends live video stream to the ACLU servers. That way, even if they take your phone or delete the footage from the device, there is still a secure copy stored in the cloud.

I don't kiss anyone's ass, I don't care what their profession is and you might want to think twice before you threaten anyone again with police retribution.

You tell 'em, Spanky... ...it's my fondest hope for you that you try pulling that $hit on the wrong cop, on a dark road...

Keep dreaming asshole

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.

The snag is that far too many Americans of color indeed obey that command immediately and end up with a toe-tag regardless.

The reality is that it happens far less than made out to be. In fact, it is statistically insignificant.

Do you think that maybe it's because they don't collect those statistics? Or at least they didn't prior to approximately 5 years ago?

 

[WEATHER53]

7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax

Yes, your madeup stat is, though not quite "liberal". Just false.

We know you need it to be so your reality can be made to match what you wish and feel
Very very very few black people die while encountering police. Most self croak like Floyd did. The suspension of reality you operate from makes you feel otherwise but that does not change the stats nor facts

Cute whining. But you made up a bullshit stat and tried to pass it off. Again.

Bedtime approaches so nite nite for you little one

 

[basquebromance]

he barely got 3 minutes on hannity tonight

 

[IM2]

Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.

When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax

So how do you explain all the videos of that happening? Imagine how many times it's happened without video.

First all police encounters, especially arrests , cannot and should not be pleasant experiences always or even mostly.

And this is the problem, far too many idiots with this type of thinking.

A traffic violation is a minor offense for which the punishment is a fine, not even jail time. So treating people as if they're public enemy number one for a an infraction because the cop is having a bad day or is just an violent, racist asshole is a law enforcement problem.

Don't expect the public to fix their problems, and when you all react the same old way, expect to find yourselves being dealt with in new ways.

Don't want to end-up with your a$$ in a sling, or with a toe-tag?

When you're stopped by police...

1. keep your hands visible at all times
2. obey all police commands
3. shut the phukk up until you're asked to speak
4. be respectful when asked a question
5. don't make excuses - save it for the judge
6. don't run or resist

Whether it's a parking ticket, or a traffic stop, or a car accident, or a suspect-stop, or whether caught-in-the-act red-handed... whatever...

Obey the Six Rules above and you greatly improve your chances of surviving the encounter.,..

Well kondor the first problem here is that Curtis Sliwa will never be mayor of NYC. As for your 6 rules, we have this document called the constitution that gives us rights. One right is the freedom not be face unreasonable searches and seizures. Police do not have the right to make unlawful demands and we do not have to comply with them.

Police have been acting unconstitutionally for quite some time and they try defending themselves with the claim of qualified immunity. Well guess what, there is not a statute in this country that gives police qualified immunity. So they have been killing and beating people in violation of the law. So you take your six rules and shove them deep in your intestines, because they are invalid.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.

When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax

Your assumption that every police encounter with American citizens is a “violent encounter” is what is the root problem in America today.

American police shoot and kill more than 1000 citizens every year. #1 with a bullet in the first world. The French police are #2 with 26 shootings.

American police are basically escalating citizen encounters until a “suspect” is dead. Like the young man in Colorado dancing down the street on his way home, or the guy sleeping in his car in a Wendy’s parking lot. Or the yoga instructor who called police about a prowler.

We’ve watched the videos. Your cops are out of control.

Your emotions are out of control. Go lie down until your capable of rational thought.

 

[Turtlesoup]

BULLDOG Indiscrimately beating and killing innocent people? WTF are you blabbering about-----the cops for the most part have gone after only criminals and of the idiots who have been killed, their own actions lead to their deaths.

Here's an ideal for you......support the cops so criminals are removed from the street so the criminals will stop victimizing everyone else leading to actual indiscriminate beating and killing of REAL innocent people. Heeeeey...just a thought.

You may want to look up things like what an INNOCENT person is-----hint: usually isn't the person on drugs and/or having a criminal record.

 

[Turtlesoup]

C_Clayton_Jones Oh BS....

 

[Batcat]

If as a cop I had to get liability insurance but couldn’t afford it I would not be proactive or even reactive but instead would chose to do as little as possible to stop violent crime until I could find a different line of work.

 

[badbob85037]

Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.

Here's a better idea...

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.

As we have seen over and over again, obeying a cop’s command will not save your life. In video after video, the police shoot suspects who are obeying police commands.

The issue is not the behaviour of the suspects, the problem is the behaviour of the police. American police or treating citizens like an enemy combatants in the field, instead of people in need of assistance. They must be “neutralized”.

Thank you for allowing the ones of us on the Right a chance to see how the small minds of those on the Left work. A BABY KILLING CHRISTAN WHO WANTS NO POLICE. That's some sound reasoning. Can you give a couple of examples on your 'over and over again'?

 

[Kondor3]

Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.

When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax

So how do you explain all the videos of that happening? Imagine how many times it's happened without video.

First all police encounters, especially arrests , cannot and should not be pleasant experiences always or even mostly.

And this is the problem, far too many idiots with this type of thinking.

A traffic violation is a minor offense for which the punishment is a fine, not even jail time. So treating people as if they're public enemy number one for a an infraction because the cop is having a bad day or is just an violent, racist asshole is a law enforcement problem.

Don't expect the public to fix their problems, and when you all react the same old way, expect to find yourselves being dealt with in new ways.

Don't want to end-up with your a$$ in a sling, or with a toe-tag?

When you're stopped by police...

1. keep your hands visible at all times
2. obey all police commands
3. shut the phukk up until you're asked to speak
4. be respectful when asked a question
5. don't make excuses - save it for the judge
6. don't run or resist

Whether it's a parking ticket, or a traffic stop, or a car accident, or a suspect-stop, or whether caught-in-the-act red-handed... whatever...

Obey the Six Rules above and you greatly improve your chances of surviving the encounter.,..

Well kondor the first problem here is that Curtis Sliwa will never be mayor of NYC. As for your 6 rules, we have this document called the constitution that gives us rights. One right is the freedom not be face unreasonable searches and seizures. Police do not have the right to make unlawful demands and we do not have to comply with them.

Police have been acting unconstitutionally for quite some time and they try defending themselves with the claim of qualified immunity. Well guess what, there is not a statute in this country that gives police qualified immunity. So they have been killing and beating people in violation of the law. So you take your six rules and shove them deep in your intestines, because they are invalid.

Tell me more about your Constitutional rights when you violently resist a Police Officer and are staring down the barrel of his Glock on a dark road.

Our law enforcement people NEED broad and sweeping powers in order to do they're job and we have given them such power over us to keep the peace.

The benefit to society gained by a continued granting of 'qualified immunity' vastly outweighs the rare and occasional abuse of any such legal shielding.

My six rules were NOT meant to serve as an outline of suspect-side Constitutional rights.

My six rules WERE mean to serve as a common-sense outline of how to keep damned-near any stop-or-arrest situation from ending in harm to the suspect.

That collection serves as GREAT advice that will work darned-near every time.

There's plenty of time to argue Constitutionality and motives and procedural correctness in front of the judge.

At the point-of-arrest is NOT the place to do it.

Fail to observe such rules at your own very great peril.

Choose not to... and choose to violently resist... and you may very well end-up with a toe-tag in the morgue... Nature tends to de-select the less intelligent.

 

[Aldo Raine]

Of course, Mr. S. cannot win in Dem-controlled New York City.

But it's nice to fantasize what a great mayor he would make.

His Guardian Angels did a great job by helping to clean up that city back in the day.

I also have read that he and his group were recently planning to patrol Chinatown to protect the people there from certain individuals!

I guess Rudy was a democrat when he was mayor of NYC! Same with Bloomberg.
MAGA

 

[Darkwind]

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.

The snag is that far too many Americans of color indeed obey that command immediately and end up with a toe-tag regardless.

The reality is that it happens far less than made out to be. In fact, it is statistically insignificant.

Do you think that maybe it's because they don't collect those statistics? Or at least they didn't prior to approximately 5 years ago?

No, I don't think that. I think that the number of people of color who are shot even when obeying lawful commands is insignificant and has been for decades. The whole narrative that people of color are being singled out is not proving to be true by any rational analysis of the data.

 

[IM2]

Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.

When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax

So how do you explain all the videos of that happening? Imagine how many times it's happened without video.

First all police encounters, especially arrests , cannot and should not be pleasant experiences always or even mostly.

And this is the problem, far too many idiots with this type of thinking.

A traffic violation is a minor offense for which the punishment is a fine, not even jail time. So treating people as if they're public enemy number one for a an infraction because the cop is having a bad day or is just an violent, racist asshole is a law enforcement problem.

Don't expect the public to fix their problems, and when you all react the same old way, expect to find yourselves being dealt with in new ways.

Don't want to end-up with your a$$ in a sling, or with a toe-tag?

When you're stopped by police...

1. keep your hands visible at all times
2. obey all police commands
3. shut the phukk up until you're asked to speak
4. be respectful when asked a question
5. don't make excuses - save it for the judge
6. don't run or resist

Whether it's a parking ticket, or a traffic stop, or a car accident, or a suspect-stop, or whether caught-in-the-act red-handed... whatever...

Obey the Six Rules above and you greatly improve your chances of surviving the encounter.,..

Well kondor the first problem here is that Curtis Sliwa will never be mayor of NYC. As for your 6 rules, we have this document called the constitution that gives us rights. One right is the freedom not be face unreasonable searches and seizures. Police do not have the right to make unlawful demands and we do not have to comply with them.

Police have been acting unconstitutionally for quite some time and they try defending themselves with the claim of qualified immunity. Well guess what, there is not a statute in this country that gives police qualified immunity. So they have been killing and beating people in violation of the law. So you take your six rules and shove them deep in your intestines, because they are invalid.

Tell me more about your Constitutional rights when you violently resist a Police Officer and are staring down the barrel of his Glock on a dark road.

Our law enforcement people NEED broad and sweeping powers in order to do they're job and we have given them such power over us to keep the peace.

The benefit to society gained by a continued granting of 'qualified immunity' vastly outweighs the rare and occasional abuse of any such legal shielding.

My six rules were NOT meant to serve as an outline of suspect-side Constitutional rights.

My six rules WERE mean to serve as a common-sense outline of how to keep damned-near any stop-or-arrest situation from ending in harm to the suspect.

That collection serves as GREAT advice that will work darned-near every time.

There's plenty of time to argue Constitutionality and motives and procedural correctness in front of the judge.

At the point-of-arrest is NOT the place to do it.

Fail to observe such rules at your own very great peril.

Choose not to... and choose to violently resist... and you may very well end-up with a toe-tag in the morgue... Nature tends to de-select the less intelligent.

People are getting nurdered while complying. So shut your ass.

 

[IM2]

20 Secrets Police Officers Don't Want You to Know​

The police don't have the right to look through your phone, even when you're in custody.

Unless you give your express consent or there is a warrant, the police do not have the right to look through the contents of your phone—even when you're in their custody. This was decided in the landmark Riley v. California case in 2014, for which Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. decided that, since "digital data stored on a cell phone cannot itself be used as a weapon to harm an arresting officer or to effectuate the arrestee's escape," there is no immediate need for an officer to access the contents of a person's digital devices.

Nor can they enter your residence without a warrant or your consent.

Regardless of what you might see on TV, police officers can't actually burst into your home unless they either A. have a warrant or B. have received your express consent to do so. However, as Scharff Law Firm in Raleigh, North Carolina, points out, there are a few exceptions to this rule. For instance, an officer can enter your home without your consent under the plain view doctrine when they "can see evidence within their sightline."

They also can't search your property without a warrant or your consent.

Not only do police officers not have the right to enter your home without a warrant, but they also can't search your property without one or your consent. But this right is rather recent; it was only in 2018 that the Supreme Court ruled in Collins v. Virginia that "when a law enforcement officer physically intrudes on [a person's property] to gather evidence, a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment has occurred."

Police officers can legally lie to you about having evidence.
And they can trick you into giving them your DNA.
It's also possible for them to get access to your DNA through DNA testing kit companies.
You are legally allowed to film and photograph police officers.
And they can't ask you to delete videos or photos from your phone without a warrant.
Not all states require that you show an officer your identification.
Police have the right to search any abandoned property.
Everything you say is on the record.
Unless you have been arrested or are being detained, you have every right to leave a police station.
The police aren't required to read you your rights if you aren't being detained.
And even if you were arrested, there are things that you can say before being read your rights that are admissible in court.
You have the right to look at any search warrants.
Officers with search warrants almost always have to knock before they enter your house.
Police need probable cause to pull you over.

The police don't have the right to pull you over without probable cause, notes Dallas criminal attorney Mick Mickelson. What's more, if they do pull you over without a reason to do so and subsequently find evidence of a crime in your car, "they usually can't use that evidence in court against you."

A police officer can give you a speeding ticket based on their visual observations alone.
Police officers aren't as familiar with the laws as we may believe.

Just because police officers are tasked with keeping the streets safe and making sure that citizens are abiding by basic laws doesn't mean that they know every single thing about the criminal justice system. Rather, Rick Bruno, a retired police commander, noted on Quora that "there are a lot of laws out there, and we [police officers] know the basic ones for the most part—the ones we deal with all the time—but sometimes someone does something that looks illegal and we're not quite sure."

And they don't always trust their fellow men in uniform.

20 Secrets Police Officers Don't Want You to Know — Best Life

20 Secrets Police Officers Don't Want You to Know

bestlifeonline.com

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.

The snag is that far too many Americans of color indeed obey that command immediately and end up with a toe-tag regardless.

The reality is that it happens far less than made out to be. In fact, it is statistically insignificant.

Do you think that maybe it's because they don't collect those statistics? Or at least they didn't prior to approximately 5 years ago?

No, I don't think that. I think that the number of people of color who are shot even when obeying lawful commands is insignificant and has been for decades. The whole narrative that people of color are being singled out is not proving to be true by any rational analysis of the data.

Well then let me rephrase my question. If these killings have been going on for centuries yet the data has only started being collected five years ago, do you at least understand how that might skew the results a bit?

FBI National Use-of-Force Data Collection​

​

The FBI created the National Use of Force Data Collection in 2015, in partnership with law enforcement agencies, to provide nationwide statistics on law enforcement use-of-force incidents.​

​

The FBI began collecting this data from law enforcement agencies on January 1, 2019. The most recent data is available on the FBI’s Crime Data Explorer website.​

​

The data collection Includes:​

• National-level statistics on law enforcement use-of-force incidents
• Basic information on the circumstances, subjects, and officers involved

The National Use-of-Force Data Collection offers big-picture insights, rather than information on specific incidents. The collection does not assess or report whether officers followed their department’s policy or acted lawfully.​

​

Transcript / Visit Video Source​

The National Use-of-Force Data Collection publications are available on the FBI’s Crime Data Explorer website at fbi.gov/cde.​

​

Law Enforcement Participation​

Participation in the data collection is open to all federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and investigative agencies. Participation is voluntary, and the FBI works closely with law enforcement and major law enforcement organizations to encourage agencies to share this important data. The FBI provides a web portal and bulk electronic submission options for agencies to report their information.​

​

 

[Kondor3]

Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.

When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax

So how do you explain all the videos of that happening? Imagine how many times it's happened without video.

First all police encounters, especially arrests , cannot and should not be pleasant experiences always or even mostly.

And this is the problem, far too many idiots with this type of thinking.

A traffic violation is a minor offense for which the punishment is a fine, not even jail time. So treating people as if they're public enemy number one for a an infraction because the cop is having a bad day or is just an violent, racist asshole is a law enforcement problem.

Don't expect the public to fix their problems, and when you all react the same old way, expect to find yourselves being dealt with in new ways.

Don't want to end-up with your a$$ in a sling, or with a toe-tag?

When you're stopped by police...

1. keep your hands visible at all times
2. obey all police commands
3. shut the phukk up until you're asked to speak
4. be respectful when asked a question
5. don't make excuses - save it for the judge
6. don't run or resist

Whether it's a parking ticket, or a traffic stop, or a car accident, or a suspect-stop, or whether caught-in-the-act red-handed... whatever...

Obey the Six Rules above and you greatly improve your chances of surviving the encounter.,..

Well kondor the first problem here is that Curtis Sliwa will never be mayor of NYC. As for your 6 rules, we have this document called the constitution that gives us rights. One right is the freedom not be face unreasonable searches and seizures. Police do not have the right to make unlawful demands and we do not have to comply with them.

Police have been acting unconstitutionally for quite some time and they try defending themselves with the claim of qualified immunity. Well guess what, there is not a statute in this country that gives police qualified immunity. So they have been killing and beating people in violation of the law. So you take your six rules and shove them deep in your intestines, because they are invalid.

Tell me more about your Constitutional rights when you violently resist a Police Officer and are staring down the barrel of his Glock on a dark road.

Our law enforcement people NEED broad and sweeping powers in order to do they're job and we have given them such power over us to keep the peace.

The benefit to society gained by a continued granting of 'qualified immunity' vastly outweighs the rare and occasional abuse of any such legal shielding.

My six rules were NOT meant to serve as an outline of suspect-side Constitutional rights.

My six rules WERE mean to serve as a common-sense outline of how to keep damned-near any stop-or-arrest situation from ending in harm to the suspect.

That collection serves as GREAT advice that will work darned-near every time.

There's plenty of time to argue Constitutionality and motives and procedural correctness in front of the judge.

At the point-of-arrest is NOT the place to do it.

Fail to observe such rules at your own very great peril.

Choose not to... and choose to violently resist... and you may very well end-up with a toe-tag in the morgue... Nature tends to de-select the less intelligent.

People are getting nurdered while complying. So shut your ass.

For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy.

 

[Kondor3]

20 Secrets Police Officers Don't Want You to Know​

The police don't have the right to look through your phone, even when you're in custody.

Unless you give your express consent or there is a warrant, the police do not have the right to look through the contents of your phone—even when you're in their custody. This was decided in the landmark Riley v. California case in 2014, for which Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. decided that, since "digital data stored on a cell phone cannot itself be used as a weapon to harm an arresting officer or to effectuate the arrestee's escape," there is no immediate need for an officer to access the contents of a person's digital devices.

Nor can they enter your residence without a warrant or your consent.

Regardless of what you might see on TV, police officers can't actually burst into your home unless they either A. have a warrant or B. have received your express consent to do so. However, as Scharff Law Firm in Raleigh, North Carolina, points out, there are a few exceptions to this rule. For instance, an officer can enter your home without your consent under the plain view doctrine when they "can see evidence within their sightline."

They also can't search your property without a warrant or your consent.

Not only do police officers not have the right to enter your home without a warrant, but they also can't search your property without one or your consent. But this right is rather recent; it was only in 2018 that the Supreme Court ruled in Collins v. Virginia that "when a law enforcement officer physically intrudes on [a person's property] to gather evidence, a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment has occurred."

Police officers can legally lie to you about having evidence.
And they can trick you into giving them your DNA.
It's also possible for them to get access to your DNA through DNA testing kit companies.
You are legally allowed to film and photograph police officers.
And they can't ask you to delete videos or photos from your phone without a warrant.
Not all states require that you show an officer your identification.
Police have the right to search any abandoned property.
Everything you say is on the record.
Unless you have been arrested or are being detained, you have every right to leave a police station.
The police aren't required to read you your rights if you aren't being detained.
And even if you were arrested, there are things that you can say before being read your rights that are admissible in court.
You have the right to look at any search warrants.
Officers with search warrants almost always have to knock before they enter your house.
Police need probable cause to pull you over.

The police don't have the right to pull you over without probable cause, notes Dallas criminal attorney Mick Mickelson. What's more, if they do pull you over without a reason to do so and subsequently find evidence of a crime in your car, "they usually can't use that evidence in court against you."

A police officer can give you a speeding ticket based on their visual observations alone.
Police officers aren't as familiar with the laws as we may believe.

Just because police officers are tasked with keeping the streets safe and making sure that citizens are abiding by basic laws doesn't mean that they know every single thing about the criminal justice system. Rather, Rick Bruno, a retired police commander, noted on Quora that "there are a lot of laws out there, and we [police officers] know the basic ones for the most part—the ones we deal with all the time—but sometimes someone does something that looks illegal and we're not quite sure."

And they don't always trust their fellow men in uniform.

20 Secrets Police Officers Don't Want You to Know — Best Life

20 Secrets Police Officers Don't Want You to Know

bestlifeonline.com

So you're telling us that cops aren't God and they haven't memorized the entire vast compendium of criminal and civil law?

Thank you, Captain Obvious.

Next slide, please...