HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
I'm certainly not arguing a side here. Just had read the article so I shared it at your request.Thank you, lady. But it looks to me like Hogg was trying to get the point across that our history is loaded with 'approved' mass shootings and that it is that culture that needs to be addressed.Here ya go. His words and his interview.Do you have a link to what Hogg actually said? Everybody knows what happened at Wounded Knee so I'd really appreciate reading the kid's own words in context.David Hogg, the latest teen to be exploited by the left wing/democrats.......used the massacre at Wounded Knee to push gun banning and confiscation. He did this in an interview on one of the left wing/democrat news programs.....the kid needs to study his history better.....
Sadly, for him....we have the actual history....Dan Proft, of the Dan and Amy morning radio show here in Chicago....pointed out the truth about Wounded Knee.
The massacre happened because? The U.S. Government moved in to confiscate the guns of the Lakota Tribe.....and during the gun grab, ended up slaughtering unarmed men, women, and children....
David Hogg used an example of gun confiscation leading to mass murder and death....to push gun confiscation.........what a freaking moron......
Wounded Knee Massacre - Wikipedia
On the morning of December 29, the U.S. Cavalry troops went into the camp to disarm the Lakota. One version of events claims that during the process of disarming the Lakota, a deaf tribesman named Black Coyote was reluctant to give up his rifle, claiming he had paid a lot for it.
[7] Simultaneously, an old man was performing a ritual called the Ghost Dance. Black Coyote's rifle went off at that point, and the U.S. army began shooting at the Native Americans.
The Lakota warriors fought back, but many had already been stripped of their guns and disarmed.[8]
David Hogg: We Need To Recognize "Indigenous Mass Shootings" Conducted By The American Government
I have some of Hogg's musings before, and I find him pretty well saturated in far, far left ideology. For awhile when he first came on the scene, I predicted he'd be running for office in another 15 years; he seemed a ready made politician with his speechifying and love of the spotlight. Right now, he's too radical, though.
And Bernie and AOC aren't?