Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
JAHEEZUS! it has been all over USMB and the news. stop SPINNING!!!!!!Crutcher had no gun, nor am I aware that he had a criminal record.
Crutcher had no gun, nor am I aware that he had a criminal record.
Whether or not "leftists" never champion true victims, and whether you truly are never wrong depends on your personal perceptions and your socio/political orientation.Leftists never champion true victims. Whenever these stories come out, even before all the facts come in, I always PREDICT the "victim" is in fact a hardened criminal who inched the world closer to perfection by removing themselves from it.
And I'm never wrong.
In this (Scott) example, neither of us had any way of knowing what the true story is until the facts were released and confirmed.
(If this revelation is true) Scott's loudmouth wife should be charged with complicit interference and with endangering police by telling them her husband wasn't armed when she knew he was.
Thanks.Crutcher had no gun, nor am I aware that he had a criminal record.
1996 Shooting with intent to kill — Dismissed
2001 Petit larceny — Conviction
2004 Driving while suspended — Conviction
2005 Driving while suspended, resisting officer — Conviction
2006 Driving while suspended — Conviction
Driving with open container — Dismissed
2006 Trafficking in illegal drugs — Conviction. (He was also charged in that incident with assault on a police officer and resisting, but that was dismissed.)
2011 Public intoxication (while in prison for drug trafficking) — Conviction
2012 Public intoxication — Conviction
Obstructing an officer — Conviction
2013 DUI — Conviction
Resisting officer — Conviction
Open Container — Conviction
Failure to wear seatbelt — Conviction
Speeding — Conviction
Here's The TRUTH About Terence Crutcher Media Hopes You Don't See...
hard to find........apparently "the media" is hiding it. but not that difficult.
While Crutcher's (recently released) criminal record does alter the impression of Shelby's action, the fact that no gun was found in the car remains pivotal. Fortunately for Shelby, owing to progressive police union negotiations and to FOP lobbying efforts, the rules (and laws) concerning the use of deadly force have changed substantially over the past half century.Apparently, what we had over in Tulsa was an un-licensed?, drunk, dealing, shooting, resisting, possibly PCP addled criminal.
Doped up Drunk who tried to reach thru a possibly partially open window against stop orders?
Aunt B. decided to fire her Service Revolver......did she need to fire? She had help right at her side.
I think she got a bit big up in the britches......She will be dreaming about it now.
No. But having a violent criminal history will lend credibility to accusations of menacing behavior.so let me get this right..we are going to maintain that it's okay for cops to gun down people who have criminal records?
Thank you! I am so sick of the America HATING_MUSLIM LOVING media calling that COUNTDOWN TIMER a "clock." Everybody knows it was the guts to a homemade BOMB! And now the little terrorist and his family have the nerve to sue the school and the town! The whole family should be in jail!
Are you talking about the Scott (North Carolina) shooting or the Crutcher shooting (Tulsa), which is what my message is referring to? Crutcher had no gun, nor am I aware that he had a criminal record.
Please be more specific about what I am less than honest about.Are you talking about the Scott (North Carolina) shooting or the Crutcher shooting (Tulsa), which is what my message is referring to? Crutcher had no gun, nor am I aware that he had a criminal record.
You're not being entirely honest.
Betty Shelby Was Justified In Shooting Terence Crutcher. Here's Why.
Protest=no loss of life, no damage to physical property, no loss or damage to property. Riot=damage to or loss of personal/business property, injury to persons/property. Protest=OK, riot=criminal activity. Protestor=pass, rioter=arrest and punishment to the fullest extent of the law.This should have come put earlier. A man lost is life and property was damage because of riots
Enough, there is a process of investigations and trials through the legal system.
Protest should be limited to area, numbers and length of time. If they interfere with roads, business or other civilians it has gone too far. Voicing you feeling should not get violent. Crime of any kind during a protest should never happen.
Speak, make your points, present your evidence, make your argument in a rational, factual manner.
Rude, vulgar, abusive, hostility, screaming makes you look rabid and people will turn you off.
There is a right way and wrong way to protest. Rioting is the wrong way.
Just don't forget the "kaching" factor. Bitch wife sees $$$$ when she sues the local municipality/state/feds for "unlawful" death of her bible-toting, gun-toting, most-beloved and cherished spouse.Keith Scott WAS carrying a stolen gun, police say – and his wife filed for a restraining order against him saying he was armed, violent and had threatened to kill her
Well libs ?
Read more: Keith Scott WAS carrying a stolen gun, police confirm
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
(If this revelation is true) Scott's loudmouth wife should be charged with complicit interference and with endangering police by telling them her husband wasn't armed when she knew he was.
Funny how threads that expose progressives for the utter liars they are, they are no where to be found.
Oh, I know where they are. They are looking for Trumps tax returns. They say "Trump does not pay Taxes" like Trump has that choice. Good God ya'all! ANGER!
All LEO's are trained to ignore anyone claiming any suspect doesn't have a weapon.(If this revelation is true) Scott's loudmouth wife should be charged with complicit interference and with endangering police by telling them her husband wasn't armed when she knew he was.
