Deficit booming under Trump - up 23% - Sorry Sarah Lied

WASHINGTON—The U.S. government’s budget deficit widened in the first eight months of the fiscal year, reflecting lower revenue from corporate taxes combined with ramped-up government spending.
This seems to be an administration of unintended consequences. What do you expect when you lower taxes and increase spending?

Exactly.
But the Trumpanzees squirted all over themselves when Trump passed his tax "reform" and thought their paychecks were going to balloon.
That didn't happen either. It's a pittance.

Here's exactly how much paychecks changed after tax reform for people at every income level from $20,000 to $269,000 a year

Here's exactly how much paychecks changed after tax reform for people at every income level from $20,000 to $269,000 a year
 
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:
I just sit back and laugh at the unhinged idiots.
 
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:

Uh-huh.
Well the Wall Street Journal, my source, is not a Dem, dickhead.
This is how Trump got elected.
By the sheer ignorance seen in your post.
 
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:
Two pointless comments.
Are you disagreeing with the OP?
 
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:
I just sit back and laugh at the unhinged idiots.

I do too. This board is full of them. You're one of the biggest.
 
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:
Two pointless comments.
Are you disagreeing with the OP?

He can't defend Trump or the facts.
So he resorts to shooting the messenger because he can't refute the message
He's a loser.
 
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:

Uh-huh.
Well the Wall Street Journal, my source, is not a Dem, dickhead.
This is how Trump got elected.
By the sheer ignorance seen in your post.

Lib please you have no credibility on this :eusa_hand:
 
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:
Two pointless comments.
Are you disagreeing with the OP?

Isn't it obvious, I'm mocking the left's lack of credibility on deficits and the debt.
 
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:
The fact is Dem's have ZERO credibility on this topic, none whatsoever. So when they start these threads I just roll my eyes, here libs have some of these :icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes::icon_rolleyes:
Two pointless comments.
Are you disagreeing with the OP?

He can't defend Trump or the facts.
So he resorts to shooting the messenger because he can't refute the message
He's a loser.

The have no credibility, your faux rage over deficits and the debt is laughable. Here let me laugh in your face :auiqs.jpg:
 
Lib please you have no credibility on this
Again, are you disagreeing with the OP?

The OP is a simpleton's view of a much larger problem and ignores Trump's grand strategy to solve this problem. Morons and stupid shits may find it interesting, I do not. Lets consider our options...

1. DC Status Quo - confirmed to be a death spiral of debt, $20 trillion headed for $40 trillion.

2. DC Spending Cuts - laughable DC was forced to cut only a fraction of 1% and they squealed like stuck pigs. The problem is now too large to fix with spending cuts anyway.

3. DC Tax Increases - also laughable, the tax increases required would be so large it would face plant the economy and shrink tax revenues.

4. Growth Trumps Plan - our only hope at this point, grow our way out of the problem. Aggressive growth fueled by tax cuts and elimination of jobs/growth killing regulations. Yes you snowflakes may have to ride out some short term increases in the deficit just deal with it.
 
Isn't it obvious, I'm mocking the left's lack of credibility on deficits and the debt.
What do you think the deficit and debt are?

The left's attempt to crash the country, forcing a large scale government takeover rebooting the country as a socialist monarchy ruled by elitist puke liberals, the masses enslaved to fund the government monarchy.
 
From the Wall Street Journal:

U.S. Budget Deficit Widens 23% October Through May on Weak Revenue Growth
"""WASHINGTON—The U.S. government’s budget deficit widened in the first eight months of the fiscal year, reflecting lower revenue from corporate taxes combined with ramped-up government spending.

The deficit, or the difference between the amount of money the federal government spent and what it took in, totaled $532.24 billion in October through May, the Treasury Department said Tuesday. That was 23% more than the deficit of $432.85 billion during the same period a year earlier."""

Sarah lies her ass off:
View attachment 201671

Trump promised to eliminate the deficit.
Trump Promised to Eliminate National Debt in Eight Years. Good Luck With That

This is the kind of shit he doesn't talk about at his rallies. He knows those people are too stupid to ask, too.




/----/ She told the truth in February. Ask Nurse Ratchet to change your calendar to June because you link refers to
Federal budget deficit was $146.80 billion in May...
 
The OP is a simpleton's view of a much larger problem and ignores Trump's grand strategy to solve this problem. Morons and stupid shits may find it interesting, I do not. Lets consider our options...

1. DC Status Quo - confirmed to be a death spiral of debt, $20 trillion headed for $40 trillion.

2. DC Spending Cuts - laughable DC was forced to cut only a fraction of 1% and they squealed like stuck pigs. The problem is now too large to fix with spending cuts anyway.

3. DC Tax Increases - also laughable, the tax increases required would be so large it would face plant the economy and shrink tax revenues.

4. Growth Trumps Plan - our only hope at this point, grow our way out of the problem. Aggressive growth fueled by tax cuts and elimination of jobs/growth killing regulations. Yes you snowflakes may have to ride out some short term increases in the deficit just deal with it.
I agree on your first two points that the US has been on an unsustainable economic path. Your third point addresses tax increases, but they were not on the table. The recent tax decreases are largest for corporations and the wealthy. That is along the lines of trickle-down theory.

You seem to be optimistic that trickle-down will lead to aggressive growth. Many macro-economists have strong doubts.

I don't understand your comment that snowflakes “have to ride out the deficit” when the usual theme is that snowflakes don't care about the deficit, but just want free stuff. I would say that it's the fiscal conservatives who will be concerned about riding it out.
 
Isn't it obvious, I'm mocking the left's lack of credibility on deficits and the debt.
What do you think the deficit and debt are?

The left's attempt to crash the country, forcing a large scale government takeover rebooting the country as a socialist monarchy ruled by elitist puke liberals, the masses enslaved to fund the government monarchy.
Your reply is a bit screwy as a response to my asking you, "What do you think the deficit and debt are?"

I see you are quite angry about the left, and it has an persistence in your replies. Of course the same goes both ways. It seems that there is a bitter hatred in this huge divide and both sides are never going to communicate calmly and logically.
 

Forum List

Back
Top