Dem Jon Ossoff spends more than twice what ALL Republicans spent on GA special election, still loses

[jc456]

One major Democrat candidate (Jon Ossoff) went up against eleven Republicans for a Congressional seat in Georgia, vacated when President Trump picked the former congressman for his cabinet.

The Democrat was backed almost entirely by Hollywood millionaires, who sent him $millions, ran ads for him, etc.

Despite their lopsided spending advantage, Dems were hoping that the election would be a "referendum on the Donald Trump election"

And it was. Despite spending more than twice what all the Republicans spent combined, the Democrat candidate still lost.

He was hoping to get more than 50% of the vote, while Republicans split the Republican vote among 11 candidates. But he failed. Now there will be a runoff election in June, between the Democrat Ossoff and the top Republican finisher, which the Republican candidate Handel will win easily.

The Democrats were right about one thing: The election was a referendum on Donald Trump's election. Democrats can't win even when they are backed by big-money interests from outside the state.

-------------------------------------------------------

Democrats begin to wonder: When do we win?

Democrats begin to wonder: When do we win?

For all the roiling anger and energy at the grass roots, the party still fell short in Georgia and Kansas. And Democratic prospects in upcoming elections aren't promising.

By Gabriel Debenedetti
04/19/17 05:06 AM EDT

As it became clear late Tuesday evening that Jon Ossoff would fall just short of the 50-percent mark in the first round of voting in a suburban Atlanta special election, Democrats back in Washington started leafing through their calendars and asking: When does the winning start?

Spent double the money, and got well more than double the votes of the leading GOP candidate. Not a bad investment.

it's a bad investment when all but one of those GOP candidates goes off the ballot in the next round.

The goal was to reach 50%, it wasn't met.

Now lets see if the DNC doubles down or not.

They shouldn't. Let the little deplorables down there keep fighting to bring back the 1860's.

What by a bunch of backwards yokels continuing to vote the same way they have for 30 years? Fuck 'em.

I love watching libturd tantrums, it is hilarious.

 

[HaShev]

He lost because his shoes were made in Italy.

 

[jc456]

He lost because his shoes were made in Italy.

he stepped in doggy doo doo.

 

[IsaacNewton]

A democrat way ahead of all Republican candidates in THAT district?

The Republicans now see the gathering typhoon off in the distance. It is real.

 

[Tom Horn]

I thought the Kansas run-off was supposed to be the Rat "game-changer"?

 

[TheOldSchool]

One major Democrat candidate (Jon Ossoff) went up against eleven Republicans for a Congressional seat in Georgia, vacated when President Trump picked the former congressman for his cabinet.

The Democrat was backed almost entirely by Hollywood millionaires, who sent him $millions, ran ads for him, etc.

Despite their lopsided spending advantage, Dems were hoping that the election would be a "referendum on the Donald Trump election"

And it was. Despite spending more than twice what all the Republicans spent combined, the Democrat candidate still lost.

He was hoping to get more than 50% of the vote, while Republicans split the Republican vote among 11 candidates. But he failed. Now there will be a runoff election in June, between the Democrat Ossoff and the top Republican finisher, which the Republican candidate Handel will win easily.

The Democrats were right about one thing: The election was a referendum on Donald Trump's election. Democrats can't win even when they are backed by big-money interests from outside the state.

-------------------------------------------------------

Democrats begin to wonder: When do we win?

Democrats begin to wonder: When do we win?

For all the roiling anger and energy at the grass roots, the party still fell short in Georgia and Kansas. And Democratic prospects in upcoming elections aren't promising.

By Gabriel Debenedetti
04/19/17 05:06 AM EDT

As it became clear late Tuesday evening that Jon Ossoff would fall just short of the 50-percent mark in the first round of voting in a suburban Atlanta special election, Democrats back in Washington started leafing through their calendars and asking: When does the winning start?

Spent double the money, and got well more than double the votes of the leading GOP candidate. Not a bad investment.

See how you spin the narative with fake news? The GOP candidate split votes with 11 candidates, so double is actually bad it should have been more then triple for you
to comment. =busted!

The people in that district basically want to bring back slavery and execute all foreigners. The GOP should have gotten over 90% of the vote. To barely break 50% with 11 candidates running is humiliating.

.And it's insulting reverse racist comments like that which show desperation and insult to the intelligence of the voters..
You just proved my points,
Dems don't get it, that cry racism and Xenophobia ploy is not working for yas.

Fun fact: you supporting evil for political gain makes you evil. So I don't care if calling out the evils of a bunch of shameless clodhoppers isn't working for me. I'm still going to do it.

 

[TheOldSchool]

I thought the Kansas run-off was supposed to be the Rat "game-changer"?

Kansas voters are burning the house down and loving it. They get high off the fumes. Democrats should stay away.

 

[Tom Horn]

Fun fact: you supporting evil for political gain makes you evil. So I don't care if calling out the evils of a bunch of shameless clodhoppers isn't working for me. I'm still going to do it.

It's almost inconceivable a Hillary supporter could say this.....^^^^^^^^^^ but there it is.

 

[jc456]

A democrat way ahead of all Republican candidates in THAT district?

The Republicans now see the gathering typhoon off in the distance. It is real.

huh? did you say something?

 

[jc456]

One major Democrat candidate (Jon Ossoff) went up against eleven Republicans for a Congressional seat in Georgia, vacated when President Trump picked the former congressman for his cabinet.

The Democrat was backed almost entirely by Hollywood millionaires, who sent him $millions, ran ads for him, etc.

Despite their lopsided spending advantage, Dems were hoping that the election would be a "referendum on the Donald Trump election"

And it was. Despite spending more than twice what all the Republicans spent combined, the Democrat candidate still lost.

He was hoping to get more than 50% of the vote, while Republicans split the Republican vote among 11 candidates. But he failed. Now there will be a runoff election in June, between the Democrat Ossoff and the top Republican finisher, which the Republican candidate Handel will win easily.

The Democrats were right about one thing: The election was a referendum on Donald Trump's election. Democrats can't win even when they are backed by big-money interests from outside the state.

-------------------------------------------------------

Democrats begin to wonder: When do we win?

Democrats begin to wonder: When do we win?

For all the roiling anger and energy at the grass roots, the party still fell short in Georgia and Kansas. And Democratic prospects in upcoming elections aren't promising.

By Gabriel Debenedetti
04/19/17 05:06 AM EDT

As it became clear late Tuesday evening that Jon Ossoff would fall just short of the 50-percent mark in the first round of voting in a suburban Atlanta special election, Democrats back in Washington started leafing through their calendars and asking: When does the winning start?

Spent double the money, and got well more than double the votes of the leading GOP candidate. Not a bad investment.

See how you spin the narative with fake news? The GOP candidate split votes with 11 candidates, so double is actually bad it should have been more then triple for you
to comment. =busted!

The people in that district basically want to bring back slavery and execute all foreigners. The GOP should have gotten over 90% of the vote. To barely break 50% with 11 candidates running is humiliating.

.And it's insulting reverse racist comments like that which show desperation and insult to the intelligence of the voters..
You just proved my points,
Dems don't get it, that cry racism and Xenophobia ploy is not working for yas.

Fun fact: you supporting evil for political gain makes you evil. So I don't care if calling out the evils of a bunch of shameless clodhoppers isn't working for me. I'm still going to do it.

 

[Tom Horn]

Kansas voters are burning the house down and loving it. They get high off the fumes. Democrats should stay away.

No worries...they're staying away in record numbers and secretly admiring Trump....you are FINISHED as a national party.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Fun fact: you supporting evil for political gain makes you evil. So I don't care if calling out the evils of a bunch of shameless clodhoppers isn't working for me. I'm still going to do it.

It's almost inconceivable a Hillary supporter could say this.....^^^^^^^^^^ but there it is.

We may not exist as a nation in a couple years, and you're choosing to obsess over Hillary? Dumb fucking yokel.

 

[HaShev]

One major Democrat candidate (Jon Ossoff) went up against eleven Republicans for a Congressional seat in Georgia, vacated when President Trump picked the former congressman for his cabinet.

The Democrat was backed almost entirely by Hollywood millionaires, who sent him $millions, ran ads for him, etc.

Despite their lopsided spending advantage, Dems were hoping that the election would be a "referendum on the Donald Trump election"

And it was. Despite spending more than twice what all the Republicans spent combined, the Democrat candidate still lost.

He was hoping to get more than 50% of the vote, while Republicans split the Republican vote among 11 candidates. But he failed. Now there will be a runoff election in June, between the Democrat Ossoff and the top Republican finisher, which the Republican candidate Handel will win easily.

The Democrats were right about one thing: The election was a referendum on Donald Trump's election. Democrats can't win even when they are backed by big-money interests from outside the state.

-------------------------------------------------------

Democrats begin to wonder: When do we win?

Democrats begin to wonder: When do we win?

For all the roiling anger and energy at the grass roots, the party still fell short in Georgia and Kansas. And Democratic prospects in upcoming elections aren't promising.

By Gabriel Debenedetti
04/19/17 05:06 AM EDT

As it became clear late Tuesday evening that Jon Ossoff would fall just short of the 50-percent mark in the first round of voting in a suburban Atlanta special election, Democrats back in Washington started leafing through their calendars and asking: When does the winning start?

Spent double the money, and got well more than double the votes of the leading GOP candidate. Not a bad investment.

See how you spin the narative with fake news? The GOP candidate split votes with 11 candidates, so double is actually bad it should have been more then triple for you
to comment. =busted!

The people in that district basically want to bring back slavery and execute all foreigners. The GOP should have gotten over 90% of the vote. To barely break 50% with 11 candidates running is humiliating.

.And it's insulting reverse racist comments like that which show desperation and insult to the intelligence of the voters..
You just proved my points,
Dems don't get it, that cry racism and Xenophobia ploy is not working for yas.

Fun fact: you supporting evil for political gain makes you evil. So I don't care if calling out the evils of a bunch of shameless clodhoppers isn't working for me. I'm still going to do it.

And you proved once more that you don't get it. You just sank to calling people worse then the deplorables comment.
But worse, your party ran a pure evil candidate with a pure evil campaign and a pure evil sore loser reprise by selling out the country in a failed coupe, so when supporters of that kind of evil call the opposition evil that is a double negative.

 

[jc456]

Fun fact: you supporting evil for political gain makes you evil. So I don't care if calling out the evils of a bunch of shameless clodhoppers isn't working for me. I'm still going to do it.

It's almost inconceivable a Hillary supporter could say this.....^^^^^^^^^^ but there it is.

We may not exist as a nation in a couple years, and you're choosing to obsess over Hillary? Dumb fucking yokel.

you know dude, I see that you all love eating crow.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Spent double the money, and got well more than double the votes of the leading GOP candidate. Not a bad investment.

See how you spin the narative with fake news? The GOP candidate split votes with 11 candidates, so double is actually bad it should have been more then triple for you
to comment. =busted!

The people in that district basically want to bring back slavery and execute all foreigners. The GOP should have gotten over 90% of the vote. To barely break 50% with 11 candidates running is humiliating.

.And it's insulting reverse racist comments like that which show desperation and insult to the intelligence of the voters..
You just proved my points,
Dems don't get it, that cry racism and Xenophobia ploy is not working for yas.

Fun fact: you supporting evil for political gain makes you evil. So I don't care if calling out the evils of a bunch of shameless clodhoppers isn't working for me. I'm still going to do it.

And you proved once more that you don't get it. You just sank to calling people worse then the deplorables comment.
But worse, your party ran a pure evil candidate with a pure evil campaign and a pure evil sore loser reprise by selling out the country in a failed coupe, so when supporters of that kind of evil call the opposition evil that is a double negative.

Your party ran an evil lunatic whose entire campaign was based on threatening helpless people and saying that the U.S. is shit. Congratulations, you achieved political gains by endorsing evil. Now go fuck yourself.

 

[jc456]

See how you spin the narative with fake news? The GOP candidate split votes with 11 candidates, so double is actually bad it should have been more then triple for you
to comment. =busted!

The people in that district basically want to bring back slavery and execute all foreigners. The GOP should have gotten over 90% of the vote. To barely break 50% with 11 candidates running is humiliating.

.And it's insulting reverse racist comments like that which show desperation and insult to the intelligence of the voters..
You just proved my points,
Dems don't get it, that cry racism and Xenophobia ploy is not working for yas.

Fun fact: you supporting evil for political gain makes you evil. So I don't care if calling out the evils of a bunch of shameless clodhoppers isn't working for me. I'm still going to do it.

And you proved once more that you don't get it. You just sank to calling people worse then the deplorables comment.
But worse, your party ran a pure evil candidate with a pure evil campaign and a pure evil sore loser reprise by selling out the country in a failed coupe, so when supporters of that kind of evil call the opposition evil that is a double negative.

Your party ran an evil lunatic whose entire campaign was based on threatening helpless people and saying that the U.S. is shit. Congratulations, you achieved political gains by endorsing evil. Now go fuck yourself.

wow, just wow. give me something of value to argue against. This is but mumbo jumbo cry over my cereal crap.

 

[Tom Horn]

Your party ran an evil lunatic whose entire campaign was based on threatening helpless people and saying that the U.S. is shit. Congratulations, you achieved political gains by endorsing evil. Now go fuck yourself.

 

[Tom Horn]

Motherfucker we may be finished as a nation thanks to you people.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Your party ran an evil lunatic whose entire campaign was based on threatening helpless people and saying that the U.S. is shit. Congratulations, you achieved political gains by endorsing evil. Now go fuck yourself.

Fun fact #2: patting on the back doesn't do anything to help radiation poisoning from nuclear fallout

 

[WaitingFor2020]

One major Democrat candidate (Jon Ossoff) went up against eleven Republicans for a Congressional seat in Georgia, vacated when President Trump picked the former congressman for his cabinet.

The Democrat was backed almost entirely by Hollywood millionaires, who sent him $millions, ran ads for him, etc.

Despite their lopsided spending advantage, Dems were hoping that the election would be a "referendum on the Donald Trump election"

And it was. Despite spending more than twice what all the Republicans spent combined, the Democrat candidate still lost.

He was hoping to get more than 50% of the vote, while Republicans split the Republican vote among 11 candidates. But he failed. Now there will be a runoff election in June, between the Democrat Ossoff and the top Republican finisher, which the Republican candidate Handel will win easily.

The Democrats were right about one thing: The election was a referendum on Donald Trump's election. Democrats can't win even when they are backed by big-money interests from outside the state.

-------------------------------------------------------

Democrats begin to wonder: When do we win?

Democrats begin to wonder: When do we win?

For all the roiling anger and energy at the grass roots, the party still fell short in Georgia and Kansas. And Democratic prospects in upcoming elections aren't promising.

By Gabriel Debenedetti
04/19/17 05:06 AM EDT

As it became clear late Tuesday evening that Jon Ossoff would fall just short of the 50-percent mark in the first round of voting in a suburban Atlanta special election, Democrats back in Washington started leafing through their calendars and asking: When does the winning start?

Spent double the money, and got well more than double the votes of the leading GOP candidate. Not a bad investment.

Rather impressive when you consider he was in newtie's district, which the republicans have held since 1979.

This election is a bellwether for 2018. Ossoff could still win in the June run off, too. Jason Chaffetz of Utah says he's not running next year. I bet he's not the first shoe to drop as other Republican congressmen are seeing how Trump is causing them pure fucking hell at the townhall meetings. My sister lives in Houston, Ted Cruz's district and he won't even HOLD a townhall meeting. He's the biggest chicken ever. Republicans are going to get a bloodbath next year.