Democrat cowardice & philosophy will be the downfall of America.

[HereWeGoAgain]

This coming from the safe space crowd...
I gotta say thank you Timmy,you make me laugh everyday.

You are part of the "free speech zone" crowd, so you might want to laugh at your own pathetic self.

Free speech zone?
Everywhere is a free speech zone,just like concealed carry should be.

Are you somehow not familiar with the legal concept of "free speech zones" championed by the Bush administration? It is so commonplace now that you may not even be aware that setting up enclosed areas where protest is permitted but criminalized elsewhere is a relatively new thing.

Go ahead and type "free speech zones" into google and get back with us.

I'm back it seems it became the norm during the Bush administration, It became so blatantly restrictive of protest rights that the ACLU had to sue the secret service to quit putting protestors way out of sight of the president while letting supporters much closer..

Funny...99% of the info on my search was about college free speech zones.
You guys apparently love the idea.
Google

I guess you have the liberal version of Google.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

We are seeing the seedlings of their work as we speak.
Civil unrest
Terrorism on American soil
Cries for safe spaces
Defense of unpatriotic free speech

The world counts on us as a safe harbor & we are slowly dismantling that image

God what a bunch of fact-free hyperbolic non sense.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Interesting that the GOP choice for President is a big fan of the KGB spymaster (and vice versa) and GOP posters are worried about the population exercising free speech as it would have a negative effect on America.

Yet you have no complaints about hillary running a basement server that opened us up to a hack job from the russians.

As has been proven time and again in the last month or so, secure servers are hack-able so the existance of an alternate server is no more (or less) vulnerable. The argument could be made that the alternate server was actually less likely to be targeted--you have to know about it to target it.

Additionally, it's been 4 years since HRC had any government job...anything that was hacked is now old information and irrelevant.

Come on Cornhole.....are you really suggesting that 4 year old info of the shall we say embarrassing kind cant be used for blackmail and other nefarious uses?

Can? Sure. But when the information you have is on a former government official, the value plummets unless they become a current government official.

Which, if you're going to play the parlor game of hypotheticals, If I can blackmail Clinton with information I hacked off her server, wouldn't I be working day and night to get her elected...instead of what Putin is doing; favoring her opponent?

Thank you for admitting hillary is to big of a national security risk to run for president.
Now tell all your friends...

 

[NYcarbineer]

I pledge allegiance to the Rightwing Flag

and to the Rightwing republic for which it stands,

one Rightwing nation, under the Rightwing God,

divisible by Secession,

with Liberty and Justice for all Rightwingers.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I pledge allegiance to the Rightwing Flag

and to the Rightwing republic for which it stands,

one Rightwing nation, under the Rightwing God,

divisible by Secession,

with Liberty and Justice for all Rightwingers.

I see you're finally coming around.....

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Interesting that the GOP choice for President is a big fan of the KGB spymaster (and vice versa) and GOP posters are worried about the population exercising free speech as it would have a negative effect on America.

Also interesting that open carry is not allowed at rallies for that same candidate...open carry of the Constitution I mean.

What's interesting is the morons who are incapable of articulating an on topic response

You’re an ignorant conservative, Gramps – wrong again as usual, particularly the idiotic notion of ‘unpatriotic’ free speech.

Americans have the right to engage in all manner of protected speech, including speech perceived to be ‘unpatriotic’ or unpopular.

Indeed, the intent of the First Amendment is to protect unpopular speech from the likes of you and other cowardly rightists fearful of diversity, dissent, and expressions of opposing viewpoints.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Interesting that the GOP choice for President is a big fan of the KGB spymaster (and vice versa) and GOP posters are worried about the population exercising free speech as it would have a negative effect on America.

Also interesting that open carry is not allowed at rallies for that same candidate...open carry of the Constitution I mean.

What's interesting is the morons who are incapable of articulating an on topic response

You’re an ignorant conservative, Gramps – wrong again as usual, particularly the idiotic notion of ‘unpatriotic’ free speech.

Americans have the right to engage in all manner of protected speech, including speech perceived to be ‘unpatriotic’ or unpopular.

Indeed, the intent of the First Amendment is to protect unpopular speech from the likes of you and other cowardly rightists fearful of diversity, dissent, and expressions of opposing viewpoints.

Except when that free speech is deemed hateful by the left. Excuse me hypocrite

 

[occupied]

You are part of the "free speech zone" crowd, so you might want to laugh at your own pathetic self.

Free speech zone?
Everywhere is a free speech zone,just like concealed carry should be.

Are you somehow not familiar with the legal concept of "free speech zones" championed by the Bush administration? It is so commonplace now that you may not even be aware that setting up enclosed areas where protest is permitted but criminalized elsewhere is a relatively new thing.

Go ahead and type "free speech zones" into google and get back with us.

I'm back it seems it became the norm during the Bush administration, It became so blatantly restrictive of protest rights that the ACLU had to sue the secret service to quit putting protestors way out of sight of the president while letting supporters much closer..

Funny...99% of the info on my search was about college free speech zones.
You guys apparently love the idea.
Google

I guess you have the liberal version of Google.

Yeah that kind of thing started back in the Vietnam era when everyone was scared of hippies. Somehow I do not think the people who called out the dogs on war protestors were very liberal. My original post did not claim Bush invented free speech zones, he just made it standard procedure for the secret service and used it in a blatantly political way. It's when the term became a synonym for suppression of our first amendment right to protest.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Free speech zone?
Everywhere is a free speech zone,just like concealed carry should be.

Are you somehow not familiar with the legal concept of "free speech zones" championed by the Bush administration? It is so commonplace now that you may not even be aware that setting up enclosed areas where protest is permitted but criminalized elsewhere is a relatively new thing.

Go ahead and type "free speech zones" into google and get back with us.

I'm back it seems it became the norm during the Bush administration, It became so blatantly restrictive of protest rights that the ACLU had to sue the secret service to quit putting protestors way out of sight of the president while letting supporters much closer..

Funny...99% of the info on my search was about college free speech zones.
You guys apparently love the idea.
Google

I guess you have the liberal version of Google.

Yeah that kind of thing started back in the Vietnam era when everyone was scared of hippies. Somehow I do not think the people who called out the dogs on war protestors were very liberal. My original post did not claim Bush invented free speech zones, he just made it standard procedure for the secret service and used it in a blatantly political way. It's when the term became a synonym for suppression of our first amendment right to protest.

 

[frigidweirdo]

We are seeing the seedlings of their work as we speak.
Civil unrest
Terrorism on American soil
Cries for safe spaces
Defense of unpatriotic free speech

The world counts on us as a safe harbor & we are slowly dismantling that image

And it never occurred to you that it's as a result of right wing policies?

Funny how in more liberal countries in the west there is less civil unrest and the like than in the US, and terrorism seems to all be about what the US caused by going into Iraq in 2003.

 

[candycorn]

Interesting that the GOP choice for President is a big fan of the KGB spymaster (and vice versa) and GOP posters are worried about the population exercising free speech as it would have a negative effect on America.

Yet you have no complaints about hillary running a basement server that opened us up to a hack job from the russians.

As has been proven time and again in the last month or so, secure servers are hack-able so the existance of an alternate server is no more (or less) vulnerable. The argument could be made that the alternate server was actually less likely to be targeted--you have to know about it to target it.

Additionally, it's been 4 years since HRC had any government job...anything that was hacked is now old information and irrelevant.

Come on Cornhole.....are you really suggesting that 4 year old info of the shall we say embarrassing kind cant be used for blackmail and other nefarious uses?

Can? Sure. But when the information you have is on a former government official, the value plummets unless they become a current government official.

Which, if you're going to play the parlor game of hypotheticals, If I can blackmail Clinton with information I hacked off her server, wouldn't I be working day and night to get her elected...instead of what Putin is doing; favoring her opponent?

Thank you for admitting hillary is to big of a national security risk to run for president.
Now tell all your friends...

Admitted no such thing. In fact, I illustrated why the whole topic is nonsense.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I pledge allegiance to the Rightwing Flag

and to the Rightwing republic for which it stands,

one Rightwing nation, under the Rightwing God,

divisible by Secession,

with Liberty and Justice for all Rightwingers.

I see you're finally coming around.....

High five!

 

[Londoner]

Where is all this civil unrest by the way ?

Righties are such paranoid freaks.

at no time ever during the year 2016 has there been any protests or riots anywhere in the united states, especially in milwaukee where nothing has ever been set on fire. but, for some reason, millions of right wing people have the exact same hallucination about that at the exact same time. how does that happen?

Listen to talk radio (Levin, Limbaugh, Savage, etc) or Fox News or Republican politicians. They are in lockstep. They belong to a highly controlled, centralized network of apparatchiks who are given huge incentives to vomit the same ol' talking points about a nation under seize... from gays, illegals, Muslims, Hollywood, cultural relativism, anti-war, abortion, blah blah, the media, blah blah blah etc.

Let's face it. Opportunistic politicians have always exploited uneducated people by channeling their frustrations into scapegoats. The culture war pays, this is why Reagan refashioned himself as a conservative Christian, because god-fearing patriots in fly-over country are vulnerable to any faux-outsider politician who fulfills their revanchist paranoia of a nation stolen. This is why Trump is hero to uneducated white men making under 75K a year - because so many of these people don't have the intellectual resources to question the stuff they hear on talk radio and Fox News.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Free speech zone?
Everywhere is a free speech zone,just like concealed carry should be.

Are you somehow not familiar with the legal concept of "free speech zones" championed by the Bush administration? It is so commonplace now that you may not even be aware that setting up enclosed areas where protest is permitted but criminalized elsewhere is a relatively new thing.

Go ahead and type "free speech zones" into google and get back with us.

I'm back it seems it became the norm during the Bush administration, It became so blatantly restrictive of protest rights that the ACLU had to sue the secret service to quit putting protestors way out of sight of the president while letting supporters much closer..

Funny...99% of the info on my search was about college free speech zones.
You guys apparently love the idea.
Google

I guess you have the liberal version of Google.

Yeah that kind of thing started back in the Vietnam era when everyone was scared of hippies. Somehow I do not think the people who called out the dogs on war protestors were very liberal. My original post did not claim Bush invented free speech zones, he just made it standard procedure for the secret service and used it in a blatantly political way. It's when the term became a synonym for suppression of our first amendment right to protest.

Thats interesting....as we all know you rarely go past page one of a search. Doing so shows desperation for validation.
And these all appear to be current...and at colleges?
What gives?

 

[turzovka]

We need to put a stop to that free speech dammit!!!

It's not the free speech we are sounding the alarm over, perceptive one. Unless you are referring to unAmerican incitement speech going on in mosques and Islamic centers we are not being told of.

Where is all this civil unrest by the way ? Righties are such paranoid freaks.

In the hearts and minds of zealot leftist social engineers. Also in untold millions of minorities, middle eastern implants, that your govt and media have helped to fester and exacerbate the so called injustices and go unchallenged. How many bombs and riots are you willing to accept before your concern level rises?

Concern is cheap, everyone has plenty. Letting that concern get the better of you where we end up having to give up more freedoms for the illusion of security is the problem here. Being overly concerned about terrorism brought us two stupid wars, torture, Gitmo, the patriot act, homeland security, a second Bush term and domestic spying. It looks like conservatives would be happy to continue this horrible trend.

Never mind.

Your slogans and misrepresentations will play well to the same "dumbed down" crowd influenced by Hillary ads.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

We need to put a stop to that free speech dammit!!!

Lol! You righties are such drama queens !

You people do exactly that, stopping free speech, when you create bullshit concepts such as "hate speech" and then remain inconsistent in its enforcement. You just called someone a queen. If someone on your side is called a queen, you immediately pull the hate speech card.

More ignorance and stupidity from the right.

The doctrine of free speech concerns solely the relationship between government and those governed, not between and among private persons and organizations.

One private person cannot ‘violate’ the free speech of another private person; only government has the authority to place limits and restrictions on speech, consistent with First Amendment jurisprudence; and when government acts contrary to that jurisprudence, those unlawful restrictions are invalidated by the courts.

That a private person might denounce or oppose your bigotry and hate is not to ‘deny’ you ‘free speech,’ the notion is ignorant idiocy.

Last, hate speech is entitled to Constitutional protections, and no one seeks to prohibit through force of law you or any rightwing bigot from expressing your ignorance and hate.

 

[candycorn]

We are seeing the seedlings of their work as we speak.
Civil unrest
Terrorism on American soil
Cries for safe spaces
Defense of unpatriotic free speech

The world counts on us as a safe harbor & we are slowly dismantling that image

And it never occurred to you that it's as a result of right wing policies?

Funny how in more liberal countries in the west there is less civil unrest and the like than in the US, and terrorism seems to all be about what the US caused by going into Iraq in 2003.

Its called blowback and its the only thing that is assured about any military intervention into another nation or region. There are finatics that will extract their pound of flesh. Sometimes it's a head of state (see Lincoln) and sometimes it's just freestyle tantrum throwing such as the attacking of soft targets with no value other than whatever terror the attack envokes.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

We are seeing the seedlings of their work as we speak.
Civil unrest
Terrorism on American soil
Cries for safe spaces
Defense of unpatriotic free speech

The world counts on us as a safe harbor & we are slowly dismantling that image

And it never occurred to you that it's as a result of right wing policies?

Funny how in more liberal countries in the west there is less civil unrest and the like than in the US, and terrorism seems to all be about what the US caused by going into Iraq in 2003.

Terrorism existed before 2003 dummy. Muslims have been trying to exterminate humanity since the beginning of time. The scum still live in mud huts for fucks sake. Their ideology has nothing to do with conservatives and everything to do with world domination via insane religious ideology.

Pull your head out of your stone age ass

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I pledge allegiance to the Rightwing Flag

and to the Rightwing republic for which it stands,

one Rightwing nation, under the Rightwing God,

divisible by Secession,

with Liberty and Justice for all Rightwingers.

I see you're finally coming around.....

High five!

Are you the one holding the bouquet of flowers?

 

[frigidweirdo]

We are seeing the seedlings of their work as we speak.
Civil unrest
Terrorism on American soil
Cries for safe spaces
Defense of unpatriotic free speech

The world counts on us as a safe harbor & we are slowly dismantling that image

And it never occurred to you that it's as a result of right wing policies?

Funny how in more liberal countries in the west there is less civil unrest and the like than in the US, and terrorism seems to all be about what the US caused by going into Iraq in 2003.

Its called blowback and its the only thing that is assured about any military intervention into another nation or region. There are finatics that will extract their pound of flesh. Sometimes it's a head of state (see Lincoln) and sometimes it's just freestyle tantrum throwing such as the attacking of soft targets with no value other than whatever terror the attack envokes.

Terrorism is a good way of making use of limited resources when you're weaker than your enemy.

The Afghans have always used guerrilla tactics to defeat stronger forces. The Vietnamese did it. It's not about strength, it's about using your brain, and terrorism is making the most of a situation.

If you don't want terrorism, don't go around the world causing problems.