Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yeah, it's all me. you couldn't conduct a discussion at all. You are not open minded at all. I'm always willing to hear the other side. You despise the other side. That's a no mover immediately.And you purposely destroy any prospects for a discussion.
only hollywood worries about pleasing. News should never. Here's the news, like it or leave it.Well, let us start with the third sentence you have there.
The truth should not care what is or is not pleasing to the audience.
To the extent that PA is corrupt? Yes, many of them. I would place only New York, Maryland, and California as more corrupt. I have lived in all of them except Maryland.
Fair enough. I haven't ever lived in either, but that doesn't mean that they aren't as corrupt.I would add at least Missouri and Illinois into that mix
You've misunderstood what I said. The corporation's first priority should be to build the biggest audience possible and should therefore cater to what produces the biggest audience.Well, let us start with the third sentence you have there.
The truth should not care what is or is not pleasing to the audience.
Fair enough. I haven't ever lived in either, but that doesn't mean that they aren't as corrupt.
The problem is not with the corporations, per se. They deal with the advertising side of their product.You've misunderstood what I said. The corporation's first priority should be to build the biggest audience possible and should therefore cater to what produces the biggest audience.
I say 'should' and will assume the corporations 'do' until hearing evidence to say otherwise.
But I'm certainly not going kneejerk reject evidence to show that a corporate CEO could put personal preferences over profit. It just seems unlikely.
There are several other factors to consider.
Your only motive has always been to disrupt and in this case it's out of your fear that some common ground could be reached.only hollywood worries about pleasing. News should never. Here's the news, like it or leave it.
At least they managed to make the system work there. Not to many PA governors have committed the fraud and crimes that Wolf has and remained out of jail. Even New York, of all places, managed to replace their corrupt Governor.I think Illinois holds the record with 3 straight Govs going from the statehouse to the big house
so you don't want news organization to actually report factual news. gotcha. I call what you're pushing a tv series.Your only motive has always been to disrupt and in this case it's out of your fear that some common ground could be reached.
I'll keep it limited to one point being made. Who are these editors and why would the corporation tolerate a POV that opposes the CEO or other authority?The problem is not with the corporations, per se. They deal with the advertising side of their product.
It is the editors at these entities that are 100% in for progressive ideology and will ensure that the product they produce will reflect ONLY those values.
No, that's not the point and what I want isn't an issue here. I'm clearly saying that the corporation will dictate the politics of the media source.so you don't want news organization to actually report factual news. gotcha. I call what you're pushing a tv series.
then it isn't news. plain and simple. News is spontaneous and doesn't rely on ratings. To suggest otherwise means tv series promotions.No, that's not the point and what I want isn't an issue here. I'm clearly saying that the corporation will dictate the politics of the media source.
The bottom line is the answer.I'll keep it limited to one point being made. Who are these editors and why would the corporation tolerate a POV that opposes the CEO or other authority?
The practice of Fox news and Msnbc seem to indicate that the corporation's agenda is being strictly observed.
The truth is, not only if FoxNews and MSNBC are extreme, they all are of the same mold.No, that's not the point and what I want isn't an issue here. I'm clearly saying that the corporation will dictate the politics of the media source.
Fox news and MSNBC are extreme examples.
And no doubt that Msnbc produces pro-war propaganda, which is likely favourable to the corporation and very desirable to the American people.
I don't know if Fox is doing the same thing. It's not available to me.
Not impressed. I want the dudes we saw caught on film backing up trailer truck loads of illegal ballots in the dead of night shipped down from New York and New Jersey."According to the report, Myers bribed a judge of elections in Philidelphia to add votes to the candidates of his choice, again, all Democrats. Those bribes totaled hundreds of thousands of dollars, so this was no small operation. Further, Myers also conspired with another elections judge in a scheme to push people to vote for certain candidates. Lastly, that judge also cast votes for candidates who weren’t even on the ballot."
Judges involved...need to boot them from their benches, strip their law licenses, and ban them from ever voting again ... not to mention JAIL TIME.
I'll keep it limited to one point being made. Who are these editors and why would the corporation tolerate a POV that opposes the CEO or other authority?
The practice of Fox news and Msnbc seem to indicate that the corporation's agenda is being strictly observed.
abcnews4.com
www.foxnews.com
www.foxnews.com
