Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, we'll never really know whether that is indeed the case. The man won 50.2% percent of the vote. That does not suggest he'd have won at all but for the 70% of voters who'd cast their ballots prior to his contretemps.We love our "deplorables." He would have won by a bigger margin if we knew how he really felt about pajama boy "journalists"~70% of the turnout in the one in Montana voted before the candidate's deplorable character became unequivocally clear.
I don't remember anyone thinking a conservative had a chance there. Unlike what the left was claiming in the other elections.A Democratic candidate just won a special election in California for a congressional seat.
Jimmy Gomez wins Los Angeles congressional election to replace Xavier Becerra
It's not a surprise that a Democrat won, being two Democrats were running. Jungle primaries (all primary candidates run on the same slate, and the two top vote-getters move on) can lead to such results.
Yes, it was a safe blue district.
However, after the Montana special election in a safe red district, the Republicans on this forum were unanimously declaring that such things don't matter, and a Republican win in a safe red district there meant the Democrats were doomed.
Montana House Seat...The Right just keeps on winning
So, by their own snowflake standards, the Republicans have admitted that this latest Democrat win means the Republicans are doomed.
(I love hoisting the kooks with their own petards.)
Let go of the petard, you're choking yourself.
I don't remember anyone thinking a conservative had a chance there. Unlike what the left was claiming in the other elections.A Democratic candidate just won a special election in California for a congressional seat.
Jimmy Gomez wins Los Angeles congressional election to replace Xavier Becerra
It's not a surprise that a Democrat won, being two Democrats were running. Jungle primaries (all primary candidates run on the same slate, and the two top vote-getters move on) can lead to such results.
Yes, it was a safe blue district.
However, after the Montana special election in a safe red district, the Republicans on this forum were unanimously declaring that such things don't matter, and a Republican win in a safe red district there meant the Democrats were doomed.
Montana House Seat...The Right just keeps on winning
So, by their own snowflake standards, the Republicans have admitted that this latest Democrat win means the Republicans are doomed.
(I love hoisting the kooks with their own petards.)
Let go of the petard, you're choking yourself.
lol but a Republican barely winning in Montana made you people come in your pants.
A Democratic candidate just won a special election in California for a congressional seat.
Jimmy Gomez wins Los Angeles congressional election to replace Xavier Becerra
It's not a surprise that a Democrat won, being two Democrats were running. Jungle primaries (all primary candidates run on the same slate, and the two top vote-getters move on) can lead to such results.
Yes, it was a safe blue district.
However, after the Montana special election in a safe red district, the Republicans on this forum were unanimously declaring that such things don't matter, and a Republican win in a safe red district there meant the Democrats were doomed.
Montana House Seat...The Right just keeps on winning
So, by their own snowflake standards, the Republicans have admitted that this latest Democrat win means the Republicans are doomed.
(I love hoisting the kooks with their own petards.)
This is completely predictable news.This is awesome news! Go democrats.
You gave the left a woodie by saying they had a Soviet style election process.A Democratic candidate just won a special election in California for a congressional seat.
Jimmy Gomez wins Los Angeles congressional election to replace Xavier Becerra
It's not a surprise that a Democrat won, being two Democrats were running. Jungle primaries (all primary candidates run on the same slate, and the two top vote-getters move on) can lead to such results.
Yes, it was a safe blue district.
However, after the Montana special election in a safe red district, the Republicans on this forum were unanimously declaring that such things don't matter, and a Republican win in a safe red district there meant the Democrats were doomed.
Montana House Seat...The Right just keeps on winning
So, by their own snowflake standards, the Republicans have admitted that this latest Democrat win means the Republicans are doomed.
(I love hoisting the kooks with their own petards.)
Really scraping crap out of the bottom of an old pickle barrel here. The news is -- don't EVER allow a power mad party to capture the political process and pass onerous "Top 2" rules for primaries that GUARANTEE a good old fashioned 60's Soviet one party system.
So the Repubs offer 4 candidates and the Dems BULLY any more than 2 off the primary ballot -- what do you THINK happens? Disenfranching 42% of the electorate out of even HAVING an opposition candidate on the General Election Ballot.
Disenfranchising is getting to be a HallMark of DNC politics.. What with SuperDuper Delegates worth 70,000 regular citizen votes, Top 2 Primary slicing and dicing, and not running any candidates in losing districts -- they got the franchise on Soviet -- pretty much locked up...
Montana went GOP even though he tackled a reporter.A Democratic candidate just won a special election in California for a congressional seat.
Jimmy Gomez wins Los Angeles congressional election to replace Xavier Becerra
It's not a surprise that a Democrat won, being two Democrats were running. Jungle primaries (all primary candidates run on the same slate, and the two top vote-getters move on) can lead to such results.
Yes, it was a safe blue district.
However, after the Montana special election in a safe red district, the Republicans on this forum were unanimously declaring that such things don't matter, and a Republican win in a safe red district there meant the Democrats were doomed.
Montana House Seat...The Right just keeps on winning
So, by their own snowflake standards, the Republicans have admitted that this latest Democrat win means the Republicans are doomed.
(I love hoisting the kooks with their own petards.)
The last limb of an unborn child being sucked out by a vacuum tube from its mothers womb.You guys need a win where you can find one.A Democratic candidate just won a special election in California for a congressional seat.
Jimmy Gomez wins Los Angeles congressional election to replace Xavier Becerra
It's not a surprise that a Democrat won, being two Democrats were running. Jungle primaries (all primary candidates run on the same slate, and the two top vote-getters move on) can lead to such results.
Yes, it was a safe blue district.
However, after the Montana special election in a safe red district, the Republicans on this forum were unanimously declaring that such things don't matter, and a Republican win in a safe red district there meant the Democrats were doomed.
Montana House Seat...The Right just keeps on winning
So, by their own snowflake standards, the Republicans have admitted that this latest Democrat win means the Republicans are doomed.
(I love hoisting the kooks with their own petards.)
You must feel like the last living cell in a dead body!
Republicans celebrate by body slamming already born people.Democrats should celebrate by offering their voters free abortions for the day.
Really scraping crap out of the bottom of an old pickle barrel here. The news is -- don't EVER allow a power mad party to capture the political process and pass onerous "Top 2" rules for primaries that GUARANTEE a good old fashioned 60's Soviet one party system.
You're not making any sense. If the Democrats had enough votes to take the two top spots in the primaries, they would have easily won the general. And the voters had a choice between parties, in the primaries. But then, you're just out to vomit sick hatred at Democrats, not to make sense.
We are very, very desperate, aren't we?A Democratic candidate just won a special election in California for a congressional seat.
Jimmy Gomez wins Los Angeles congressional election to replace Xavier Becerra
It's not a surprise that a Democrat won, being two Democrats were running. Jungle primaries (all primary candidates run on the same slate, and the two top vote-getters move on) can lead to such results.
Yes, it was a safe blue district.
However, after the Montana special election in a safe red district, the Republicans on this forum were unanimously declaring that such things don't matter, and a Republican win in a safe red district there meant the Democrats were doomed.
Montana House Seat...The Right just keeps on winning
So, by their own snowflake standards, the Republicans have admitted that this latest Democrat win means the Republicans are doomed.
(I love hoisting the kooks with their own petards.)
A Democratic candidate just won a special election in California for a congressional seat.
Jimmy Gomez wins Los Angeles congressional election to replace Xavier Becerra
It's not a surprise that a Democrat won, being two Democrats were running. Jungle primaries (all primary candidates run on the same slate, and the two top vote-getters move on) can lead to such results.
Yes, it was a safe blue district.
However, after the Montana special election in a safe red district, the Republicans on this forum were unanimously declaring that such things don't matter, and a Republican win in a safe red district there meant the Democrats were doomed.
Montana House Seat...The Right just keeps on winning
So, by their own snowflake standards, the Republicans have admitted that this latest Democrat win means the Republicans are doomed.
(I love hoisting the kooks with their own petards.)
Really scraping crap out of the bottom of an old pickle barrel here. The news is -- don't EVER allow a power mad party to capture the political process and pass onerous "Top 2" rules for primaries that GUARANTEE a good old fashioned 60's Soviet one party system.
So the Repubs offer 4 candidates and the Dems BULLY any more than 2 off the primary ballot -- what do you THINK happens? Disenfranching 42% of the electorate out of even HAVING an opposition candidate on the General Election Ballot.
Disenfranchising is getting to be a HallMark of DNC politics.. What with SuperDuper Delegates worth 70,000 regular citizen votes, Top 2 Primary slicing and dicing, and not running any candidates in losing districts -- they got the franchise on Soviet -- pretty much locked up...
Everyone is trying to get an early look at what 2018 will be like.Really scraping crap out of the bottom of an old pickle barrel here. The news is -- don't EVER allow a power mad party to capture the political process and pass onerous "Top 2" rules for primaries that GUARANTEE a good old fashioned 60's Soviet one party system.
You're not making any sense. If the Democrats had enough votes to take the two top spots in the primaries, they would have easily won the general. And the voters had a choice between parties, in the primaries. But then, you're just out to vomit sick hatred at Democrats, not to make sense.
Brooking studied jungle primaries.
The Primaries Project: Blanket Primaries Have Yet to Deliver | Brookings Institution
---
As the table below shows, over 80% of the primary outcomes maintain ‘Democrat versus Republican’ contests for the general election. However, of the exceptions, all five of the ‘Democrat versus Democrat’ races are in “solid Democrat” districts, according to The Cook Political Report, and all three ‘Republican versus Republican’ races are in “solid Republican” districts.
---
Why weren't you screaming deranged nonsense about how those Republican vs. Republican matchups revealed a power mad Stalinist Republican party? You'd look less hypocritical now if you had done so, less like a corrupt Republican party shill.
