DandyDonovan
VIP Member
- Nov 29, 2018
- 2,344
- 316
- 65
- Banned
- #1,101
Pretty damned hypocritical, when there's not a chance in Hell we would make a similar adoption if the roles were reversed.
Also, insignificant conduct rules that affect nothing of importance to most people and are based on fashion styles and etiquette that fell out of fashion over fifty years ago are hardly "our ways" that we need to demand conformity to.
Please remember that we're talking about an article of personal dress, not animal sacrifice on the steps of the Capitol.
If I joined a group that had a rule that all members had to wear hats, during meetings, I would buy a hat and freaking wear it at meetings.
I might grumble about the expense, complain about how stupid it is, or bitch about it.
But I would not expect an institution and people who have been doing things one way for generations to change for me, just because I don't normally wear a hat.
Yeah, this isn't "joining a group" like signing up for the Kiwanis. This is the federal legislature, which makes laws for the entire country. And you're suggesting that it is reasonable to expect citizens of the United States to forego their Constitutional right to run for elected office and participate in political policy-making because of an obscure, obsolete dress code rule? It is so damned important that no one ever wear a hat in the House chamber that it should supersede multiple Constitutional rights? That is actually the position you want to stake out here?!
It is on them to figure out how to live in our society, not the other way around.
Or at least, in a sane world, it would be.
That is the principle here.
I hate to break this to you Sparky, but this woman did figure out how to live in our system, she figured out that the rule against headwear can be changed, and it will be. So your argument that she isn't living within our system is 100% dead wrong.
She is not living in our system, she is changing it to be HER system. We are the ones that are going to have to learn to live in it now.
OUR system allows for changes. You realize, of course, that if the House had wanted the rules to be permanent they could have long ago made a rule stating that no rules may be changed, don't you?
That is , in fact, the beauty of our entire system. It is entirely adaptable, and even our Constitution can be changed, albeit in a very difficult process as is appropriate.