Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is only ignorant, gullible sheep, and the lying tyrants who they support, who keep speaking of “super spreader events”, and other ways to disparage those of us who refuse to be deceived and intimidated into sacrificing our most essential freedoms over a fake “pandemic”.
Ironically those activities unabated and unmasked have resulted in more Americans dying than in world war 2, and in 1/4 the time.Any sane person has to know that when someone like you tries, in such a manner, to equate attending legitimate church services, working to earn a living, shopping, and otherwise going about necessary life activities, to Islamism terrorism; that the one who is making such a comparison is seriously fucked-up in the head, and in the soul.
I think playtime ran out of PRAVDA talking points.They have the right to have services and saying they don't is against the constitution. Blm needs to be fined millions for having thousands of super spreader events. You agree or you gonna be a hypocrite?any place of worship that defies the mandate is violating the law & they should never call themselves 'pro life ' again.
playtime has a life. & i just fucking answered that silly impotent post.
You science says there is only 2 genders?The only two houses of worship raided were Christianwho is singling out christians?
now you show me otherwise
perhaps jews & mooooooooooslums are abiding by the science.
Perfect example of a DemonRat.any place of worship that defies the mandate is violating the law & they should never call themselves 'pro life ' again.
The lake of fire is gonna be crowded
any place of worship that defies the mandate is violating the law & they should never call themselves 'pro life ' again.
The Constitution is the highest law of the land in this country.
What does it say about freedoms of religion and assembly?
Who is violating the law, here? It certainly is not those who are legitimately exercising rights which the First Amendment explicitly affirms and protects.
It's funny when degenerateleftwrong-wing filth, such as yourself, try to pay lip service to the rule of law, in defense of lawlessness and corruption.
ok - ' law' might have been said in haste - - - super spreading a virus without caring about yer [sic] fellow humans is no where near ' pro life ' .
No matter how much you move the goalposts, you're still full of shit.
Nobody is “super spreading” anything. That's just your bullshitleftwrong-wing lies and fearmongering. More and more, sane, intelligent people are ceasing to be deceived or intimidated by it.
Go fuck yourself, you subhuman piece of statist shit.
You science says there is only 2 genders?The only two houses of worship raided were Christianwho is singling out christians?
now you show me otherwise
perhaps jews & mooooooooooslums are abiding by the science.
abortion clinics are also practicing strict adherence to what's keeping the covid cooties at bay.
And yet they are responsible for far more human deaths than the other top several causes of death combined.
In defending this butchery, you completely and totally forfeit any credibility in claiming to care about any human life.
It seems hypocritical for republicans to oppose both abortion, and the social programs needed to protect the children that avoided abortion.Leave it to a subhumanleftwrong-wing piece of shit to expose his own blatant racism, while trying to falsely accuse his opponents of racism.
View attachment 436108
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
Why are republicans against providing those pregnant mothers quality pre-natal and natal care, especially to those who cant' afford it.
You might have an argument if republicanas [sic] supported universal healthcare, you would have a pillar on which to stand, but you fight every social welfare program.
As long as you defend the “right” to murder these children in cold blood, you are in no moral position to even bring up the question.
It's a whole other matter to try to argue which means of having government steal from those who work to earn their livings, for the benefit of those who will not, is most beneficial or most harmful to the children whose lives you falsely claim to care about; but we aren't even there as long as you support murdering these children.
Why are republicans against providing those pregnant mothers quality pre-natal and natal care, especially to those who cant' afford it.
You might have an argument if republicanas [sic] supported universal healthcare, you would have a pillar on which to stand, but you fight every social welfare program.
As long as you defend the “right” to murder these children in cold blood, you are in no moral position to even bring up the question.
It's a whole other matter to try to argue which means of having government steal from those who work to earn their livings, for the benefit of those who will not, is most beneficial or most harmful to the children whose lives you falsely claim to care about; but we aren't even there as long as you support murdering these children.
when all them thar post born children get the food, medical care, housing, & education thru higher taxes - which is what is needed to do just that ... then you & yer ilk might have some credibility in what you claim is being 'pro life'.
Exactly my point. If a religion in the middle of a deadly pandemic schemes to bring their people together into a super spreader setting, the result of which had been previously shown to result in people spreading the virus, in a chain of infections with people hospitalized and dying. And their crowded gathering could easily again lead to people dying. So as you said, no rational person sees religious freedom as protecting actions leading to peoples deaths..No rational person sees religious freedom as protecting the commission of crimes of violence and destruction, nor conspiring to commit such crimes.
It is only ignorant, gullible sheep, and the lying tyrants who they support, who keep speaking of “super spreader events”, and other ways to disparage those of us who refuse to be deceived and intimidated into sacrificing our most essential freedoms over a fake “pandemic”.
Any sane person has to know that when someone like you tries, in such a manner, to equate attending legitimate church services, working to earn a living, shopping, and otherwise going about necessary life activities, to Islamism terrorism; that the one who is making such a comparison is seriously fucked-up in the head, and in the soul.
You're rather see people starve to death, or lose their homes and wind up living in the streets, than to see the power of the tyrants that you worship be diminished.
Why are republicans against providing those pregnant mothers quality pre-natal and natal care, especially to those who cant' afford it.
You might have an argument if republicanas [sic] supported universal healthcare, you would have a pillar on which to stand, but you fight every social welfare program.
As long as you defend the “right” to murder these children in cold blood, you are in no moral position to even bring up the question.
It's a whole other matter to try to argue which means of having government steal from those who work to earn their livings, for the benefit of those who will not, is most beneficial or most harmful to the children whose lives you falsely claim to care about; but we aren't even there as long as you support murdering these children.
when all them thar post born children get the food, medical care, housing, & education thru higher taxes - which is what is needed to do just that ... then you & yer ilk might have some credibility in what you claim is being 'pro life'.
It isn't the taxpayers who are knocking up these broads, its the baby's daddies. Why have higher taxes, why not just have the fathers do the right thing?
To the contrary, granting religious entities tax breaks is "establishing" them as government recognized, sanctioned, and supported institutions. It's just that few can be bothered to point out that obvious contradiction since most secular non-profits now apply for and are granted the same.View attachment 436108
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
nobody is taking those rights away.
To the contrary, granting religious entities tax breaks is "establishing" them as government recognized, sanctioned, and supported institutions. It's just that few can be bothered to point out that obvious contradiction since most secular non-profits now apply for and are granted the same.View attachment 436108
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
nobody is taking those rights away.
On the abortion issue....one million a year.It seems hypocritical for republicans to oppose both abortion, and the social programs needed to protect the children that avoided abortion.Leave it to a subhumanleftwrong-wing piece of shit to expose his own blatant racism, while trying to falsely accuse his opponents of racism.
there's no 'seeming' about it.
it's hypocrisy in its purest form.
To the contrary, granting religious entities tax breaks is "establishing" them as government recognized, sanctioned, and supported institutions. It's just that few can be bothered to point out that obvious contradiction since most secular non-profits now apply for and are granted the same.View attachment 436108
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
nobody is taking those rights away.
there shouldn't be any tax exemption for any houses of worship that don't prove at least 60% of 'income' isn't used for social programs.
On the abortion issue....one million a year.It seems hypocritical for republicans to oppose both abortion, and the social programs needed to protect the children that avoided abortion.Leave it to a subhumanleftwrong-wing piece of shit to expose his own blatant racism, while trying to falsely accuse his opponents of racism.
there's no 'seeming' about it.
it's hypocrisy in its purest form.
