Democrats Hate Amy Coney Barrett Because They Hate the Constitution

Sun Devil 92

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2015
32,078
11,094
1,410

If we look at the current positions of the modern Democratic Party, it is clear that they do not share Amy Coney Barrett’s originalist point of view. In fact, their current rhetoric demonstrates that they are far beyond merely despising the philosophy of originalism. Instead, they are actively working to radically and fundamentally transform the Constitution into an unrecognizable monstrosity.

As has already been pointed out, by Turley...this is the case.

They keep pushing the idea that justices can't rule to reverse "progress" and that they have to rule the way the senate wants them to vote.

The democrats seem to have lost all sense of the purpose of the court.
 

If we look at the current positions of the modern Democratic Party, it is clear that they do not share Amy Coney Barrett’s originalist point of view. In fact, their current rhetoric demonstrates that they are far beyond merely despising the philosophy of originalism. Instead, they are actively working to radically and fundamentally transform the Constitution into an unrecognizable monstrosity.

As has already been pointed out, by Turley...this is the case.

They keep pushing the idea that justices can't rule to reverse "progress" and that they have to rule the way the senate wants them to vote.

The democrats seem to have lost all sense of the purpose of the court.

What a stupid rant.
Nobody's trampled on the Constitution more than Fat Boy, who's wheezing at Walter Reed right now because he's too fucking arrogant to wear a mask.
Barrett is a hard-liner who is going to insure that you will be paying a lot more in taxes for fostering children and welfare mothers after this Court, which is supposed to be apolitical in the first place, reverses Roe v Wade.
THAT is why Dems don't like her.
 
If we look at the current positions of the modern Democratic Party, it is clear that they do not share Amy Coney Barrett’s originalist point of view. In fact, their current rhetoric demonstrates that they are far beyond merely despising the philosophy of originalism. Instead, they are actively working to radically and fundamentally transform the Constitution into an unrecognizable monstrosity.

Naw, we hate Serena Joy because she is a religious nut who wants to impose her religious nutbaggery on the rest of us.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
If we look at the current positions of the modern Democratic Party, it is clear that they do not share Amy Coney Barrett’s originalist point of view. In fact, their current rhetoric demonstrates that they are far beyond merely despising the philosophy of originalism. Instead, they are actively working to radically and fundamentally transform the Constitution into an unrecognizable monstrosity.

Naw, we hate Serena Joy because she is a religious nut who wants to impose her religious nutbaggery on the rest of us.

Please point out where this was part of a decision.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6

If we look at the current positions of the modern Democratic Party, it is clear that they do not share Amy Coney Barrett’s originalist point of view. In fact, their current rhetoric demonstrates that they are far beyond merely despising the philosophy of originalism. Instead, they are actively working to radically and fundamentally transform the Constitution into an unrecognizable monstrosity.

As has already been pointed out, by Turley...this is the case.

They keep pushing the idea that justices can't rule to reverse "progress" and that they have to rule the way the senate wants them to vote.

The democrats seem to have lost all sense of the purpose of the court.

What a stupid rant.
Nobody's trampled on the Constitution more than Fat Boy, who's wheezing at Walter Reed right now because he's too fucking arrogant to wear a mask.
Barrett is a hard-liner who is going to insure that you will be paying a lot more in taxes for fostering children and welfare mothers after this Court, which is supposed to be apolitical in the first place, reverses Roe v Wade.
THAT is why Dems don't like her.

Sorry, but you have the slut you are running as VP saying she won't vote for a judge who won't swear allegiance to Roe.

If you don't understand how that is a total fail, maybe you should get off the board and do some reading.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
Please point out where this was part of a decision.

The idea is to keep Serena Joy from making any decisions, as her husband will be making them for her.

Well, she taught law for 15 years. Her students really really liked her.

She's been a judge for at least a couple of years.

You can surely find something to back your stupidassed worry.
 
Well, starting in about three weeks, you'll see if your basement driven concern is real.

Yeah, kind of bad form for you guys to have hearings when you haven't taken care of Covid Aid for the millions of unemployed... it almost looks like you are trying to ram through the nomination.

Not to worry, at the rate that GOP Senators are dropping from the Covid, you probably won't have hearings.
 
Well, she taught law for 15 years. Her students really really liked her.

Really?


Yes really.....

This is from your article:

The Rhodes alumni letter was signed by students who graduated as far back as 1959, and some who knew Barrett and were in her graduating class. It expresses concerns that she might vote to overturn or "seriously curtail" Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court ruling that declared abortion a constitutional right.

You letter was signed by people who never had her.

I, personally, know three people who studied under her and found her to be very clear in her teachings.
 
Well, starting in about three weeks, you'll see if your basement driven concern is real.

Yeah, kind of bad form for you guys to have hearings when you haven't taken care of Covid Aid for the millions of unemployed... it almost looks like you are trying to ram through the nomination.

Not to worry, at the rate that GOP Senators are dropping from the Covid, you probably won't have hearings.

Ah yes...the fairy tale.

But this thread is about how those your worship hate the constitution.

You have statements on record by those who are senators (including your slut VP nominee) saying they won't vote for a nominee who won't agree to sustain certain decisions.

Clearly dissolving the separation of powers.

Instead, you are more worried about some stupid TV program.
 
Amy Comey Barrett has stated that judges should just do whatever the heck they want and ignore previous law. She's about as anti-constistution as they come, being that she's promised to do what her religion says instead of what the law says.
 
Amy Comey Barrett has stated that judges should just do whatever the heck they want and ignore previous law. She's about as anti-constistution as they come, being that she's promised to do what her religion says instead of what the law says.

Can you please provide that quote.
 

If we look at the current positions of the modern Democratic Party, it is clear that they do not share Amy Coney Barrett’s originalist point of view. In fact, their current rhetoric demonstrates that they are far beyond merely despising the philosophy of originalism. Instead, they are actively working to radically and fundamentally transform the Constitution into an unrecognizable monstrosity.

As has already been pointed out, by Turley...this is the case.

They keep pushing the idea that justices can't rule to reverse "progress" and that they have to rule the way the senate wants them to vote.

The democrats seem to have lost all sense of the purpose of the court.

What a stupid rant.
Nobody's trampled on the Constitution more than Fat Boy, who's wheezing at Walter Reed right now because he's too fucking arrogant to wear a mask.
Barrett is a hard-liner who is going to insure that you will be paying a lot more in taxes for fostering children and welfare mothers after this Court, which is supposed to be apolitical in the first place, reverses Roe v Wade.
THAT is why Dems don't like her.

Sorry, but you have the slut you are running as VP saying she won't vote for a judge who won't swear allegiance to Roe.

If you don't understand how that is a total fail, maybe you should get off the board and do some reading.

Post a link to those exact words from Harris or sit your fat ass down and STFU, liar.
Here's what Harris said (because I DO read).

Now show us that YOU read:

Kamala Harris says appointing Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court would imperil health care and abortion rights.

"“This relentless obsession with overturning the Affordable Care Act is driven entirely by a blind rage toward President Obama,” Ms. Harris, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, said. “And it’s happening at a moment when our country is suffering through the ravages of a pandemic that has claimed more than 200,000 lives in our country.”

"“Judge Barrett has a long record of opposing abortion and reproductive rights,” she continued. “There is no other issue that so disrespects and dishonors the work of Justice Ginsburg’s life than undoing the seminal decision in the court’s history that made it clear a woman has a right to make decisions about her own body.”""""


EXACTLY what I expressed in my previous post, you fucking idiot.
 

If we look at the current positions of the modern Democratic Party, it is clear that they do not share Amy Coney Barrett’s originalist point of view. In fact, their current rhetoric demonstrates that they are far beyond merely despising the philosophy of originalism. Instead, they are actively working to radically and fundamentally transform the Constitution into an unrecognizable monstrosity.

As has already been pointed out, by Turley...this is the case.

They keep pushing the idea that justices can't rule to reverse "progress" and that they have to rule the way the senate wants them to vote.

The democrats seem to have lost all sense of the purpose of the court.

What a stupid rant.
Nobody's trampled on the Constitution more than Fat Boy, who's wheezing at Walter Reed right now because he's too fucking arrogant to wear a mask.
Barrett is a hard-liner who is going to insure that you will be paying a lot more in taxes for fostering children and welfare mothers after this Court, which is supposed to be apolitical in the first place, reverses Roe v Wade.
THAT is why Dems don't like her.

Once again.....

If Roe is overturned......it will still be legalized in most states.

What part of that don't you understand.

Many commentators on both sides have said for the past two decades....Roe is dead.

In states like Nebraska, they have slowly hemmed in abortion with small state laws.

The left won't challenge them becuase they don't want a case going to the SCOTUS because they are worried it will be overturned.
 

If we look at the current positions of the modern Democratic Party, it is clear that they do not share Amy Coney Barrett’s originalist point of view. In fact, their current rhetoric demonstrates that they are far beyond merely despising the philosophy of originalism. Instead, they are actively working to radically and fundamentally transform the Constitution into an unrecognizable monstrosity.

As has already been pointed out, by Turley...this is the case.

They keep pushing the idea that justices can't rule to reverse "progress" and that they have to rule the way the senate wants them to vote.

The democrats seem to have lost all sense of the purpose of the court.
That's exactly right.

It's NEVER the face they claim to HATE !!!!

That face is ever changing.

It is this Great Nation that they actually HATE.

The American Left is the biggest Enemy this Great Nation faces today.
 
Amy Comey Barrett has stated that judges should just do whatever the heck they want and ignore previous law. She's about as anti-constistution as they come, being that she's promised to do what her religion says instead of what the law says.

Can you please provide that quote.


"""“If anything, the public response to controversial cases like Roe (v. Wade) reflects public rejection of the proposition that (precedent) can declare a permanent victor in a divisive constitutional struggle rather than desire that precedent remain forever unchanging. Court watchers embrace the possibility of overruling, even if they may want it to be the exception rather than the rule.” — 2013 article in the Texas Law Review, citing Roe v. Wade, the 1973 landmark ruling that recognized a woman’s right to abortion.""""

 

If we look at the current positions of the modern Democratic Party, it is clear that they do not share Amy Coney Barrett’s originalist point of view. In fact, their current rhetoric demonstrates that they are far beyond merely despising the philosophy of originalism. Instead, they are actively working to radically and fundamentally transform the Constitution into an unrecognizable monstrosity.

As has already been pointed out, by Turley...this is the case.

They keep pushing the idea that justices can't rule to reverse "progress" and that they have to rule the way the senate wants them to vote.

The democrats seem to have lost all sense of the purpose of the court.

What a stupid rant.
Nobody's trampled on the Constitution more than Fat Boy, who's wheezing at Walter Reed right now because he's too fucking arrogant to wear a mask.
Barrett is a hard-liner who is going to insure that you will be paying a lot more in taxes for fostering children and welfare mothers after this Court, which is supposed to be apolitical in the first place, reverses Roe v Wade.
THAT is why Dems don't like her.

Once again.....

If Roe is overturned......it will still be legalized in most states.

What part of that don't you understand.

Many commentators on both sides have said for the past two decades....Roe is dead.

In states like Nebraska, they have slowly hemmed in abortion with small state laws.

The left won't challenge them becuase they don't want a case going to the SCOTUS because they are worried it will be overturned.


I'm sorry, but your opinion doesn't mean jack shit, and you're contradicting yourself, too.
 

Forum List

Back
Top