Democrats seem to want a predominately brown America…why don’t they sell us on it by showing us all the safe, clean and successful brown communities?

This is crazy! The color of ones skin is as relevant as the color of your hair. There is virtually no difference between the so called races of Homo Sapiens. There is slightly more genetic variety among people of pure African descent, and people of pure African descent do not have any Neanderthal ancestry. But its ultimately meaningless. Europeans still had dark skin until about 15,000 years ago. Their skin grew lighter to get more Vitamin D from the sun which is not as direct in Europe as it is in Africa, where all Homo Sapiens descend from.
Skin color determines how a culture treats a person. With so many variations in shades, it is losing it's effectiveness in identification. Race is assigned by the person not the state. So on government documents, the person can claim to be white, black, mixed race or prefer to specify nothing. It is becoming a matter of opinion for much of the population. On the short form birth certificate race is not include. On the long form, race of each parent is included but today the information is provided by the parents which is no longer required.
 
Yeah, it's not the skin color that is doing all the crimes; it's the black people doing the crimes.
No, it’s that the crimes are disproportionally committed by non whites. This is a fact that irks your safe space and you try feelings as a dismissal method.
 
Think about the wealth that could have been passed down to the generations of those who followed the successful black businesspeople in Tulsa. How that wealth, the connections to fellow successful people, the networking, the opportunities it could have created could have changed the lives of thousands. How it could have affected the self esteem of those families.
That is what you need to consider when thinking about how racism has suppressed the potential advancement of black people in the US. The ripple affect poverty has from one generation to the next.
Your post is worthless. It's based entirely on your assumptions.

Blacks people "may have..." "Could have..." "Should have..." "Would have..."

There is NOT a bit of proof that any of your countless assumptions contained even a grain of truth.

There is NO possible way you could predict the future outcome for even a single life - much less an entire group of people.

YOU assume all those blacks would have been successful. YOU assume they would all have acquired wealth. YOU assume they all would have had wealth to pass down. But all of your assumptions wouldn't even buy you a cup of coffee. They are worthless.
 
No, it’s that the crimes are disproportionally committed by non whites. This is a fact that irks your safe space and you try feelings as a dismissal method.
Is the first sentence any different from what I said?
 
Would anyone object to their community, city state or nation turning brown if there was data that proved that brown communities, cities, states and nations were law abiding, safe, clean and prosperous?
Come on Democrats….sell us….show us the data.
Problem is there are no safe brown communities in the United States
 
You sure do…you teach Mexicos kids in America and you willingly FUCK Americans over to do so. GOOD JOB GLOBALIST!
You think there is only so much education, and if Mexicans receive some, others will have to do without. You're a hateful little peabrained idiot, aren't you?
 
The Republicans reinforce the idea that taking away a person's rights is justified because you disagree with who they have sex with when that person is perfectly legal to make that decision for themselves.

I'd stand up for a straight guy that is getting hassled by a gay dude that was telling him he shoud only have homosexual sex also.
where?
 
Of course I have. I've been to more places than you've ever even seen on TV.
Hahaha…If that were true you couldn’t play stupid…you’d know why California has become Mexifornia / North Mexico.
1EBD748D-EA8A-4D82-9B4B-DF0143A0EEA9.jpeg

AD7FB4E8-5633-4C4B-A530-0CC30799886E.jpeg
 
Oh yeah, a T-shirt. Compelling "evidence." :rolleyes:

Go think up a few more asinine, childish terms that mean NOTHING.
 
Skin color determines how a culture treats a person. With so many variations in shades, it is losing it's effectiveness in identification. Race is assigned by the person not the state. So on government documents, the person can claim to be white, black, mixed race or prefer to specify nothing. It is becoming a matter of opinion for much of the population. On the short form birth certificate race is not include. On the long form, race of each parent is included but today the information is provided by the parents which is no longer required.
Before 1400 AD, it's very hard to find examples of racism, where skin color is used as a way to label someone. This is before the European Slave Trade and discovery of the America's. Sure there are ethnic war's and fights between people, but race, White, Black, East Asian, Native American is not a factor. It may be an easy way to identify someone initially, but its meaning is not much more than hair color or eye color. Segregation, and discrimination is passed down and learned from generation to generation, but its hold on society is weakening. Stereotypes from the past persist, especially in certain areas and regions, but it is getting weaker. Europe's rapid increase in wealth, trade, exploration, and colonization and the disparity that developed between Europe and much of the rest of the world in terms of capabilities, led to false beliefs about being WHITE as something special or superior. Its leaders, and merchants with these attitudes, with a desire to maximize their wealth, that came up with ideas that it was ok to enslave or subjugate people of color because at the time their societies were more primitive and less advanced.
 
Would anyone object to their community, city state or nation turning brown if there was data that proved that brown communities, cities, states and nations were law abiding, safe, clean and prosperous?
Come on Democrats….sell us….show us the data.

El Paso, a city full of Hispanics and one of the safest places to live:





American foreign policy with all of its sanctions, coups, and threats of war, leads to more illegal immigration. Honduras in 2009 had a president named Manuel Zelaya that actually cared about his people and was going to build the nation's infrastructure. He was labeled by American politicians as "too socialist", because he didn't want to toe the line with foreign companies exploiting Honduras for cheap labor and resources. He was going to invest in local companies and allow his nation to own its own resources. He was ousted by an American-led coup d'etat, and Honduras is now in a much worse situation than it was in 2009. There are now more illegal immigrants coming to this country from Honduras than ever before. The US government's foreign policy creates more illegal immigration and it does it with the support of all of the MAGA hat-wearing rednecks that are constantly whining about illegal immigration. If Bubba doesn't want more illegal immigration from Latin America, all of those "brown people" coming here and taking jobs away from working-class white folks, then stop imposing economic sanctions on Latin American countries and orchestrating coups. Stop meddling in the political life and affairs of these countries and let them develop, that way the brown people that you hate so much, will stay over there and not come here.


7120-120_TheLoneWolfMullet-scaled.jpg
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top