Demwits now criticizing Trump for undermining Travel Ban

jwoodie

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2012
19,715
8,491
940
With the recent terrorist attacks in the UK making a mockery of their ridiculous attitude towards radical Islamists, the Demwits have completely reversed themselves and now support travel restrictions on recognized terrorist nations. However, their duplicitous hypocrisy still can't allow them to support any Trump policy, no matter how meritorious. Therefor, they have seized upon a meaningless distinction between the words "restriction" and "ban" and using that as a basis for attacking Trump while tacitly supporting his policy at the same time!

How anyone with a three digit IQ can swallow their BS can only be explained by Trump Derangement Syndrome (which should be added to DSM-5).
 
We get it, your SafeSpace isn't connected to reality in any way.

So, tell us more about these Democrat-supported travel bans. Was it your voices that told you about them?
 
With the recent terrorist attacks in the UK making a mockery of their ridiculous attitude towards radical Islamists, the Demwits have completely reversed themselves and now support travel restrictions on recognized terrorist nations. However, their duplicitous hypocrisy still can't allow them to support any Trump policy, no matter how meritorious. Therefor, they have seized upon a meaningless distinction between the words "restriction" and "ban" and using that as a basis for attacking Trump while tacitly supporting his policy at the same time!

How anyone with a three digit IQ can swallow their BS can only be explained by Trump Derangement Syndrome (which should be added to DSM-5).

Concrete thinkers do not have three digit IQ's
jwoodie is a concrete thinker
Thus, jwoodie does not have a three digit IQ (it may even be below 90).
 
With the recent terrorist attacks in the UK making a mockery of their ridiculous attitude towards radical Islamists, the Demwits have completely reversed themselves and now support travel restrictions on recognized terrorist nations. However, their duplicitous hypocrisy still can't allow them to support any Trump policy, no matter how meritorious. Therefor, they have seized upon a meaningless distinction between the words "restriction" and "ban" and using that as a basis for attacking Trump while tacitly supporting his policy at the same time!

How anyone with a three digit IQ can swallow their BS can only be explained by Trump Derangement Syndrome (which should be added to DSM-5).

Concrete thinkers do not have three digit IQ's
jwoodie is a concrete thinker
Thus, jwoodie does not have a three digit IQ (it may even be below 90).
aww look, more ad homs. How quaint :rolleyes:
you wouldn't know self awareness if it penetrated your vagina
 
With the recent terrorist attacks in the UK making a mockery of their ridiculous attitude towards radical Islamists, the Demwits have completely reversed themselves and now support travel restrictions on recognized terrorist nations. However, their duplicitous hypocrisy still can't allow them to support any Trump policy, no matter how meritorious. Therefor, they have seized upon a meaningless distinction between the words "restriction" and "ban" and using that as a basis for attacking Trump while tacitly supporting his policy at the same time!

How anyone with a three digit IQ can swallow their BS can only be explained by Trump Derangement Syndrome (which should be added to DSM-5).

Concrete thinkers do not have three digit IQ's
jwoodie is a concrete thinker
Thus, jwoodie does not have a three digit IQ (it may even be below 90).

aww look, more ad homs. How quaint :rolleyes:
you wouldn't know self awareness if it penetrated your vagina

Yep, but much more clever than calling an entire set of Democrats "Demwits" and creating a false narrative; lying when accusing "Demwits" of being duplicitous hypocrites, when it is self evident Trump contradicted his spokespersons on the use of ban vis a vis restrictions, or your foolish comment about a vagina.

I know very well when I attack the person and not their argument - arguments by a Rightard (luv that word) do not meet the standard of an argument, since most are echo's of propaganda or the current meme. Thus, my attack on the person is not a true ad hominem, something you should know, if you had ever completed high school.
 

Forum List

Back
Top