Did President Trump Give the Order to Liquidate the Iranian General?

[Alexandre Fedorovski]

A couple of years ago, one of the CNN programs featured three of the country's leading political experts. They were asked IF the White House is in the control of the Pentagon.

All three experts unequivocally answered "NO".

In this regard, there is another interpretation of events related to the act of state terrorism committed by the United States in Bagdad:

Version One.
Pro-Zionist circles in the US political elite decided to provoke a US war with Iran, the Pentagon or another special service decided to eliminate Iran's military commander, Gen Qasem Soleimani. That was done, POST FACTUM the President was informed about the assasination and HAD to take responsibility for it.

Version Two:
Representatives of the Democratic Party (historically, the Party of War) in the special services made a conspiracy to assasinate the Iranian general, post-factum notifying the President.The criminal plan was carried out and ANOTHER campaign to compromise Trump was launched in the Lower House of the Congress.

Judging by the development of events, the second version is more "viable"...

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Tinfoil/10

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

Trump was servicing Jared when the young Hebrew came up with the idea.

 

[Hossfly]

A couple of years ago, one of the CNN programs featured three of the country's leading political experts. They were asked IF the White House is in the control of the Pentagon.

All three experts unequivocally answered "NO".

POTUS is CIC. The three political "experts" are dead wrong.

 

[Alexandre Fedorovski]

Trump was servicing Jared when the young Hebrew came up with the idea.

MIGHT be the case... Or worse:

the son-inlaw was intriguing behind his father-in-law...

 

[Alexandre Fedorovski]

Tinfoil/10

 

[Sunni Man]

The Israeli zionist jews have been lobbying the U.S. government for years to take out Iran for them.

Looks like it's finally gonna happen. ...

 

[White 6]

A couple of years ago, one of the CNN programs featured three of the country's leading political experts. They were asked IF the White House is in the control of the Pentagon.

All three experts unequivocally answered "NO".

In this regard, there is another interpretation of events related to the act of state terrorism committed by the United States in Bagdad:

Version One.
Pro-Zionist circles in the US political elite decided to provoke a US war with Iran, the Pentagon or another special service decided to eliminate Iran's military commander, Gen Qasem Soleimani. That was done, POST FACTUM the President was informed about the assasination and HAD to take responsibility for it.

Version Two:
Representatives of the Democratic Party (historically, the Party of War) in the special services made a conspiracy to assasinate the Iranian general, post-factum notifying the President.The criminal plan was carried out and ANOTHER campaign to compromise Trump was launched in the Lower House of the Congress.

Judging by the development of events, the second version is more "viable"...

Shouldn't this be moved to conspiracy forum. Take your meds, man take your meds

 

[skye]

The Israeli zionist jews have been lobbying the U.S. government for years to take out Iran for them.

Looks like it's finally gonna happen. ...

ok you don't like that

so let's take out the Sunnis next




you like that better?

 

[Sunni Man]

Iran is the last middle east country standing in the zionist's way towards achieving their goal of stealing enough land to build a Greater Israel. ...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

A couple of years ago, one of the CNN programs featured three of the country's leading political experts. They were asked IF the White House is in the control of the Pentagon.

All three experts unequivocally answered "NO".

In this regard, there is another interpretation of events related to the act of state terrorism committed by the United States in Bagdad:

Version One.
Pro-Zionist circles in the US political elite decided to provoke a US war with Iran, the Pentagon or another special service decided to eliminate Iran's military commander, Gen Qasem Soleimani. That was done, POST FACTUM the President was informed about the assasination and HAD to take responsibility for it.

Version Two:
Representatives of the Democratic Party (historically, the Party of War) in the special services made a conspiracy to assasinate the Iranian general, post-factum notifying the President.The criminal plan was carried out and ANOTHER campaign to compromise Trump was launched in the Lower House of the Congress.

Judging by the development of events, the second version is more "viable"...

In this regard, there is another interpretation of events related to the act of state terrorism committed by the United States in Bagdad:

What act are you confused about?

special services made a conspiracy to assasinate the Iranian general,

Killing a terrorist isn't an assassination.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Iran is the last middle east country standing in the zionist's way towards achieving their goal of stealing enough land to build a Greater Israel. ...

That's outrageous!!

Only Muslims are allowed to steal land.

 

[Sandy Shanks]

Almost everyone knows that imminent is definitive. It means that something, usually a harmful event, is happening soon.

"Those attacks were imminent," Pompeo told CBS News.

Asked about the plot concerning a threat to our embassies in an interview on Fox News that aired Thursday night, Pompeo said, "We don't know precisely when, and we don't know precisely where, but it was real."

Our secretary of state does not even know what "imminent" means.

Yesterday, Trump said Soleimani was going to attack our Baghdad embassy. Today, Trump said Soleiman was going to attack four American embassies.

Trump has no idea what he is doing, and neither does his lackey, Pompeo.

 

[Sandy Shanks]

President Donald Trump told associates that he assassinated Iran's top military leader last week in part to appease Republican senators who'll play a crucial role in his Senate impeachment trial, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.

In a lengthy piece detailing how the president's top advisers coalesced behind the strike on Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, The Journal reported that Trump had told associates he felt pressured to satisfy senators who were pushing for stronger US action against Soleimani and who will run defense for him on impeachment.

Trump reportedly told associates he killed Qassem Soleimani because he was under pressure from GOP senators before his impeachment trial

 

[skye]

Iran is the last middle east country standing in the zionist's way towards achieving their goal of stealing enough land to build a Greater Israel. ...

so Sunnis like Shias now??? good, good news!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Almost everyone knows that imminent is definitive. It means that something, usually a harmful event, is happening soon.

"Those attacks were imminent," Pompeo told CBS News.

Asked about the plot concerning a threat to our embassies in an interview on Fox News that aired Thursday night, Pompeo said, "We don't know precisely when, and we don't know precisely where, but it was real."

Our secretary of state does not even know what "imminent" means.

Yesterday, Trump said Soleimani was going to attack our Baghdad embassy. Today, Trump said Soleiman was going to attack four American embassies.

Trump has no idea what he is doing, and neither does his lackey, Pompeo.

Are you sad when terrorists get killed?

 

[Hossfly]

Almost everyone knows that imminent is definitive. It means that something, usually a harmful event, is happening soon.

"Those attacks were imminent," Pompeo told CBS News.

Asked about the plot concerning a threat to our embassies in an interview on Fox News that aired Thursday night, Pompeo said, "We don't know precisely when, and we don't know precisely where, but it was real."

Our secretary of state does not even know what "imminent" means.

Yesterday, Trump said Soleimani was going to attack our Baghdad embassy. Today, Trump said Soleiman was going to attack four American embassies.

Trump has no idea what he is doing, and neither does his lackey, Pompeo.

We should get Trump and Pompeo out of there or we'll all be killed.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The Israeli zionist jews have been lobbying the U.S. government for years to take out Iran for them.

Looks like it's finally gonna happen. ...

I hope so.

 

[Alexandre Fedorovski]

The Israeli zionist jews have been lobbying the U.S. government for years to take out Iran for them.

Looks like it's finally gonna happen. ...

Once upon a time the Izraeli prime-minister said to its Knesset: "We CONTROL America!". Now the orthodox Jew "controls" the US President...

 

[Alexandre Fedorovski]

Almost everyone knows that imminent is definitive. It means that something, usually a harmful event, is happening soon.

"Those attacks were imminent," Pompeo told CBS News.

Asked about the plot concerning a threat to our embassies in an interview on Fox News that aired Thursday night, Pompeo said, "We don't know precisely when, and we don't know precisely where, but it was real."

Our secretary of state does not even know what "imminent" means.

Yesterday, Trump said Soleimani was going to attack our Baghdad embassy. Today, Trump said Soleiman was going to attack four American embassies.

Trump has no idea what he is doing, and neither does his lackey, Pompeo.

We should get Trump and Pompeo out of there or we'll all be killed.


View attachment 299593

It's NOT about Trump of Pompeo. It is ALL about cryptoneozionists and their raving obsession with irrepressible enrichment and planetary control