Did the Clinton Campaign Really Collude With Ukraine?

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
166,972
91,496
2,645
Native America
It’s important to remember that what’s ultimately concerning about Russiagate is the possibility that the Trump campaign—including staffers now employed in the White House by the president—worked with a hostile government whose leaders attempted to influence and disrupt the election with cyberattacks. The Chalupa story is about officials in an embassy passing along opposition research to a Democratic operative and reporters. The two episodes are not close to being the same, but that fact obviously won’t stop Trump’s supporters from deploying the story for yet another round of Clinton whataboutism.

Much More: Did the Clinton Campaign Really Collude With Ukraine?

No! This is like comparing apples and oranges. They aren't even nearly equivalent.
 
It didn't matter. Hillary's incoherent security paved the way for a freaking high school nerd much less an international hacker to analyze her agenda and her cheating in the Sanders primary debates. The hackers knew more about the Hillary campaign than the DNC was willing to admit. Today's left wing whiners and fantasy addicts are just pawns in the international hacker agenda and you can bet that they are laughing every day/.
 
It was pure collusion between the DNC and Ukrainians, plain and simple. Now the new FBI Director Nominee has signaled he is willing to investigate once he's been confirmed.

BOOM! DNC Could Face Investigation Into Ukraine Ties if New FBI Director Confirmed

Fine. Let him look into it - but it's a "nothing burger"...
Hillary received millions from the Russians through the Clinton foundation. Tell me how well is the Clinton foundation doing now?
 
Considering the pro Ukrainian and anti Russian forces at work during the election included the co founder of CrowdStrike how the hell can anyone beleive that the Russians hacked the DNC.

Until government agencies examine those servers who in their right mind would believe employees of the DNC that it was the Russians?

:lmao:

Despite 17 agencies all agreeing. Oh wait. It wasn't 17.

:lol:
 
Ukraine is barely a nation. Nobody could have colluded with them for anything. Meanwhile, the massive communist superpower they share a border with has an army of sympathizers in the US (and Canada, tinydancer) trying to deflect blame onto the invaded victim. Putin is winning. BIGLY.
 
It’s important to remember that what’s ultimately concerning about Russiagate is the possibility that the Trump campaign—including staffers now employed in the White House by the president—worked with a hostile government whose leaders attempted to influence and disrupt the election with cyberattacks. The Chalupa story is about officials in an embassy passing along opposition research to a Democratic operative and reporters. The two episodes are not close to being the same, but that fact obviously won’t stop Trump’s supporters from deploying the story for yet another round of Clinton whataboutism.

Much More: Did the Clinton Campaign Really Collude With Ukraine?

No! This is like comparing apples and oranges. They aren't even nearly equivalent.
Wow.
Considering the pro Ukrainian and anti Russian forces at work during the election included the co founder of CrowdStrike how the hell can anyone beleive that the Russians hacked the DNC.

Until government agencies examine those servers who in their right mind would believe employees of the DNC that it was the Russians?

:lmao:

Despite 17 agencies all agreeing. Oh wait. It wasn't 17.

:lol:
4 agencies out of 4 in charge of investigating the hacking agreed that Russia did it.
That's a 100% success rate.

Meanwhile, zero agencies have even brought up the fake news about Ukraine - Hillary.
You lose 4-0, dumbbass.
 
It’s important to remember that what’s ultimately concerning about Russiagate is the possibility that the Trump campaign—including staffers now employed in the White House by the president—worked with a hostile government whose leaders attempted to influence and disrupt the election with cyberattacks. The Chalupa story is about officials in an embassy passing along opposition research to a Democratic operative and reporters. The two episodes are not close to being the same, but that fact obviously won’t stop Trump’s supporters from deploying the story for yet another round of Clinton whataboutism.

Much More: Did the Clinton Campaign Really Collude With Ukraine?

No! This is like comparing apples and oranges. They aren't even nearly equivalent.


Slate is a liberal rag. Not surprising that you would post such dung.
 
It’s important to remember that what’s ultimately concerning about Russiagate is the possibility that the Trump campaign—including staffers now employed in the White House by the president—worked with a hostile government whose leaders attempted to influence and disrupt the election with cyberattacks. The Chalupa story is about officials in an embassy passing along opposition research to a Democratic operative and reporters. The two episodes are not close to being the same, but that fact obviously won’t stop Trump’s supporters from deploying the story for yet another round of Clinton whataboutism.

Much More: Did the Clinton Campaign Really Collude With Ukraine?

No! This is like comparing apples and oranges. They aren't even nearly equivalent.
Holy shit. This is awesome to watch. A complete meltdown in real time.
 

Forum List

Back
Top