DNC chair candidates say Clinton lost because she talked too much about Trump

[Tom Horn]

She should have stuck to talking about policy and only spoken about Trump to point out how crazy he sounds. No thought out rebuttal, no respect given to his madness, just "are you people hearing this nonsense?"

You should know from your own mental problems that the psychopath was Hillary, not Trump. Have you ever heard of Trump throwing punches at his campaign manager, overturning tables of food, breaking a plasma TV with a champagne bottle like Hilly did after she conceded the election?

 

[hadit]

Just how stupid are the Democrats? Still counting . . . .

'Every leading contender to take over the Democratic National Committee believes Hillary Clinton focused too much on attacking Donald Trump at the expense of articulating an affirmative case for holding the White House. During their final showdown before the chairman’s election in Atlanta on Feb. 25, there was consensus that the party’s problems derive mainly from subpar organization and communication — not anything fundamental.

“We forgot to talk to people,” said Tom Perez, who was secretary of labor until last month and a finalist to be Clinton’s running mate last summer. “I’m a big believer in data analytics, but data analytics cannot supplant good old fashioned door knocking. … We didn’t communicate our values to people. When Donald Trump says, ‘I’m going to bring the coal jobs back,’ we know that’s a lie. But people understand that he feels their pain. And our response was: ‘Vote for us because he’s crazy.’ I’ll stipulate to that, but that’s not a message.”'

The Daily 202: DNC chair candidates say Clinton lost because she talked too much about Trump

So Perez shows he has half a functioning brain, but only half. He is quite correct that Clinton lost the election because she spent too much time talking about Trump instead of articulating an affirmative message that addressed voters needs and problems, but then he says, using the coal miners as an example, we really had nothing to offer them other than "I feel your pain," thus displaying the empty space in his head where the other half of his brain should be. The coal miners didn't vote for Trump because they believed he felt their pain but because they believed he would try to get their jobs back for them, Tom. Nobody cares what your values are, Tom, if you don't have an agenda that will address their needs.

.
After 'denial' and 'anger', introspection is sort of the next step in the grieving process. They are still working on the specifics of how these therapy sessions should work. The Politico chimed in with a similar 'we are not listening to the people' theme just today (this is probably coordinated).

‘Data-Driven’ Campaigns Are Killing the Democratic Party

"We Democrats have allowed microtargeting to become microthinking. Each cycle, we speak to fewer and fewer people and have less and less to say......The campaign considered Bill to be old school—a storyteller, not data driven. I feel his pain. And unless Democrats start to change things quickly, we’ll be feeling pain in elections yet to come."

The problem is, when ever the Democrat Cranium Command talks to people, they are speaking in far left tongue to a voting population which is not far left, and when they listen to people, they ignore anything which does not fit their far left bubble mindset.

I wish them luck in grief therapy.

Not only that, but most politicians' speech today is so focus group tested to avoid offending anyone that it literally means nothing to anyone. That's one reason Trump was able to beat her. Sure he was a pompous, arrogant jerk on the campaign trail, but he seemed genuine, and people liked that even while they didn't like him so much.