Do liberals know or care the reason merrick garland not being judge was biden?

[Theowl32]

Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate.



We know the left don't care. We get that. They are ignorant hypocritical loud mouths. Nothing but losers.

Just listen to the speech. That for conservarives when those fuckers try to equate merrick garland and this disgraceful display.

 

[miketx]

No they don't use facts.

 

[rightwinger]

Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate.



We know the left don't care. We get that. They are ignorant hypocritical loud mouths. Nothing but losers.

Just listen to the speech. That for conservarives when those fuckers try to equate merrick garland and this disgraceful display.

No such thing as a Biden Rule

Never happened

 

[rightwinger]

The McConnell Rule says the Senate is under no obligation to fill a vacant Supreme Court seat

 

[The VOR]

Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate.



We know the left don't care. We get that. They are ignorant hypocritical loud mouths. Nothing but losers.

Just listen to the speech. That for conservarives when those fuckers try to equate merrick garland and this disgraceful display.

Stop all of your whining!

You're winning!!!
You're winning!!!

 

[Wry Catcher]

Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate.



We know the left don't care. We get that. They are ignorant hypocritical loud mouths. Nothing but losers.

Just listen to the speech. That for conservarives when those fuckers try to equate merrick garland and this disgraceful display.

McConnell followed the Biden comment, until he didn't.

The hypocrisy and dishonesty of McConnell has proved B. Franklin's fear, that we got a Republic, if we could keep it.

It's almost as if Mr. Franklin saw the future imagined a bum like McConnell destroying what so many have given their life to defend.

 

[forkup]

Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate.



We know the left don't care. We get that. They are ignorant hypocritical loud mouths. Nothing but losers.

Just listen to the speech. That for conservarives when those fuckers try to equate merrick garland and this disgraceful display.

Do you care that when he made that speech there where actually no vacant spots? Do you care that his speech was made 3 months later in the election cycle then when Garland was nominated? Do you care that his speech didn't say that the president couldn't select a nominee, but simply that the nomination process itself should be postponed until after the election during the lame duck session? Do you care that he made that speech as a response to the other time that the GOP choose to push someone through that was accused of sexual impropriety? Do you care that Mcconell just invoked Biden's name so he could justify holding open the seat for 400 days?

 

[The VOR]

The McConnell Rule says the Senate is under no obligation to fill a vacant Supreme Court seat

So much so, that they were fine with it being vacant for over a year. I didn't hear the nutters complaining then.

 

[Defiant1]

Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate.



We know the left don't care. We get that. They are ignorant hypocritical loud mouths. Nothing but losers.

Just listen to the speech. That for conservarives when those fuckers try to equate merrick garland and this disgraceful display.

Do you care that when he made that speech there where actually no vacant spots? Do you care that his speech was made 3 months later in the election cycle then when Garland was nominated? Do you care that his speech didn't say that the president couldn't select a nominee, but simply that the nomination process itself should be postponed until after the election during the lame duck session? Do you care that he made that speech as a response to the other time that the GOP choose to push someone through that was accused of sexual impropriety? Do you care that Mcconell just invoked Biden's name so he could justify holding open the seat for 400 days?

No.
I rejoiced that the magic negro failed to get his false nominee confirmed.
And it made it even sweeter that the democrat party tried to use it against Republicans to get hitlery elected.
another fail....

 

[rightwinger]

The McConnell Rule says the Senate is under no obligation to fill a vacant Supreme Court seat

So much so, that they were fine with it being vacant for over a year. I didn't hear the nutters complaining then.

We will suffer from the McConnell Rule from now on as vacancies are left vacant waiting for the right President

 

[LoneLaugher]

Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate.



We know the left don't care. We get that. They are ignorant hypocritical loud mouths. Nothing but losers.

Just listen to the speech. That for conservarives when those fuckers try to equate merrick garland and this disgraceful display.

Bullshit.

 

[forkup]

Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate.



We know the left don't care. We get that. They are ignorant hypocritical loud mouths. Nothing but losers.

Just listen to the speech. That for conservarives when those fuckers try to equate merrick garland and this disgraceful display.

Do you care that when he made that speech there where actually no vacant spots? Do you care that his speech was made 3 months later in the election cycle then when Garland was nominated? Do you care that his speech didn't say that the president couldn't select a nominee, but simply that the nomination process itself should be postponed until after the election during the lame duck session? Do you care that he made that speech as a response to the other time that the GOP choose to push someone through that was accused of sexual impropriety? Do you care that Mcconell just invoked Biden's name so he could justify holding open the seat for 400 days?

No.
I rejoiced that the magic negro failed to get his false nominee confirmed.
And it made it even sweeter that the democrat party tried to use it against Republicans to get hitlery elected.
another fail....

Sure, just don't try to sell it as anything but a naked refusal to perform the constitutional duty congress should perform. And don't try to peddle "Oh Biden gave the example", it's simply a bullshit argument.

 

[mdk]

Can anyone show me in the Senate rule book where the "Biden Rule" exists?

 

[hazlnut]

Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate.



We know the left don't care. We get that. They are ignorant hypocritical loud mouths. Nothing but losers.

Just listen to the speech. That for conservarives when those fuckers try to equate merrick garland and this disgraceful display.

Do you swallow other things besides lies.

There was no precedent.

Please tell us which year a twice-elected president nominated a judge with 12 mos left on his term and the majority party in the senate unilaterally refused to even hold hearings.

I'm waiting with baited breath...

 

[Defiant1]

Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate.



We know the left don't care. We get that. They are ignorant hypocritical loud mouths. Nothing but losers.

Just listen to the speech. That for conservarives when those fuckers try to equate merrick garland and this disgraceful display.

Do you care that when he made that speech there where actually no vacant spots? Do you care that his speech was made 3 months later in the election cycle then when Garland was nominated? Do you care that his speech didn't say that the president couldn't select a nominee, but simply that the nomination process itself should be postponed until after the election during the lame duck session? Do you care that he made that speech as a response to the other time that the GOP choose to push someone through that was accused of sexual impropriety? Do you care that Mcconell just invoked Biden's name so he could justify holding open the seat for 400 days?

No.
I rejoiced that the magic negro failed to get his false nominee confirmed.
And it made it even sweeter that the democrat party tried to use it against Republicans to get hitlery elected.
another fail....

Sure, just don't try to sell it as anything but a naked refusal to perform the constitutional duty congress should perform. And don't try to peddle "Oh Biden gave the example", it's simply a bullshit argument.

Don't give me your false bullshit.
There were no real complaints from the left until Nov. 8th.
No liberal wanted the moderate Garland.
You were all salivating that Hillary would win and she would nominate a real America hater to the court.
No one believed that Trump was going to win.

 

[miketx]

The McConnell Rule says the Senate is under no obligation to fill a vacant Supreme Court seat

So much so, that they were fine with it being vacant for over a year. I didn't hear the nutters complaining then.

We will suffer from the McConnell Rule from now on as vacancies are left vacant waiting for the right President

Just so you suffer, I'll be happy.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I’m pretty sure that if the Dems win control of the Senate in November, they will revert to the 60 vote standard for SC judges.

That’s because the Dems think big picture.

 

[forkup]

Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate.



We know the left don't care. We get that. They are ignorant hypocritical loud mouths. Nothing but losers.

Just listen to the speech. That for conservarives when those fuckers try to equate merrick garland and this disgraceful display.

Do you care that when he made that speech there where actually no vacant spots? Do you care that his speech was made 3 months later in the election cycle then when Garland was nominated? Do you care that his speech didn't say that the president couldn't select a nominee, but simply that the nomination process itself should be postponed until after the election during the lame duck session? Do you care that he made that speech as a response to the other time that the GOP choose to push someone through that was accused of sexual impropriety? Do you care that Mcconell just invoked Biden's name so he could justify holding open the seat for 400 days?

No.
I rejoiced that the magic negro failed to get his false nominee confirmed.
And it made it even sweeter that the democrat party tried to use it against Republicans to get hitlery elected.
another fail....

Sure, just don't try to sell it as anything but a naked refusal to perform the constitutional duty congress should perform. And don't try to peddle "Oh Biden gave the example", it's simply a bullshit argument.

Don't give me your false bullshit.
There were no real complaints from the left until Nov. 8th.
No liberal wanted the moderate Garland.
You were all salivating that Hillary would win and she would nominate a real America hater to the court.
No one believed that Trump was going to win.

First, again a bullshit argument. There was plenty of backlash. Secondly even if that was true it still doesn't change one iota of how much the GOP broke precedent and political and constitutional norms by refusing to even meet with Garland. It was naked partisan politics. Partisan politics that one day will bite the GOP in the ass.

 

[Defiant1]

I’m pretty sure that if the Dems win control of the Senate in November, they will revert to the 60 vote standard for SC judges.

That’s because the Dems think big picture.

Then Trump can nominate Hillary and we can investigate her again....
I don't think she'd get 60.

 

[rightwinger]

Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate.



We know the left don't care. We get that. They are ignorant hypocritical loud mouths. Nothing but losers.

Just listen to the speech. That for conservarives when those fuckers try to equate merrick garland and this disgraceful display.

Do you swallow other things besides lies.

There was no precedent.

Please tell us which year a twice-elected president nominated a judge with 12 mos left on his term and the majority party in the senate unilaterally refused to even hold hearings.

I'm waiting with baited breath...

Sounds like the McConnell Rule

Supreme Court selection will never be the same