Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
- 245
This is only true if, as I said, you can show that universal registration is an effective means to affect a compelling state iinterest, and is the least restrictive means to that end.
If for no other reason that felons and others legally unable to own a gun cannot, according to currenlt jurisprudence, be forced to register their guns, it cannot be shown that runiversal registration is an "effective means".
Thus, it is not just an infringement, but one that violates the constitution.
Which is clearly why the NRA, and their pet congressmen, pushed through legislation to attempt to ban federal government studies that would provide said proof.
There are many studies that have shown conclusively that around 85% of weapons used in crimes have been sold privately, without documentation.
Which is a clear indication that private undocumented sales of said weapons is a contributing factor to them being used in criminal activity, and thus a threat to public safety.
And, of course, the only sure way to find out is to do it.
Good for them,. The fact is that there are plenty of studies already in existence, many of them sponsored by pro registration groups, that admit that there is no evidence that registration would prevent crime. Why should we have the government spending money to prove something when other people already have?