Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmmmm. Japan only executed 8 people in 2013.
They have an incarceration rate of 51 per 100,000.
Ours is 707.
So that does not support Vigilante's "hang 'em high" theory.
There appears to be a correlation between poverty and crime.
Yet, we are one of the most prosperous nations on Earth. That means there are other countries which have a higher poverty rate than we do, but they have a lower incarceration rate.
What is the cause of this disparity?
Nope They just aren't breeding them.We had little problem controlling the prison population in the past...until fucked up liberals began with their shit!
So is that why other countries like Japan and France have such low incarceration rates? They are executing their inmates in bulk?
Should everyone get a Beemer? Or do we really expect the best when someone else is footing the bill?Yes. Its barbaric and unjust.
As long as its for-profit, people will get disproportionately long sentences.
As long as one's defense depends on the amount of money you have to spend, poor people will get disproportionately long sentences.
Even minor offenses can get solitary confinement for extended periods.
Hint for you, fuddley: If you want quality legal representation, stay in school and out of jail and keep your dick in your pants so you can afford it.
DNA? Lack of upbringing by two parents? Lack of parenting leads to bad citizenship in schools, bad grades, bad attitiudes. They are just fucked up as a race. Next in line comes the Mejicans.Yeah, I do...Negroes are more prone to a criminal lifestyle than other races with Mexicans coming in 2nd best as criminals.
Why are negroes more prone to a criminal lifestyle?
Minorities are twice as likely to be repeat offenders. That's one reason for their stiffer sentences.Should everyone get a Beemer? Or do we really expect the best when someone else is footing the bill?Yes. Its barbaric and unjust.
As long as its for-profit, people will get disproportionately long sentences.
As long as one's defense depends on the amount of money you have to spend, poor people will get disproportionately long sentences.
Even minor offenses can get solitary confinement for extended periods.
Hint for you, fuddley: If you want quality legal representation, stay in school and out of jail and keep your dick in your pants so you can afford it.
Your first post was so ignorant and stupid that I chose not to address it, however , it is apparent that you want to ride the stupid choo choo into the horizon.
Some facts ( those things that confuse you)
More minorities are jailed for the same crimes that whites are given probation for.
More minorities are given harsher sentences than whites when the offenses are the same.
Minorities are given sentences two to three times as long for selling crack cocaine vs. cocaine sold by whites.
Minorities are given harsher sentences for first time offenses than whites.
Whites are sentenced to probation at a higher rate than minorities.
Those above facts have an overwhelming effect on the number of individual races incarcerated.
Now on to the stupidity you have typed on this post.
It's idiots like you that make defenses such as "affluenza" totally acceptable as a defense against any crime committed by the individual.
You have said that people with less money should not receive equal protection under the law...is this some new interpretation of the U.S. Constitution by Conservatives?Repubs???
Do you usually try this hard to post opinions totally devoid of fact, law and precedent?
Yes! This is a major problem.The incarceration rate of the United States of America was the highest in the world, at 716 per 100,000 of the national population. While the United States represents about 5 percent of the world's population, it houses around 25 percent of the world's prisoners.
some links on this issue
Map 16 states have more people in prisons and jails than college housing - Vox
California Spending More On Prisons Than Colleges Report Says
The U.S. has more jails than colleges. Here 8217 s a map of where those prisoners live. - The Washington Post
I could go for legalizing all drugs. In fact, I would go as far as giving all heroin addicts a free year's supply, all at one time complete with free large bore needles.Simple way to reduce the prison population:
Free drugs.
All they want.
They, the inmates.
But no OD treatment.
Oh yeah, only American Made Drugs. At least a temporary boost in employment to meet the demand.
actually you did, you simply worded it differently.Minorities are twice as likely to be repeat offenders. That's one reason for their stiffer sentences.Should everyone get a Beemer? Or do we really expect the best when someone else is footing the bill?Yes. Its barbaric and unjust.
As long as its for-profit, people will get disproportionately long sentences.
As long as one's defense depends on the amount of money you have to spend, poor people will get disproportionately long sentences.
Even minor offenses can get solitary confinement for extended periods.
Hint for you, fuddley: If you want quality legal representation, stay in school and out of jail and keep your dick in your pants so you can afford it.
Your first post was so ignorant and stupid that I chose not to address it, however , it is apparent that you want to ride the stupid choo choo into the horizon.
Some facts ( those things that confuse you)
More minorities are jailed for the same crimes that whites are given probation for.
More minorities are given harsher sentences than whites when the offenses are the same.
Minorities are given sentences two to three times as long for selling crack cocaine vs. cocaine sold by whites.
Minorities are given harsher sentences for first time offenses than whites.
Whites are sentenced to probation at a higher rate than minorities.
Those above facts have an overwhelming effect on the number of individual races incarcerated.
Now on to the stupidity you have typed on this post.
It's idiots like you that make defenses such as "affluenza" totally acceptable as a defense against any crime committed by the individual.
You have said that people with less money should not receive equal protection under the law...is this some new interpretation of the U.S. Constitution by Conservatives?Repubs???
Do you usually try this hard to post opinions totally devoid of fact, law and precedent?
I didn't say it was right that some people have inferior representation. I only implied that you get what you pay for.
Would you be all for everyone driving the exact same car priced according to income? Or are you OK with some people paying $200,000 for a Rolls and others paying $400 for a used Hundae?
nice ideaSimple way to reduce the prison population:
Free drugs.
All they want.
They, the inmates.
But no OD treatment.
Oh yeah, only American Made Drugs. At least a temporary boost in employment to meet the demand.
One reason for the disparities between the races as far as sentencing go is the higher rates of recidivism among non-whites, meaning they have priors. This is just one example your conspiracy of white "racism" in the justice is bunk.Should everyone get a Beemer? Or do we really expect the best when someone else is footing the bill?Yes. Its barbaric and unjust.
As long as its for-profit, people will get disproportionately long sentences.
As long as one's defense depends on the amount of money you have to spend, poor people will get disproportionately long sentences.
Even minor offenses can get solitary confinement for extended periods.
Hint for you, fuddley: If you want quality legal representation, stay in school and out of jail and keep your dick in your pants so you can afford it.
Your first post was so ignorant and stupid that I chose not to address it, however , it is apparent that you want to ride the stupid choo choo into the horizon.
Some facts ( those things that confuse you)
More minorities are jailed for the same crimes that whites are given probation for.
More minorities are given harsher sentences than whites when the offenses are the same.
Minorities are given sentences two to three times as long for selling crack cocaine vs. cocaine sold by whites.
Minorities are given harsher sentences for first time offenses than whites.
Whites are sentenced to probation at a higher rate than minorities.
Those above facts have an overwhelming effect on the number of individual races incarcerated.
Now on to the stupidity you have typed on this post.
It's idiots like you that make defenses such as "affluenza" totally acceptable as a defense against any crime committed by the individual.
You have said that people with less money should not receive equal protection under the law...is this some new interpretation of the U.S. Constitution by Conservatives?Repubs???
Do you usually try this hard to post opinions totally devoid of fact, law and precedent?
Yeah, I do...Negroes are more prone to a criminal lifestyle than other races with Mexicans coming in 2nd best as criminals.
Why are negroes more prone to a criminal lifestyle?
The incarceration rate of the United States of America was the highest in the world, at 716 per 100,000 of the national population. While the United States represents about 5 percent of the world's population, it houses around 25 percent of the world's prisoners.
some links on this issue
Map 16 states have more people in prisons and jails than college housing - Vox
California Spending More On Prisons Than Colleges Report Says
The U.S. has more jails than colleges. Here 8217 s a map of where those prisoners live. - The Washington Post
One reason for the disparities between the races as far as sentencing go is the higher rates of recidivism among non-whites, meaning they have priors. This is just one example your conspiracy of white "racism" in the justice is bunk.Should everyone get a Beemer? Or do we really expect the best when someone else is footing the bill?Yes. Its barbaric and unjust.
As long as its for-profit, people will get disproportionately long sentences.
As long as one's defense depends on the amount of money you have to spend, poor people will get disproportionately long sentences.
Even minor offenses can get solitary confinement for extended periods.
Hint for you, fuddley: If you want quality legal representation, stay in school and out of jail and keep your dick in your pants so you can afford it.
Your first post was so ignorant and stupid that I chose not to address it, however , it is apparent that you want to ride the stupid choo choo into the horizon.
Some facts ( those things that confuse you)
More minorities are jailed for the same crimes that whites are given probation for.
More minorities are given harsher sentences than whites when the offenses are the same.
Minorities are given sentences two to three times as long for selling crack cocaine vs. cocaine sold by whites.
Minorities are given harsher sentences for first time offenses than whites.
Whites are sentenced to probation at a higher rate than minorities.
Those above facts have an overwhelming effect on the number of individual races incarcerated.
Now on to the stupidity you have typed on this post.
It's idiots like you that make defenses such as "affluenza" totally acceptable as a defense against any crime committed by the individual.
You have said that people with less money should not receive equal protection under the law...is this some new interpretation of the U.S. Constitution by Conservatives?Repubs???
Do you usually try this hard to post opinions totally devoid of fact, law and precedent?
List the "six other facts" with citation that show the disparity in sentencing between whites and blacks is due to racism in the justice system. Since your position is "common sense", the data should be readily available that verifies your position.One reason for the disparities between the races as far as sentencing go is the higher rates of recidivism among non-whites, meaning they have priors. This is just one example your conspiracy of white "racism" in the justice is bunk.Should everyone get a Beemer? Or do we really expect the best when someone else is footing the bill?Yes. Its barbaric and unjust.
As long as its for-profit, people will get disproportionately long sentences.
As long as one's defense depends on the amount of money you have to spend, poor people will get disproportionately long sentences.
Even minor offenses can get solitary confinement for extended periods.
Hint for you, fuddley: If you want quality legal representation, stay in school and out of jail and keep your dick in your pants so you can afford it.
Your first post was so ignorant and stupid that I chose not to address it, however , it is apparent that you want to ride the stupid choo choo into the horizon.
Some facts ( those things that confuse you)
More minorities are jailed for the same crimes that whites are given probation for.
More minorities are given harsher sentences than whites when the offenses are the same.
Minorities are given sentences two to three times as long for selling crack cocaine vs. cocaine sold by whites.
Minorities are given harsher sentences for first time offenses than whites.
Whites are sentenced to probation at a higher rate than minorities.
Those above facts have an overwhelming effect on the number of individual races incarcerated.
Now on to the stupidity you have typed on this post.
It's idiots like you that make defenses such as "affluenza" totally acceptable as a defense against any crime committed by the individual.
You have said that people with less money should not receive equal protection under the law...is this some new interpretation of the U.S. Constitution by Conservatives?Repubs???
Do you usually try this hard to post opinions totally devoid of fact, law and precedent?
It's amusing that when the situation calls for it, you easily abandon all pretense of common sense.
Your attempt at some rebuttal failed to mention at least six other facts concerning the disparity in sentencing, mainly the incidents of first time Black offenders receiving prison sentences while whites receive probation and/or treatment.
Your response was the typical deflection from accepted facts that some whites choose to ignore...
No problem, I can start with number one and continue, because there are those that lack the common sense to be aware of facts that are common.List the "six other facts" with citation that show the disparity in sentencing between whites and blacks is due to racism in the justice system. Since your position is "common sense", the data should be readily available that verifies your position.One reason for the disparities between the races as far as sentencing go is the higher rates of recidivism among non-whites, meaning they have priors. This is just one example your conspiracy of white "racism" in the justice is bunk.Should everyone get a Beemer? Or do we really expect the best when someone else is footing the bill?Yes. Its barbaric and unjust.
As long as its for-profit, people will get disproportionately long sentences.
As long as one's defense depends on the amount of money you have to spend, poor people will get disproportionately long sentences.
Even minor offenses can get solitary confinement for extended periods.
Hint for you, fuddley: If you want quality legal representation, stay in school and out of jail and keep your dick in your pants so you can afford it.
Your first post was so ignorant and stupid that I chose not to address it, however , it is apparent that you want to ride the stupid choo choo into the horizon.
Some facts ( those things that confuse you)
More minorities are jailed for the same crimes that whites are given probation for.
More minorities are given harsher sentences than whites when the offenses are the same.
Minorities are given sentences two to three times as long for selling crack cocaine vs. cocaine sold by whites.
Minorities are given harsher sentences for first time offenses than whites.
Whites are sentenced to probation at a higher rate than minorities.
Those above facts have an overwhelming effect on the number of individual races incarcerated.
Now on to the stupidity you have typed on this post.
It's idiots like you that make defenses such as "affluenza" totally acceptable as a defense against any crime committed by the individual.
You have said that people with less money should not receive equal protection under the law...is this some new interpretation of the U.S. Constitution by Conservatives?Repubs???
Do you usually try this hard to post opinions totally devoid of fact, law and precedent?
It's amusing that when the situation calls for it, you easily abandon all pretense of common sense.
Your attempt at some rebuttal failed to mention at least six other facts concerning the disparity in sentencing, mainly the incidents of first time Black offenders receiving prison sentences while whites receive probation and/or treatment.
Your response was the typical deflection from accepted facts that some whites choose to ignore...
Thanks...
