DOJ won't prosecute AG Garland for contempt for refusal to turn over audio from Biden, Hur interview

StatesRightsForever

Gold Member
May 1, 2024
491
596
Navarro and bannon go to prison for the same crime but not garland!!! The DOJ is all about politics. America has the right to hear this audio.

The Justice Department will not prosecute U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland over contempt, according to a letter sent from the agency to House Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday.

The House voted Wednesday to hold Garland in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over audio of President Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Hur.

The vote came after months of digging by House Republicans to try to bring into public view as much material from the special counsel interview as possible.
 
Navarro and bannon go to prison for the same crime but not garland!!! The DOJ is all about politics. America has the right to hear this audio.


You only have one right, and that is to lick the boots of the DNC.
 
Navarro and bannon go to prison for the same crime but not garland!!! The DOJ is all about politics. America has the right to hear this audio.


if "america has a right to hear the audio" i'm sure that alito will find some way for you to hear it, probably after lev parnas or o'heefe has added and rearranged a few things .
 
Navarro and bannon go to prison for the same crime but not garland!!! The DOJ is all about politics. America has the right to hear this audio.


I guess Garland like Biden is a well meaning, old fellow who doesn't really know what he's doing so leave him alone.
 
There's no legal justification to demand the tapes be turned over. They have the complete transcript.

The MAGGOTS just want to cherry pick the audio for political propaganda.
Hurr said he was incompetent to stand trial.

Briben willingly stole classified documents and shared them.

If the transcript is not adequate for not pressing charges, then the tapes are needed.
 
Navarro and bannon go to prison for the same crime but not garland!!! The DOJ is all about politics. America has the right to hear this audio.


This is AG Holder and "fast and furious" all over again.

Have you learned nothing?

The AG is the one who decides who gets prosecuted and who doesn't. And just like under Holder, the AG will not decide that he broke the law and should be prosecuted.
 
This is AG Holder and "fast and furious" all over again.

Have you learned nothing?

The AG is the one who decides who gets prosecuted and who doesn't. And just like under Holder, the AG will not decide that he broke the law and should be prosecuted.
The only thing we need to worry about is Trump, his whore, and bad bookkeeping.

Oh, and Biden's crack head son with a gun.

Everything else is Russian disinformation.
 
if "america has a right to hear the audio" i'm sure that alito will find some way for you to hear it, probably after lev parnas or o'heefe has added and rearranged a few things .

Garland is right to withhold the audio They have the transcript and thousands of pages of other documents. They only want the audio, so they can leak it, splice it, and make a political commercial out of it. And DOJ policy is not to take any action that will influence, so close to an election.
 
Navarro and bannon go to prison for the same crime but not garland!!! The DOJ is all about politics. America has the right to hear this audio.



It's a rigged game.

This can't be fixed playing by the rules.
 
Garland is right to withhold the audio They have the transcript and thousands of pages of other documents. They only want the audio, so they can leak it, splice it, and make a political commercial out of it. And DOJ policy is not to take any action that will influence, so close to an election.
Garland has all the power, so he can do anything he wants.

Yes, we know.

Congress be damned.
 
Garland has all the power, so he can do anything he wants.

Yes, we know.

Congress be damned.
This congress is hyper politicized. That was made clear by the Biden impeachment.
They essentially said, they needed the power of an impeachment inquirery, to get the evidence to impeach. Instead of getting the evidence, and then starting an impeachment based on actual evidence.
 

Forum List

Back
Top