Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
So, how long was she in prison for being a smart investor?
Hillary is not subject to the laws that govern Martha Stewart or Ken Lay.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, how long was she in prison for being a smart investor?
Hillary Clinton was thoroughly vetted by the Ken Starr Witch Hunt Committee. It only cost taxpayers around $60 million.
You're hysterical. Presidents are civilians, not subject to the ucmjAnd he's right. so does Millions of the people in the country. the women is under INVISTIGATION. You talk about someone spitting on us and flipping us all off. the fact she more than likely broke all kind of OUR LAWS.
she's just nasty and you're thinking of voting for that. it's shocking really
Shitting Bull serves the party. The good of the nation, civil rights, the rule of law, these are things the fake indian never even considers. Party above all.
Stephanie----I considered Hillary to be a LAW-BREAKER when she publically
defended BILL------on his sexual conduct with the little slut in the Oval office----
Bill was MILITARY ----commander in chief------his picture was displayed
ABOVE those of the Generals and Admirals in military bases. His conduct,
had he been a high ranking officer in the either branch (which technically,
he was) would have been a CRIME------and gotten him a dishonorable
discharge AND jail time. Hillary is a lawyer------she KNEW
And he's right. so does Millions of the people in the country. the women is under INVISTIGATION. You talk about someone spitting on us and flipping us all off. the fact she more than likely broke all kind of OUR LAWS.
she's just nasty and you're thinking of voting for that. it's shocking really
Shitting Bull serves the party. The good of the nation, civil rights, the rule of law, these are things the fake indian never even considers. Party above all.
Stephanie----I considered Hillary to be a LAW-BREAKER when she publically
defended BILL------on his sexual conduct with the little slut in the Oval office----
Bill was MILITARY ----commander in chief------his picture was displayed
ABOVE those of the Generals and Admirals in military bases. His conduct,
had he been a high ranking officer in the either branch (which technically,
he was) would have been a CRIME------and gotten him a dishonorable
discharge AND jail time. Hillary is a lawyer------she KNEW
You're hysterical. Presidents are civilians, not subject to the ucmj
Then your problem is with the ucmj, not the clintonsAnd he's right. so does Millions of the people in the country. the women is under INVISTIGATION. You talk about someone spitting on us and flipping us all off. the fact she more than likely broke all kind of OUR LAWS.
she's just nasty and you're thinking of voting for that. it's shocking really
Shitting Bull serves the party. The good of the nation, civil rights, the rule of law, these are things the fake indian never even considers. Party above all.
Stephanie----I considered Hillary to be a LAW-BREAKER when she publically
defended BILL------on his sexual conduct with the little slut in the Oval office----
Bill was MILITARY ----commander in chief------his picture was displayed
ABOVE those of the Generals and Admirals in military bases. His conduct,
had he been a high ranking officer in the either branch (which technically,
he was) would have been a CRIME------and gotten him a dishonorable
discharge AND jail time. Hillary is a lawyer------she KNEW
You're hysterical. Presidents are civilians, not subject to the ucmj
I am never hysterical----you are right----he is a civilian----I was addressing
the MORAL ISSUE ------his immunity from MILITARY PROSECUTION is
his LOOP-HOLE -------Hillary tried to excuse his act on MORALITY
GROUNDS. I see no morality in destroying the career and life of
a NAVY CAPTAIN------for the same act that HILLARY publically
declared "ok" for the convenience of HER CAREER. It ain't
TRUTH, JUSTICE, AND THE AMERICAN WAY
And he's right. so does Millions of the people in the country. the women is under INVISTIGATION. You talk about someone spitting on you and the fact she more than likely broke all kind of OUR LAWS.
she just nasty and you're thinking of voting for that. it's shocking really
Hilarious! You NaziCons call a witch hunt an investigation.
Then your problem is with the ucmj, not the clintonsAnd he's right. so does Millions of the people in the country. the women is under INVISTIGATION. You talk about someone spitting on us and flipping us all off. the fact she more than likely broke all kind of OUR LAWS.
she's just nasty and you're thinking of voting for that. it's shocking really
Shitting Bull serves the party. The good of the nation, civil rights, the rule of law, these are things the fake indian never even considers. Party above all.
Stephanie----I considered Hillary to be a LAW-BREAKER when she publically
defended BILL------on his sexual conduct with the little slut in the Oval office----
Bill was MILITARY ----commander in chief------his picture was displayed
ABOVE those of the Generals and Admirals in military bases. His conduct,
had he been a high ranking officer in the either branch (which technically,
he was) would have been a CRIME------and gotten him a dishonorable
discharge AND jail time. Hillary is a lawyer------she KNEW
You're hysterical. Presidents are civilians, not subject to the ucmj
I am never hysterical----you are right----he is a civilian----I was addressing
the MORAL ISSUE ------his immunity from MILITARY PROSECUTION is
his LOOP-HOLE -------Hillary tried to excuse his act on MORALITY
GROUNDS. I see no morality in destroying the career and life of
a NAVY CAPTAIN------for the same act that HILLARY publically
declared "ok" for the convenience of HER CAREER. It ain't
TRUTH, JUSTICE, AND THE AMERICAN WAY
Please, explain what you believe was hypocritical in her suppory of her husbandThen your problem is with the ucmj, not the clintonsShitting Bull serves the party. The good of the nation, civil rights, the rule of law, these are things the fake indian never even considers. Party above all.
Stephanie----I considered Hillary to be a LAW-BREAKER when she publically
defended BILL------on his sexual conduct with the little slut in the Oval office----
Bill was MILITARY ----commander in chief------his picture was displayed
ABOVE those of the Generals and Admirals in military bases. His conduct,
had he been a high ranking officer in the either branch (which technically,
he was) would have been a CRIME------and gotten him a dishonorable
discharge AND jail time. Hillary is a lawyer------she KNEW
You're hysterical. Presidents are civilians, not subject to the ucmj
I am never hysterical----you are right----he is a civilian----I was addressing
the MORAL ISSUE ------his immunity from MILITARY PROSECUTION is
his LOOP-HOLE -------Hillary tried to excuse his act on MORALITY
GROUNDS. I see no morality in destroying the career and life of
a NAVY CAPTAIN------for the same act that HILLARY publically
declared "ok" for the convenience of HER CAREER. It ain't
TRUTH, JUSTICE, AND THE AMERICAN WAY
no-----in that case my problem was with the HYPOCRACY of Hillary.
She hurt my feelings by pretending that his action was no deplorable
Please, explain what you believe was hypocritical in her suppory of her husbandThen your problem is with the ucmj, not the clintonsStephanie----I considered Hillary to be a LAW-BREAKER when she publically
defended BILL------on his sexual conduct with the little slut in the Oval office----
Bill was MILITARY ----commander in chief------his picture was displayed
ABOVE those of the Generals and Admirals in military bases. His conduct,
had he been a high ranking officer in the either branch (which technically,
he was) would have been a CRIME------and gotten him a dishonorable
discharge AND jail time. Hillary is a lawyer------she KNEW
You're hysterical. Presidents are civilians, not subject to the ucmj
I am never hysterical----you are right----he is a civilian----I was addressing
the MORAL ISSUE ------his immunity from MILITARY PROSECUTION is
his LOOP-HOLE -------Hillary tried to excuse his act on MORALITY
GROUNDS. I see no morality in destroying the career and life of
a NAVY CAPTAIN------for the same act that HILLARY publically
declared "ok" for the convenience of HER CAREER. It ain't
TRUTH, JUSTICE, AND THE AMERICAN WAY
no-----in that case my problem was with the HYPOCRACY of Hillary.
She hurt my feelings by pretending that his action was no deplorable
There is no loophole.Please, explain what you believe was hypocritical in her suppory of her husbandThen your problem is with the ucmj, not the clintonsYou're hysterical. Presidents are civilians, not subject to the ucmj
I am never hysterical----you are right----he is a civilian----I was addressing
the MORAL ISSUE ------his immunity from MILITARY PROSECUTION is
his LOOP-HOLE -------Hillary tried to excuse his act on MORALITY
GROUNDS. I see no morality in destroying the career and life of
a NAVY CAPTAIN------for the same act that HILLARY publically
declared "ok" for the convenience of HER CAREER. It ain't
TRUTH, JUSTICE, AND THE AMERICAN WAY
no-----in that case my problem was with the HYPOCRACY of Hillary.
She hurt my feelings by pretending that his action was no deplorable
I already explained it--------it is a crime for an ADMIRAL but not for her hubby on
an actually SLIM LOOPHOLE -------kinda like using DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY
against an arrest for a murder
There is no loophole.Please, explain what you believe was hypocritical in her suppory of her husbandThen your problem is with the ucmj, not the clintonsI am never hysterical----you are right----he is a civilian----I was addressing
the MORAL ISSUE ------his immunity from MILITARY PROSECUTION is
his LOOP-HOLE -------Hillary tried to excuse his act on MORALITY
GROUNDS. I see no morality in destroying the career and life of
a NAVY CAPTAIN------for the same act that HILLARY publically
declared "ok" for the convenience of HER CAREER. It ain't
TRUTH, JUSTICE, AND THE AMERICAN WAY
no-----in that case my problem was with the HYPOCRACY of Hillary.
She hurt my feelings by pretending that his action was no deplorable
I already explained it--------it is a crime for an ADMIRAL but not for her hubby on
an actually SLIM LOOPHOLE -------kinda like using DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY
against an arrest for a murder
You've made that up to justify your hate.
No civilian is subject to ucmj
I am never hysterical----you are right----he is a civilian----I was addressing
the MORAL ISSUE ------his immunity from MILITARY PROSECUTION is
his LOOP-HOLE -------Hillary tried to excuse his act on MORALITY
GROUNDS. I see no morality in destroying the career and life of
a NAVY CAPTAIN------for the same act that HILLARY publically
declared "ok" for the convenience of HER CAREER. It ain't
TRUTH, JUSTICE, AND THE AMERICAN WAY
the RW derail Hillary campaign is in full swing.
call Gowdy and ask how that's working out for him.
the best campaign tool Clinton has is the crap RW's keep yammering about.
too funny.
Again, it's not a loophole for someone who isn't in the military to not be subject to the ucmjThere is no loophole.Please, explain what you believe was hypocritical in her suppory of her husbandThen your problem is with the ucmj, not the clintons
no-----in that case my problem was with the HYPOCRACY of Hillary.
She hurt my feelings by pretending that his action was no deplorable
I already explained it--------it is a crime for an ADMIRAL but not for her hubby on
an actually SLIM LOOPHOLE -------kinda like using DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY
against an arrest for a murder
You've made that up to justify your hate.
No civilian is subject to ucmj
it is a loophole------the loophole is
"The commander in chief of the US military is a civilian" ------military
personnel have to SALUTE that 'civilian' My rank was Lcdr-----
I would have had to salute that jerk if I happened to walk in and catch the two
of them ENFLAGRANTE. I do not hate Clinton------I voted for the jerk---
I hated the way that incident was handled----he should have stepped down
rather than have wifey white-wash it
Again, it's not a loophole for someone who isn't in the military to not be subject to the ucmjThere is no loophole.Please, explain what you believe was hypocritical in her suppory of her husbandno-----in that case my problem was with the HYPOCRACY of Hillary.
She hurt my feelings by pretending that his action was no deplorable
I already explained it--------it is a crime for an ADMIRAL but not for her hubby on
an actually SLIM LOOPHOLE -------kinda like using DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY
against an arrest for a murder
You've made that up to justify your hate.
No civilian is subject to ucmj
it is a loophole------the loophole is
"The commander in chief of the US military is a civilian" ------military
personnel have to SALUTE that 'civilian' My rank was Lcdr-----
I would have had to salute that jerk if I happened to walk in and catch the two
of them ENFLAGRANTE. I do not hate Clinton------I voted for the jerk---
I hated the way that incident was handled----he should have stepped down
rather than have wifey white-wash it
Remember when Hillary turned $1,000 into $100,000 "trading commodities"?
So, how long was she in prison for being a smart investor?