Drone patrol instead of a wall?

[candycorn]

None of what you just said is remotely intelligent much less truthful. ....?

Really? You deny that Trump is an excessive user of hyperbole?

He’s an excessive liar.

You deny that it is valid for people to dislike Trump's style?

Sure people don’t like being lied to. You seem to enjoy it like a good little poodle.

Maybe your master will toss you a tennis ball when he gets home if you hadn’t peed on the carpet.

You made a claim, an absurd claim that Trump is not an excessive user of hyperbole.


I've asked you to support that, and you have not even tried to.


Dude. if you ever had any credibility, you just flushed it.



You are LYING.

No fuck face, he’s not an excessive user of hyperbole. He’s an excessive liar.

You just lied. The irony here is bigger than the whole of the planet Earth.
Trump is an excessive user of hyperbole. ONly a liar could claim otherwise.

Ok…where are the tax returns. He said he would release them after the audit. So either the audit of his 2015 taxes has taken 4 years or he is lying.

Here is the definition of hyperbole.

hy·per·bo·le
/hīˈpərbəlē/
noun

1. exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.
   
   
   So that isn’t an exaggeration…he said he would release the tax returns after the audit.
   Where are they?
   
   Oh that’s right…he’s not exaggerating. He’s a liar.
   

 

[Correll]

Really? You deny that Trump is an excessive user of hyperbole?

He’s an excessive liar.

You deny that it is valid for people to dislike Trump's style?

Sure people don’t like being lied to. You seem to enjoy it like a good little poodle.

Maybe your master will toss you a tennis ball when he gets home if you hadn’t peed on the carpet.

You made a claim, an absurd claim that Trump is not an excessive user of hyperbole.


I've asked you to support that, and you have not even tried to.


Dude. if you ever had any credibility, you just flushed it.



You are LYING.

No fuck face, he’s not an excessive user of hyperbole. He’s an excessive liar.

You just lied. The irony here is bigger than the whole of the planet Earth.
Trump is an excessive user of hyperbole. ONly a liar could claim otherwise.

Ok…where are the tax returns. He said he would release them after the audit. ....

Your position is that he is not an excessive user of hyperbole. Finding one possible lie, does not support that position.


I don't know HOW you would support your position, seeing as how it is utterly absurd, but your attempt so far, is more pathetic than a blind man trying to find a grain of rice he lost in a snow storm.

 

[candycorn]

He’s an excessive liar.

Sure people don’t like being lied to. You seem to enjoy it like a good little poodle.

Maybe your master will toss you a tennis ball when he gets home if you hadn’t peed on the carpet.

You made a claim, an absurd claim that Trump is not an excessive user of hyperbole.


I've asked you to support that, and you have not even tried to.


Dude. if you ever had any credibility, you just flushed it.



You are LYING.

No fuck face, he’s not an excessive user of hyperbole. He’s an excessive liar.

You just lied. The irony here is bigger than the whole of the planet Earth.
Trump is an excessive user of hyperbole. ONly a liar could claim otherwise.

Ok…where are the tax returns. He said he would release them after the audit. ....

Your position is that he is not an excessive user of hyperbole. Finding one possible lie, does not support that position.


I don't know HOW you would support your position, seeing as how it is utterly absurd, but your attempt so far, is more pathetic than a blind man trying to find a grain of rice he lost in a snow storm.

ok

 

[alang1216]

A wall is permanent.

That is just what Stalin said about his Berlin Wall. What does that wall represent now? Trump''s wall would be a similar stain on the reputation of the US.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

"In a nationally televised address from the White House, the president warned about an "actual humanitarian crisis on the border" prompted by a surge of migrants from Central America, and urged Congress to take action on his immigration agenda.

The year was 2014, and the president was Barack Obama."

 

[hunarcy]

A wall is permanent.

That is just what Stalin said about his Berlin Wall. What does that wall represent now? Trump''s wall would be a similar stain on the reputation of the US.

If there were no way to cross the border and land mines and machine guns guarding the wall, then you'd have a point. Trump's wall is nothing like that. Your hysterical hyperbole is unnecessary and, forgive me for saying it, Trump-like in your exaggeration..

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

A wall is permanent.

That is just what Stalin said about his Berlin Wall. What does that wall represent now? Trump''s wall would be a similar stain on the reputation of the US.

If there were no way to cross the border and land mines and machine guns guarding the wall, then you'd have a point. Trump's wall is nothing like that. Your hysterical hyperbole is unnecessary and, forgive me for saying it, Trump-like in your exaggeration..

You are not forgiven for trolling. If it works in Israel it can work here too.

 

[alang1216]

A wall is permanent.

That is just what Stalin said about his Berlin Wall. What does that wall represent now? Trump''s wall would be a similar stain on the reputation of the US.

If there were no way to cross the border and land mines and machine guns guarding the wall, then you'd have a point. Trump's wall is nothing like that. Your hysterical hyperbole is unnecessary and, forgive me for saying it, Trump-like in your exaggeration..

History will judge us. The point is that walls are NOT permanent.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

A wall is permanent.

That is just what Stalin said about his Berlin Wall. What does that wall represent now? Trump''s wall would be a similar stain on the reputation of the US.

If there were no way to cross the border and land mines and machine guns guarding the wall, then you'd have a point. Trump's wall is nothing like that. Your hysterical hyperbole is unnecessary and, forgive me for saying it, Trump-like in your exaggeration..

History will judge us. The point is that walls are NOT permanent.

More permanent than drones

 

[there4eyeM]

Drones are flexible and can be used as long and as often as necessary. They are not constant stain on the landscape and our nation's image. They are multi-function and could even deliver help if needed.
They would also be much cheaper.

 

[WheelieAddict]

Also lasers

 

[there4eyeM]

Also lasers

Or "losers", those who would build a wall.

 

[WheelieAddict]

Also lasers

Or "losers", those who would build a wall.

A laser wall. You trip the laser a huge alarm goes off. WOOOOOOMP, WOOOOOMp. Border patrol then knows right where to go.

 

[there4eyeM]

Also lasers

Or "losers", those who would build a wall.

A laser wall. You trip the laser a huge alarm goes off. WOOOOOOMP, WOOOOOMp. Border patrol then knows right where to go.

That would certainly be better than a fixed, implanted structure over countless kilometers.

 

[hunarcy]

A wall is permanent.

That is just what Stalin said about his Berlin Wall. What does that wall represent now? Trump''s wall would be a similar stain on the reputation of the US.

If there were no way to cross the border and land mines and machine guns guarding the wall, then you'd have a point. Trump's wall is nothing like that. Your hysterical hyperbole is unnecessary and, forgive me for saying it, Trump-like in your exaggeration..

History will judge us. The point is that walls are NOT permanent.

History will judge us either way. Well we be remembered as a short sighted people who failed to control out border and disappeared as a nation, or one that controlled our border and provided safety and security to ourselves and our descendants?

 

[alang1216]

History will judge us either way. Well we be remembered as a short sighted people who failed to control out border and disappeared as a nation, or one that controlled our border and provided safety and security to ourselves and our descendants?

When our poor neighbors to the south were suffering did we spend billions to help them out or did we spend billions to wall them out?
I agree that history will judge us.

 

[hunarcy]

History will judge us either way. Well we be remembered as a short sighted people who failed to control out border and disappeared as a nation, or one that controlled our border and provided safety and security to ourselves and our descendants?

When our poor neighbors to the south were suffering did we spend billions to help them out or did we spend billions to wall them out?
I agree that history will judge us.

Why do we have an obligation to spend billions on them? Do their nations have no wealth or natural resources to avert such suffering? Mexico, for example, has just as much natural resource per captia as the United States, but their distribution of wealth is radically different than ours. Let history judge that.

List of Latin American and Caribbean countries by GDP (PPP) - Wikipedia

 

[alang1216]

History will judge us either way. Well we be remembered as a short sighted people who failed to control out border and disappeared as a nation, or one that controlled our border and provided safety and security to ourselves and our descendants?

When our poor neighbors to the south were suffering did we spend billions to help them out or did we spend billions to wall them out?
I agree that history will judge us.

Why do we have an obligation to spend billions on them? Do their nations have no wealth or natural resources to avert such suffering? Mexico, for example, has just as much natural resource per captia as the United States, but their distribution of wealth is radically different than ours. Let history judge that.

List of Latin American and Caribbean countries by GDP (PPP) - Wikipedia

How many Latin American politicians did we support or outright put into power? You break it, you bought it.

United States involvement in regime change in Latin America

 

[alang1216]

History will judge us either way. Well we be remembered as a short sighted people who failed to control out border and disappeared as a nation, or one that controlled our border and provided safety and security to ourselves and our descendants?

When our poor neighbors to the south were suffering did we spend billions to help them out or did we spend billions to wall them out?
I agree that history will judge us.

Why do we have an obligation to spend billions on them? Do their nations have no wealth or natural resources to avert such suffering? Mexico, for example, has just as much natural resource per captia as the United States, but their distribution of wealth is radically different than ours. Let history judge that.

List of Latin American and Caribbean countries by GDP (PPP) - Wikipedia

1954: Guatemala[edit]

In a CIA operation code named Operation PBSUCCESS, the U.S. government executed a coup that was successful in overthrowing the democratically-elected government of President Jacobo Árbenz and installed Carlos Castillo Armas, the first of a line of brutal right-wing dictators, in its place.[63][64][65] The perceived success of the operation made it a model for future CIA operations because the CIA lied to the president of the United States when briefing him regarding the number of casualties.

1912–1933: Nicaragua[edit]

The U.S. government invaded Nicaragua in 1912 after intermittent US military landings and naval bombardments in the previous decades. The U.S. was providing political support to conservative-led forces who were rebelling against President José Santos Zelaya, a liberal. U.S. motives included disagreement with the proposed Nicaragua Canal, since the U.S. controlled the Panama Canal Zone, which included the Panama Canal, and President Zelaya's attempts to regulate access by foreigners to Nicaraguan natural resources. On November 17, 1909, two Americans were executed by order of Zelaya after the two men confessed to having laid a mine in the San Juan River with the intention of blowing up the Diamante. The U.S. justified the intervention by claiming to protect American lives and property. Zelaya resigned later that year. The U.S. occupied the country almost continuously from 1912 through 1933.

1900s–1920s: Honduras[edit]

In what became known as the "Banana Wars," between the end of the Spanish–American War in 1898 and the inception of the Good Neighbor Policy in 1934, the U.S. staged many military invasions and interventions in Central America and the Caribbean.[18] The United States Marine Corps, which most often fought these wars, developed a manual called The Strategy and Tactics of Small Wars in 1921 based on its experiences. On occasion, the Navy provided gunfire support and Army troops were also used. The United Fruit Company and Standard Fruit Company dominated Honduras' key banana export sector and associated land holdings and railways. The U.S. staged invasions and incursions of US troops in 1903 (supporting a coup by Manuel Bonilla), 1907 (supporting Bonilla against a Nicaraguan-backed coup), 1911 and 1912 (defending the regime of Miguel R. Davila from an uprising), 1919 (peacekeeping during a civil war, and installing the caretaker government of Francisco Bográn), 1920 (defending the Bográn regime from a general strike), 1924 (defending the regime of Rafael López Gutiérrez from an uprising) and 1925 (defending the elected government of Miguel Paz Barahona) to defend US interests.[19] Writer O. Henry coined the term "Banana republic" in 1904 to describe Honduras.

 

[hunarcy]

History will judge us either way. Well we be remembered as a short sighted people who failed to control out border and disappeared as a nation, or one that controlled our border and provided safety and security to ourselves and our descendants?

When our poor neighbors to the south were suffering did we spend billions to help them out or did we spend billions to wall them out?
I agree that history will judge us.

Why do we have an obligation to spend billions on them? Do their nations have no wealth or natural resources to avert such suffering? Mexico, for example, has just as much natural resource per captia as the United States, but their distribution of wealth is radically different than ours. Let history judge that.

List of Latin American and Caribbean countries by GDP (PPP) - Wikipedia

How many Latin American politicians did we support or outright put into power? You break it, you bought it.

United States involvement in regime change in Latin America

Stupid response. Sorry you had no answer.