Mustang
Gold Member
You sound like the kid in class who, like everyone else, was assigned to read a book on nature and conservation written by the American author, Thoreau. But instead, you read a book on economics and class division by the German, Karl Marx. Then the next week you came to class and criticized everyone else for not knowing the meaning of the assigned reading material.
Well, okay then.
So, you contend that the "Green" movement is NOT an adjunct of the radical left? Shall we test your thesis? Because I contend that there is no distinction at all between the extreme left and the Greens. That the "Green" movement has one goal, the establishment of authoritarian leftism.
The difference is, I can support my position.
Conservatism as a philosophy used to include the concept of conserving the environment as Teddy Roosevelt's embrace of national parks and monuments makes clear. Nixon's EPA was and is an extension of that philosophy.
Unfortunately, today's conservatives seem to have some strange need to eschew or reject any idea if it's embraced by liberals in any way. Whether it's nature conservancy or the individual mandate, it seems to be the same story over and over again.
Frankly, it's kinda twisted. It reminds me of the kind of reaction a spurned lover might have to former interests like certain food or music he or she previously loved just because certain restaurants or musical bands remind them of a previous life. It makes a mockery of the concept of core beliefs if one has to check to see what the opposition believes in order to know what they themselves believe.