Either the economy has recovered or it hasn't. Which is it libs?

Remodeling Maidiac

Diamond Member
Jun 13, 2011
101,230
46,221
2,315
Kansas City
You have been asserting for MONTHS that Obama saved the economy yet you're whining about unemployment benefits not being extended. Why would they need to be extended if the economy has recovered? You can't have it both ways.

By the way, if you can't find a job in a year or two my guess is it's more your fault than anything else. Why should my taxes go to you because your pride is in the way of you getting a job?
 
Recovery and Recovered don't mean the same thing unless you arent factoring in what words actually mean
 
because your fucking heros the CEO are trimming cost by not allowing people to have full time work
 
Less people working than 4 years ago... After the "recovery" got us out of the recession. Obama is worse than Bush on the economy, hard to believe I know.
 
It's been recovering slowly for 4 years- too bad Pubs have blocked all jobs bills and have concocted phony debt crises and threatened shutdowns that cost at least 0.6 per cent growth each time. Now the country has caught on and they won't again, so the recovery can complete...

Employers only hire people who've been out of work a short time, and anyway UE benefits have NEVER been cut off with UE so high. But nothing's beyond the bs ideology new GOP...
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
It's been recovering slowly for 4 years- too bad Pubs have blocked all jobs bills and have concocted phony debt crises and threatened shutdowns that cost at least 0.6 per cent growth each time. Now the country has caught on and they won't again, so the recovery can complete...

Employers only hire people who've been out of work a short time, and anyway UE benefits have NEVER been cut off with UE so high. But nothing's beyond the bs ideology new GOP...

Unemployment benefits were ment to be a stop gap not a fucking lifestyle.
 
You have been asserting for MONTHS that Obama saved the economy yet you're whining about unemployment benefits not being extended. Why would they need to be extended if the economy has recovered? You can't have it both ways.

By the way, if you can't find a job in a year or two my guess is it's more your fault than anything else. Why should my taxes go to you because your pride is in the way of you getting a job?

Is this a serious question?
 
You have been asserting for MONTHS that Obama saved the economy yet you're whining about unemployment benefits not being extended. Why would they need to be extended if the economy has recovered? You can't have it both ways.

By the way, if you can't find a job in a year or two my guess is it's more your fault than anything else. Why should my taxes go to you because your pride is in the way of you getting a job?

Is this a serious question?

Yes but sadly you're clearly under qualified to respond in kind.
 
Recovery and Recovered don't mean the same thing unless you arent factoring in what words actually mean

Obama SAVED the economy.

Those are liberal words not mine. So again I ask, if it is saved why do we have to keep giving out handouts.


So if there are any people still unemployed then the recovery couldn't have happened? Is that what you're implying?
 
because your fucking heros the CEO are trimming cost by not allowing people to have full time work

Yes, it's called business. Reduce expenses when possible, strive for efficiency and avoid spending wastefully. You do the exact same thing.
 
You have been asserting for MONTHS that Obama saved the economy yet you're whining about unemployment benefits not being extended. Why would they need to be extended if the economy has recovered? You can't have it both ways.

By the way, if you can't find a job in a year or two my guess is it's more your fault than anything else. Why should my taxes go to you because your pride is in the way of you getting a job?

Some still call it the jobless recovery. And the definition of recovery has been changed to mean that we are a giant step closer to socialism. It's coming and some couldn't be happier.

They want to extend unemployment because they know even more jobs are being killed by Obamacare and they don't want angry mobs showing up at the polls. That is why they blame it all on Republicans. The solution is to repeal Obamacare and let companies recover and hire again. The left prefers handouts to keep people going. Besides, the longer people are off work, the harder it is to get hired. It means that more welfare recipients are being created and that always bodes well for liberals. It's a slow transition to nanny government.

All we will hear the next year is how mean old Republicans wouldn't extend unemployment yet another 99 weeks. Where the money would even come from, who knows?
 
You have been asserting for MONTHS that Obama saved the economy yet you're whining about unemployment benefits not being extended. Why would they need to be extended if the economy has recovered? You can't have it both ways.

By the way, if you can't find a job in a year or two my guess is it's more your fault than anything else. Why should my taxes go to you because your pride is in the way of you getting a job?

Is this a serious question?

Yes but sadly you're clearly under qualified to respond in kind.

You're a convicted felon and now mix concrete for a living. Let's step off that high horse.
 
Recovery and Recovered don't mean the same thing unless you arent factoring in what words actually mean

Obama SAVED the economy.

Those are liberal words not mine. So again I ask, if it is saved why do we have to keep giving out handouts.

Those are your words and you asked about the recovery.

We are in a recovery...Recovered is the past tense and no one that isnt made of straw said we are recovered
 
TARP AND the stimulus saved the economy, which the Bushies wrecked. Got it yet duh...

TARP was Bushes. And it was as stupid as the stimulus money that wasted billions with nothing to show for it except some campaign donors being paid back.
 
You have been asserting for MONTHS that Obama saved the economy yet you're whining about unemployment benefits not being extended. Why would they need to be extended if the economy has recovered? You can't have it both ways.

By the way, if you can't find a job in a year or two my guess is it's more your fault than anything else. Why should my taxes go to you because your pride is in the way of you getting a job?

Some still call it the jobless recovery. And the definition of recovery has been changed to mean that we are a giant step closer to socialism. It's coming and some couldn't be happier.

They want to extend unemployment because they know even more jobs are being killed by Obamacare and they don't want angry mobs showing up at the polls. That is why they blame it all on Republicans. The solution is to repeal Obamacare and let companies recover and hire again. The left prefers handouts to keep people going. Besides, the longer people are off work, the harder it is to get hired. It means that more welfare recipients are being created and that always bodes well for liberals. It's a slow transition to nanny government.

All we will hear the next year is how mean old Republicans wouldn't extend unemployment yet another 99 weeks. Where the money would even come from, who knows?

Excellent assessment!
 
Recovery and Recovered don't mean the same thing unless you arent factoring in what words actually mean

Obama SAVED the economy.

Those are liberal words not mine. So again I ask, if it is saved why do we have to keep giving out handouts.

Those are your words and you asked about the recovery.

We are in a recovery...Recovered is the past tense and no one that isnt made of straw said we are recovered

Stick your head back in the sand.

We are NOT recovering. We ARE limping along at a terrible pace. We ARE creating more recipients of assistance than we are jobs. The ONLY thing that has recovered is Wallstreet.
 
because your fucking heros the CEO are trimming cost by not allowing people to have full time work

Yes, it's called business. Reduce expenses when possible, strive for efficiency and avoid spending wastefully. You do the exact same thing.


Yes, it's business and wealth creation, something the government needs to survive and something the government is incapable of achieving. Most Dem presidents have been lawyers and they only understand using, and twisting, laws to transfer money from deep pockets to their clients. It explains why most Dems have used liberal judges to overturn local elections and constantly go after the middle class to transfer money to their 'clients', which are their voters. They never actually go after the wealthy because they depend on them to get elected. They falsely claim to want to tax them more, but in reality, it's the middle class who gets raped.

They understand nothing about the private sector and only see it as a giant pile of money that they will get their hands on somehow. While the majority of wealthy senators are Democrats, they have a problem with other people being wealthy. Their specialty is preventing middle class people from becoming wealthy. Obamacare proves that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top