Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[BS Filter]

Nope, they're not.

Yes. You're a very sick ignorant fraud.

 

[scruffy]

Merry Christmas Rigby5

It is a Civil Court case, not a criminal charge. The 14th does not require a criminal charge....as it is written?

I am not saying they are correct in their decision, just that without more instruction or direction of the amendment...no one knows what is proper...

Only LIBTARDS don't understand what's proper.

The rest of us understand that you need a criminal conviction for a criminal offense.

Insurrection is a criminal charge, therefore according to our Constitution as written it requires a trial by jury.

How can you not know this and claim to be American, if you don't even know the rules?

 

[BS Filter]

Only LIBTARDS don't understand what's proper.

The rest of us understand that you need a criminal conviction for a criminal offense.

Insurrection is a criminal charge, therefore according to our Constitution as written it requires a trial by jury.

How can you not know this and claim to be American, if you don't even know the rules?

These are ignorant creatures we're talking with. Commies in training.

 

[Delldude]

That he participated in an insurrection.

Prove it in a court of law.

 

[Delldude]

Not all trials have a jury. Too bad, sucks to be you.

Then where was the evidence introduced to the court that Trump had committed, indicted and found guilty of insurrection?

I think it's referred to as due process.

 

[scruffy]

Prove it in a court of law.

Courts seem to be of marginal utility in this effort.

For instance Rudy Giuliani was convicted for lying about the 17,000 bogus votes in Georgia, now we find out he was right and there really WERE 17,000 bogus votes.

 

[jc456]

Why do you think it will go down?

Ask the three other judges

 

[jc456]

Courts seem to be of marginal utility in this effort.

For instance Rudy Giuliani was convicted for lying about the 17,000 bogus votes in Georgia, now we find out he was right and there really WERE 17,000 bogus votes.

147,000 to be exact

 

[Nostra]

Poor, loser.

You think that drivel negates the fact you lied, liar?

 

[jbander]

Diaper Don': Internet celebrates 'Trump smells' trending on social media MSN This information is coming from Trump Insiders.​

 

[bripat9643]

Nope. That's what history says, fucking moron.

Wrong.

 

[Care4all]

Prove it in a court of law.

Merry Christmas!
The problem is that the constitution does not say that...

It specifically states ENGAGED instead of CONVICTED.

The 14th sec 3, is not a criminal punishment, it is a Civil punishment.

 

[jc456]

You think that drivel negates the fact you lied, liar?

Sure he does, liars have no integrity

 

[jc456]

t specifically states ENGAGED instead of CONVICTED

Disinformation

 

[IM2]

Disinformation

Fact.

 

[Delldude]

Courts seem to be of marginal utility in this effort.

For instance Rudy Giuliani was convicted for lying about the 17,000 bogus votes in Georgia, now we find out he was right and there really WERE 17,000 bogus votes.

Just like a banana, there is a peel.

 

[Delldude]

The problem is that the constitution does not say that...

Oh boy oh boy.....you can say that again.

Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3:

"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof But Congress may by a vote of two-thirdsremovesucdisability.
_______________________
Could the disqualification clause prevent Donald Trump from running for president in 2024?

Theoretically, yes. Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment gives Congress the power to disqualify someone who has already held a public office from holding "any office" if they participate in an "insurrection or rebellion" against the United States.

But since this mechanism has never been used against a president, there are still questions to resolve. The disqualification clause applies to current and former federal officials, state officials, and military officials. However, legal scholars are split on whether the disqualification clause applies to the presidency. It's likely the 14th Amendment will continue to come up in conversations approaching the 2024 presidential election.

https://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment14/annotation15.html

A good indicator of how this will go is, if you've noticed, the rabid MSM was foaming at the mouth over this after the decision............suddenly, not much speculation.....their legal people most likely told them it'll die at SCOTUS.

Trump wasn't charged in your civil trial either, so His due process rights have been constitutionally violated.

It specifically states ENGAGED instead of CONVICTED.

Yet no one, other than hearsay has, proven he was 'engaged'.

Merry Christmas..........

 

[jc456]

147,000 to be exact

Care4all , fake news? In your face.

This the case I bring up when people ask for evidence of fraud. Seems like the defense attorneys do not want to lose. A real case with real consequences.

Fulton County Defense Attorneys Move to Withdraw Amid Questions About 2020 Ballots

There's trouble in Fulton County, Georgia as two high-powered criminal defense attorneys have suddenly filed a motion to withdraw from a 2020 election case. Criminal Defense Attorneys Donald F. Samuel and Amanda R. Clark Palmer have motioned to withdraw themselves from the Favorito v. Wan case...

beckernews.com

 

[jbander]

Oh boy oh boy.....you can say that again.

Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3:

"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof But Congress may by a vote of two-thirdsremovesucdisability.
_______________________
Could the disqualification clause prevent Donald Trump from running for president in 2024?

Theoretically, yes. Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment gives Congress the power to disqualify someone who has already held a public office from holding "any office" if they participate in an "insurrection or rebellion" against the United States.

But since this mechanism has never been used against a president, there are still questions to resolve. The disqualification clause applies to current and former federal officials, state officials, and military officials. However, legal scholars are split on whether the disqualification clause applies to the presidency. It's likely the 14th Amendment will continue to come up in conversations approaching the 2024 presidential election.

https://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment14/annotation15.html

A good indicator of how this will go is, if you've noticed, the rabid MSM was foaming at the mouth over this after the decision............suddenly, not much speculation.....their legal people most likely told them it'll die at SCOTUS.

Trump wasn't charged in your civil trial either, so His due process rights have been constitutionally violated.


Yet no one, other than hearsay has, proven he was 'engaged'.

Merry Christmas......

Diaper Don should be on trial for treason and if found guilty should be put to death. Hey people have you heard how badly Diaper Don smells , it was said that he is like walking past a state fair satellite a the end of the day.

 

[Curried Goats]

Only LIBTARDS don't understand what's proper.

The rest of us understand that you need a criminal conviction for a criminal offense.

Everyone understands that. Let us know when you Bingos catch on to the fact that this wasn't a criminal court and the judgement doesn't impose any criminal penalties.

Insurrection is a criminal charge, therefore according to our Constitution as written it requires a trial by jury.

When you want to convict someone of insurrection, yes. Is that what this Court did?

How can you not know this and claim to be American, if you don't even know the rules?

How can we have rational conversations with people like you who can't acknowledge reality?