Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[Faun]

Still can’t quote me saying what you claimed, huh liar?

Poor, loser.

 

[Faun]

That is the point.
Since it was not a criminal case that has the burden of proof of a criminal case, then NO criminal penalty can be imposed.
Trump can ONLY have a criminal penalty for "insurrection" with a criminal trial that has a criminal standard of proof.

And Trump is not facing a criminal penalty.

 

[Delldude]

I said he had a trial to determine his eligibility. He had the opportunity in a courtroom to defend himself from the claimant. He lost. Too fucking bad for him.

What was to court finding that determined He wasn't eligible?

 

[Faun]

What was to court finding that determined He wasn't eligible?

That he participated in an insurrection.

 

[BS Filter]

That he participated in an insurrection.

That's not a trial. You're a lying two-faced jackal.

 

[BS Filter]

I never said he had a trial for insurrection, you raving idiot.

I said he had a trial to determine his eligibility. He had the opportunity in a courtroom to defend himself from the claimant. He lost. Too fucking bad for him.

That wasn't a trial. You're stupid.

 

[BS Filter]

That he participated in an insurrection.

Where was the jury? Dick nose.

 

[bripat9643]

Not in a court of law. But his actions fit the definition of providing aid or comfort to one.

That's nothing but your worthless opinion. That's why we have courts and juries.

 

[Faun]

That's not a trial. You're a lying two-faced jackal.

His civil case was a trial, cretin.

 

[Faun]

That wasn't a trial. You're stupid.

You're beyond brain-dead. Yes, this was a trial...

Trump 14th Amendment trial in Colorado opens with focus on events of Jan. 6 • Colorado Newsline

“This was an insurrection that Trump led,” said Eric Olson, an attorney for the plaintiffs and a former Colorado solicitor general.

coloradonewsline.com

A weeklong trial in a challenge to former President Donald Trump’s constitutional eligibility to seek office again began in a Denver courtroom on Monday with a focus on the events of Jan. 6, 2021, when a pro-Trump mob stormed the U.S. Capitol and interrupted the certification of election results.​

 

[Faun]

That's nothing but your worthless opinion. That's why we have courts and juries.

LOL

Fucking moron, it's not my opinion Trump trial took place in a courtroom.

 

[bripat9643]

LOL

Fucking moron, it's not my opinion Trump trial took place in a courtroom.

Where was the trial that ruled anyone committed insurrection?

 

[BS Filter]

You're beyond brain-dead. Yes, this was a trial...

Trump 14th Amendment trial in Colorado opens with focus on events of Jan. 6 • Colorado Newsline

“This was an insurrection that Trump led,” said Eric Olson, an attorney for the plaintiffs and a former Colorado solicitor general.

coloradonewsline.com

​

A weeklong trial in a challenge to former President Donald Trump’s constitutional eligibility to seek office again began in a Denver courtroom on Monday with a focus on the events of Jan. 6, 2021, when a pro-Trump mob stormed the U.S. Capitol and interrupted the certification of election results.​

Where was the jury?

 

[Faun]

Where was the trial that ruled anyone committed insurrection?

Not needed.

 

[Faun]

Where was the jury?

Not all trials have a jury. Too bad, sucks to be you.

 

[bripat9643]

Not needed.

ROFL! That's what quacks always say.

 

[BS Filter]

Not all trials have a jury. Too bad, sucks to be you.

Yeah, they're called "communist tribunals".

 

[Faun]

ROFL! That's what quacks always say.

Nope. That's what history says, fucking moron.

 

[Faun]

Yeah, they're called "communist tribunals".

Nope, they're not.

 

[Care4all]

The system is not working and has not worked well since about 1880.
Sure one can appeal, but that not only costs millions, but can take over a year.
What is supposed to happen is that all other judges are supposed to be reviewing the actions of any ruling like this, and it is the other judges who are supposed to catch and punish judicial misconduct like this.
This is not even close to being legal, and no one should be allowing this.
It totally degrades the confidence every one has in the entire system, and makes armed rebellion seem like the only remaining course of action.

Actually we likely should have had an armed rebellion over the Spanish American war, WWI, Prohibition, Vietnam, the War on Drugs, etc.
The whole country has not been close to being legal for over a century.

Merry Christmas Rigby5

It is a Civil Court case, not a criminal charge. The 14th does not require a criminal charge....as it is written?

I am not saying they are correct in their decision, just that without more instruction or direction of the amendment...no one knows what is proper...