The attempt to Usurp the supreme Court will fail.

[Marener]

1. There was no insurrection. Verifying election results is perfectly legal.

Insurrection-Lite: The Supreme Court Downsizes the “Insurrection” to Largely Trespassing

Below is my column in the Hill on the Supreme Court decision on Friday in Fischer v. U.S. to reject hundreds of charges in January 6th cases for the obstruction of legal proceedings. For many cases…

jonathanturley.org

2. Nothing to do with immunity. Trump and the USSC just reduced the "expansive powers" of Federal agencies.

3. Yes we're sure the (34) felonies will be overturned on appeal. So why isn't it happening? Lawfare?

Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal

Below is my column in the Hill on the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan. There has been considerable criticism of the defense te…

jonathanturley.org

4. Biden just said "Mike Johnson is DOA". Is that a threat on Mike's life? Does that mean that Navy Seals should shoot Mike? Trump doesn't have cronies like a mob boss. Most need senate approval to work in an administration dumbass.

1. Trump’s efforts went so far beyond what you described, which clearly has nothing to do with the president, since they don’t do anything with counting votes. You’re forgetting how he wanted the DoJ to publish a statement lying about fraud. You’re forgetting how he tried to get state legislators to change the electors. You’re forgetting how he wanted Pence to not count votes.

2. No, they didn’t just reduce executive power. This is the same SCOTUS that said it was fine for Trump to block entire nationalities from entering the country and build a wall with billions of dollars that Congress never approved. The president had authority over the DoJ, that alone should be enough to scare the crap out of you over this decision.

3. Trump will get his appeals. Just be patient. If the courts will protect Trump from malicious prosecution, why do we need immunity again?

4. Trump has cronies. Fewer last time than he’s bound to have next time. For example when he replaced Pence with Vance who admitted he would have taken Trump’s orders on the vote counting in 2020.

 

[lantern2814]

That used to be normal for all SCOTUS Justices. Not long ago.

Not Thomas. He has been a worthless shill since day 1.

Your racism is obvious. As is your jealousy of an educated black man who beat your attempted lynching.

 

[lantern2814]

Haha, you didn't know any of that, did you? Good stuff.

Go read up.

No moron. As soon as the PEOPLE said NO, Republicans backed off. You assholes rammed it through illegally on a party line vote and gave the public a middle finger. Thankfully Trump removed all the teeth and killed the illegal punishments. Remember, only your fellow cultists believe your drivel.

 

[kyzr]

I fail to see how term limits or a binding code of conduct would allow either party to control the Supreme Court.

Who tracks the code of conduct?
Democrats would misuse conduct like they misuse Lawfare.
The USSC is fine as-is.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Buffoonery

Whining

 

[tahuyaman]

Whining

You offer nothing but buffoonery in every thread. Your schtick is boring. B

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Who tracks the code of conduct?

Why does that matter? Either the conduct is against the rules, or it is not.

And it's our media that would monitor the co duct. And whisteleblowers. The criminals aren't going to self report, the way Trump does on TV and Twitter

 

[kyzr]

1. Trump’s efforts went so far beyond what you described, which clearly has nothing to do with the president, since they don’t do anything with counting votes. You’re forgetting how he wanted the DoJ to publish a statement lying about fraud. You’re forgetting how he tried to get state legislators to change the electors. You’re forgetting how he wanted Pence to not count votes.

2. No, they didn’t just reduce executive power. This is the same SCOTUS that said it was fine for Trump to block entire nationalities from entering the country and build a wall with billions of dollars that Congress never approved. The president had authority over the DoJ, that alone should be enough to scare the crap out of you over this decision.

3. Trump will get his appeals. Just be patient. If the courts will protect Trump from malicious prosecution, why do we need immunity again?

4. Trump has cronies. Fewer last time than he’s bound to have next time. For example when he replaced Pence with Vance who admitted he would have taken Trump’s orders on the vote counting in 2020.

1. Even if you interpret Trump's request for GA to "find" 11,000 votes as illegal, the GA guys told him to fuck off.

2. Trump used his exec power to use approved funds legally for the wall, perfectly legal.
Biden illegally paid off student loans. Should he be prosecuted?

3. We need immunity to keep political opponents from being imprisoned from Lawfare. Like Merchan would have done to Trump.

4. Link to Vance saying he would have not have counted votes. Kamala is more likely to not count EC votes.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You offer nothing but buffoonery in every thread. Your schtick is boring. B

Meet my points or shut your crybaby mouth.

This isn't complicated.

This court will go down as the corrupt roberts court.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Your racism is obvious. As is your jealousy of an educated black man who beat your attempted lynching.

 Racists ^^ like to call everyone else racist. They think that actually works.

 

[kyzr]

Why does that matter? Either the conduct is against the rules, or it is not.

And it's our media that would monitor the conduct. And whisteleblowers. The criminals aren't going to self report, the way Trump does on TV and Twitter

You might trust the biased MSM to investigate conduct, we don't.
The USSC is the 3rd independent branch, period.
Let the whiners whine.

 

[tahuyaman]

Meet my points or shut your crybaby mouth.

This isn't complicated.

This court will go down as the corrupt roberts court.

You never make a point. You are too dumb to do that. You’ve never developed a thought of your own. That’s why you can’t sustain a discussion.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You might trust the biased MSM to investigate conduct, we don't.

That just makes you ignorant.

Meanwhile, thanks to the media, we are starting to see the depths of Thomas's corruption.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You never make a point. You are too dumb to do that. You’ve never developed a thought of your own. That’s why you can’t sustain a discussion.

I made points. You're having an embarrassing baby hissy fit over them right now.

Now take your bait and report troll act walking.

 

[kyzr]

That just makes you ignorant.

Meanwhile, thanks to the media, we are starting to see the depths of Thomas's corruption.

What corruption? The same corruption RBG had?

I remember the MSM crucified the governor of VA, and he was innocent.

Supreme Court tosses conviction of former Virginia governor, clarifies reach of bribery law

The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal profession from Wall Street to Main Street to Pennsylvania Avenue.

www.abajournal.com

 

[Marener]

1. Even if you interpret Trump's request for GA to "find" 11,000 votes as illegal, the GA guys told him to fuck off.

2. Trump used his exec power to use approved funds legally for the wall, perfectly legal.
Biden illegally paid off student loans. Should he be prosecuted?

3. We need immunity to keep political opponents from being imprisoned from Lawfare. Like Merchan would have done to Trump.

4. Link to Vance saying he would have not have counted votes. Kamala is more likely to not count EC votes.

1. Funny. I didn’t even mention his phone call to Raffensperger. You managed to ignore everything I did say.

2. Sounds like you’re saying Trump had a lot of power to use funds to do what he wanted. The mere fact that the president has authority over the entire military, DoJ and foreign policy is sufficient admit his board power. That’s not even getting into his authority over the NSA, CIA, DHS. Hell, he can even control the FCC. Remember when he said he wanted to take away broadcast licenses of people he didn’t like?

3. Again, the case before Merchan is not related to presidential authority and you think it’ll be overturned anyway. He would be unlikely to be imprisoned pending appeal anyway. So this decision doesn’t matter to this case, and even if it did, you think the case wouldn’t be successful at doing the thing you want immunity to prevent.

4. Did Vance say he would have overturned the 2020 election?

Trump has cronies and in a second term of office, he’s only going to accumulate more and more of them.

 

[tahuyaman]

I made points. You're having an embarrassing baby hissy fit over them right now.

Now take your bait and report troll act walking.

You made no compelling points. Like I said, you’re not smart enough.

 

[lantern2814]

 Racists ^^ like to call everyone else racist. They think that actually works.

Hey stupid racist, YOU are the one denigrating Clarence Thomas. A black man. Remember, your pathetic gaslight only works on your fellow cultists. You are a racist. And a pathetic know nothing. Run away like usual now.