If it already wasn't, The Supreme Court Is Now On The Ballot.

[ozro]

I believe this idea dies with Joe's candidacy

 

[Couchpotato]

pknopp

I asked a series of questions you muppet. How can you disagree with questions?

 

[pknopp]

Who’s ethics? Who decides what they are when they are violated and what happens if they do? Can you show me where in the Constitution it gives the Legislature the authority to regulate the SCOTUS in this manner?

There are already regulations. Such as reporting outside income.

Funny that the Supreme Court ruled that a president is above the law despite that not being in the Constitution.

But that was all cool, right?

 

[Billiejeens]

There are already regulations. Such as reporting outside income.

Funny that the Supreme Court ruled that a president is above the law despite that not being in the Constitution.

But that was all cool, right?

You didn't understand that ruling
At all.

 

[Couchpotato]

You didn't understand that ruling
At all.

That’s par for the course

 

[Couchpotato]

There are already regulations. Such as reporting outside income.

Funny that the Supreme Court ruled that a president is above the law despite that not being in the Constitution.

But that was all cool, right?

1. That’s not what they ruled.

2. Even if they did that would have nothing to do with the subject of this thread.

 

[Muhammed]

I'm not sure why anyone would be against an ethics code. It's pretty sad that there isn't one already.

They already have an ethics code.

Quid Pro Pedo Joe has no room to talk about ethics.

You know that Prosecutor General that raided the home of my family's $1 million/year ultra-corrupt benefactor! I want him fired and replaced with a corrupt puppet with no law degree or I'm going to cut off that $1 billion U.S. Treasury loan guarantee.

"But our constitution says the prosecutor general needs to have a law degree and experience as an attorney, so we cannot install your puppet into the PGO".

Then change the fucking constitution! I want more money!

It doesn't get more corrupt than that.

 

[pknopp]

1. That’s not what they ruled.

2. Even if they did that would have nothing to do with the subject of this thread.

It would have something to do with addressing what someone replied to me with in this thread.

 

[pknopp]

They already have an ethics code.

Quid Pro Pedo Joe has no room to talk about ethics.

I'm stating what I believe should be done.

 

[Couchpotato]

It would have something to do with addressing what someone replied to me with in this thread.

How? Even if the SCOTUS made an unconstitutional ruling in one case it wouldn’t justify doing it in another.

 

[Lesh]

They met for them to set their own standards as an equal co branch of govt

Or no standards at all?

 

[struth]

Or no standards at all?

Sure whatever they want. The power of the judiciary branch vest in the Supreme Court

 

[pknopp]

How? Even if the SCOTUS made an unconstitutional ruling in one case it wouldn’t justify doing it in another.

It would note the hypocrisy.

 

[Muhammed]

I'm stating what I believe should be done.

You claimed that there wasn't an ethics code and I pointed out the FACT that you are wrong.

 

[pknopp]

You claimed that there wasn't an ethics code and I pointed out the FACT that you are wrong.

If there was there would be no need to adopt one.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/23/roberts-supreme-court-justices-ethics-00098509

 

[Couchpotato]

It would note the hypocrisy.

I don’t think that word means what you think it means.

 

[Muhammed]

If there was there would be no need to adopt one.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/23/roberts-supreme-court-justices-ethics-00098509

They already adopted one in November 2023.

Quid Pro Pedo Joe is suffering from dementia. He doesn't remember a lot of important things. It was less than a year ago and he doesn't remember.

 

[Billiejeens]

I don’t think that word means what you think it means.

Most words dont.

 

[BackAgain]

If it already wasn't, The Supreme Court Is Now On The Ballot.​

Just checking into some of the more absurd threads I’ve seen of late. This one is a good example of out libtards melting down.

No.

The SCOTUS absolutely won’t be on the ballot. And Potato’s muttering imbecile notion aside, we aren’t going to impose any of his silly rules on them or put an age limit on their terms.

 

[OKTexas]

Don't bet the farm on it.

AGAIN: US Court of Appeals Blocks All of Biden's Unconstitutional, Authoritarian "Education Loan Relief"

How many times will Democrats be found in contempt of the US Constitution? It’s so bad for Democrats they need to buy votes of young idiots. A federal appeals court on Thursday blocked President Joe Biden's administration from continuing to implement a new student debt relief plan designed to...

www.usmessageboard.com

.