Yes, but it is a wrong view. The Netherlands e.g. simply were (was?) a part of the Holy Roman Empire and left it some time. But the Holy Roman Empire was a loose bound anyway. Many currencies, armies and laws.While Germany is the pre-eminent economic power in Europe and the German language is used in parts of Switzerland, in Austria, and is closely related to Dutch, less so to English and the Scandinavian languages - it is also unfortunately the case that many smaller nations will resent German 'dominance' based entirely on past history. And I mean going all the way back to the 'Holy Roman Empire'!
They can eat our money, so they can speak our language.While I attempt to eschew even linguistic chauvinism, English remains the 'standard' language for airport traffic control, for computers, and is the 'second language' of choice in many places around the world. (Only it's actually 'American').
I didn't mean to suggest that the resentment I mentioned was justified so far as current events in Europe, sorry! I think it's mostly there as an undercurrent, a kind of 'force of habit'..... people are generally slow to really 'get it' that someone else has changed.
Regardless of which language is used, the EU is a good idea for MOST of Europe. I can see your point that Germany is probably the nation which needs the EU *least* and which gives up the most to be part of it.
A look at the different GDP's by nation should explain WHY the EU is so badly needed by the rest of Europe - particularly when compared with the list of GDP's of US individual states.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
List of U.S. states by GDP - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia