Bell Huey
Diamond Member
- Sep 2, 2017
- 4,650
- 7,173
It should be easy for you to refute, 5X.You continue to assert...
You're an idiot.
You can stop now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It should be easy for you to refute, 5X.You continue to assert...
You're an idiot.
You can stop now.
PS.You continue to assert...
You're an idiot.
You can stop now.
That is all you have. Go ahead and refute the points.Oh, wow..
More talking points!
I joined in 1983. We didn’t have that cool shit.
I of course have experience with the M 16 I was a Huey Crew Member and other Acft for 15 years. Most of my experience is with 38s, 45s, M60Ds, and 50 cals on OH58Ds.So did I, and I agree.
M18A1 was what I used for years. But I did get to see and use much of it later on.
Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 designIt should be easy for you to refute, 5X.
No...I have used both my citations and yours.That is all you have. Go ahead and refute the points.
You won’t. Because you can’t.
Where does it say one design.
You need to go back and read what I was responding to. You just made an even bigger ass of yourself.No...I have used both my citations and yours.
The difference being that I understand them.
Where does it say one design.
if you can answer ONE question with a yes or no, correctly, I will deem. You the winner.
If there Is only ONE design all the parts between what your source labels one as a civilian weapon and one a military weapon are interchangeabl, correct?
Yes or no?
Anything else is an admission of defeat.
Right here.Where does it say one design.
if you can answer ONE question with a yes or no, correctly, I will deem. You the winner.
If there Is only ONE design all the parts between what your source labels one as a civilian weapon and one a military weapon are interchangeabl, correct?
Yes or no?
Anything else is an admission of defeat.
You lose. That doesn’t say one design or answer this question:
No...I don't..You need to go back and read what I was responding to. You just made an even bigger ass of yourself.
Which I did not think was humanly possible, Kydex 67.
Just for the record you are the moron who though a Kydex Holster was a gun in pieces.
Yes...it says one design....You lose. That doesn’t say one design or answer this question:
Where does it say one design.
if you can answer ONE question with a yes or no, correctly, I will deem. You the winner.
If there Is only ONE design all the parts between what your source labels one as a civilian weapon and one a military weapon are interchangeabl, correct?
Yes or no?
Anything else is an admission of defeat.
Your link is to the Armilite Rifle 15 which Colt changed to c601 and then the M16.
Yeah, you do Kydex 67. It wasn’t bout my links. It was about someo ne’s meme, dipshit,No...I don't..
Weapons in 22lr ?
There is no mention of the Sporter in your link. Try harder.Yes...it says one design....
Assuming you can read.
Don’t confuse him. This is the guy that thought a “We the People” Kydex holster was a gun, in pieces.Weapons in 22lr ?