Nope. You did not. The answer is either the USC or the Bible. Thanks anyway.
Liberals are such simpletons. That's what cracks me up when you call anyone else black and white.
Yes. I asked a simple question with an either/or answer. That makes me a simpleton. I have no ability to grasp nuance. I care little for grey areas. It is clear from this thread.
You, on the other hand, are all in with the OP in his quest to stop people from being intolerant of his intolerance. You are so complex. I can't stand it.
How about telling me what takes precedent? The United States Constitution or the Bible? Humor my simple mind.
Deion Sanders was a professional baseball and football player at the same time. When he was playing baseball, the baseball rules were "supreme." When he was playing football, the football rules were.
As for a gay in a store, from a Constitutional perspective, there is no basis either that the gay needs to shop at that store or that the store owner needs to sell him M&Ms. The Federal government has no legitimate basis to get involved at all.
From a Christian perspective, I think the Christian store owner should be decent to him and serve him just as a decent human being. Frankly if the gay knows the owner doesn't approve of him, in my view the Christian wasn't very Christian. However, if the gay does know, he should be a decent human being and leave and go somewhere else. And take his money with him.
Either way, government has no involvement. People need to just pull the stick out. And if you don't like someone, go somewhere else. You dont' have to tolerate intolerance by staying there, but you don't deal with it by fighting it out with them either.
Last edited: