Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You said the businessman could refuse service to anyone he chooses, thus, you sided with him in refusing to serve a Jew, because he was a Jew.
That is an act of anti-Semitism. You chose to make it government sanctioned.
If you wish to dispute that, do so with some elaboration beyond repeatedly badgering me with a useless question about whether or not I read your post.
God and goddess, this is like talking to a mental patient! Supporting someone's right to do business (or not) with whomever he chooses IS NOT THE SAME as agreeing with his choices!
Yes it is. Allowing businesses to discriminate against Jews is an endorsement of anti-Semitism;
it's a choice. It's a choice of whether or not you want acts of anti-Semitism to be civil rights in your country.
It would be no different than if you supported Americans publishing child pornography, as an exercise of freedom of the press,
even if you yourself wanted nothing personally to do with child pornography.
Hey lets pretend that the very best cancer doctor in the USA is Jewish (this is not pretending much).
Should it be ok for this Jewish doctor to refuse to help red neck jew haters? And lets pretend that you Carmac, are the red neck with cancer that the doctor won't treat.
That would be perfectly acceptable. Right? I mean, it is only your life on the line.
And don't bother me with the "Hippocratic oath shit. That can be ignored just like the COTUS and our laws.
Your own link proves you wrong.
Who is surprised?
The kicker is that based on how these conservatives want things to be, the Musliim could fire someone for eating pork.
Objectively speaking...Jesus didn't discriminate. He served everyone didn't he? He turned no one away.
Why would Christians choose to discriminate?
He turned Satan away, did he not? He cast out demons in his name, did he not? Even still he was merciful even to the demons who begged him to let them possess a herd of pigs. He let them. Jesus made the discrimination between righteousness and sinfulness did he not? Funny how you have this idyllic view of Jesus, but have no clue what he was actually like. He cast the moneychangers out of the synagogue with a whip, exclaiming "this is my father's house, not a den of thieves!" Should he not be condemned for kicking people out of a place of worship?
No, he did a lot of discriminating. If he was all accepting there would have been no point for him to come to Earth to die on the cross for the sins of mankind, Coyote. Nor would he have performed his miracles, fed the hungry or healed the sick or afflicted. Sorry, he isn't the type of person you're portraying him to be.
Satan wasn't a human.
Jesus refused no one who came to him.
Nowhere did it say anything about him casting out homosexuals.
If Christians are going to discriminate in Jesus' name - why is that discrimination limited to homosexual customers? Why is homosexuality singled out when there is nothing in Jesus' words that does that? I think it's a false discrimination done in his name.
He turned Satan away, did he not? He cast out demons in his name, did he not? Even still he was merciful even to the demons who begged him to let them possess a herd of pigs. He let them. Jesus made the discrimination between righteousness and sinfulness did he not? Funny how you have this idyllic view of Jesus, but have no clue what he was actually like. He cast the moneychangers out of the synagogue with a whip, exclaiming "this is my father's house, not a den of thieves!" Should he not be condemned for kicking people out of a place of worship?
No, he did a lot of discriminating. If he was all accepting there would have been no point for him to come to Earth to die on the cross for the sins of mankind, Coyote. Nor would he have performed his miracles, fed the hungry or healed the sick or afflicted. Sorry, he isn't the type of person you're portraying him to be.
Satan wasn't a human.
Jesus refused no one who came to him.
Nowhere did it say anything about him casting out homosexuals.
If Christians are going to discriminate in Jesus' name - why is that discrimination limited to homosexual customers? Why is homosexuality singled out when there is nothing in Jesus' words that does that? I think it's a false discrimination done in his name.
Jesus did indeed discriminate. He also upheld the sanctity of creation and of marriage.
And He answered and said to them, Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning made them male and female, and said, For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh?"
-Jesus on being questioned by the Pharisees about divorce, Matthew 19:4-5.
Jesus also spoke of the destruction of the Sodomite (who openly celebrated homosexuality) cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. (Luke 17:28-32; Matthew 10:15; 11:24; Mark 6:11.)
Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.
-Jude 1:7-8
He openly cites the first four five books of the Old Testament, which coincidentally condemns homosexuality to be an abomination before God:
"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."
-Leviticus 18:22
For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me; for he wrote about Me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?
-John 5:46-47
God and goddess, this is like talking to a mental patient! Supporting someone's right to do business (or not) with whomever he chooses IS NOT THE SAME as agreeing with his choices!
Yes it is. Allowing businesses to discriminate against Jews is an endorsement of anti-Semitism;
it's a choice. It's a choice of whether or not you want acts of anti-Semitism to be civil rights in your country.
It would be no different than if you supported Americans publishing child pornography, as an exercise of freedom of the press,
even if you yourself wanted nothing personally to do with child pornography.
WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK! Is this sinking through that thick skull yet? Agreeing someone has a right to be a dickhead is not the same as approving of that person being a dickhead! Is that clear enough...dickhead?
OK, now you're just posting stupid shit and hoping nobody notices!
God and goddess, this is like talking to a mental patient! Supporting someone's right to do business (or not) with whomever he chooses IS NOT THE SAME as agreeing with his choices!
Yes it is. Allowing businesses to discriminate against Jews is an endorsement of anti-Semitism;
it's a choice. It's a choice of whether or not you want acts of anti-Semitism to be civil rights in your country.
It would be no different than if you supported Americans publishing child pornography, as an exercise of freedom of the press,
even if you yourself wanted nothing personally to do with child pornography.
WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK! Is this sinking through that thick skull yet? Agreeing someone has a right to be a dickhead is not the same as approving of that person being a dickhead! Is that clear enough...dickhead?
Your own link proves you wrong.
Who is surprised?
The kicker is that based on how these conservatives want things to be, the Musliim could fire someone for eating pork.
And they should have that right.
God and goddess, this is like talking to a mental patient! Supporting someone's right to do business (or not) with whomever he chooses IS NOT THE SAME as agreeing with his choices!
Yes it is. Allowing businesses to discriminate against Jews is an endorsement of anti-Semitism;
it's a choice. It's a choice of whether or not you want acts of anti-Semitism to be civil rights in your country.
It would be no different than if you supported Americans publishing child pornography, as an exercise of freedom of the press,
even if you yourself wanted nothing personally to do with child pornography.
WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK! Is this sinking through that thick skull yet? Agreeing someone has a right to be a dickhead is not the same as approving of that person being a dickhead! Is that clear enough...dickhead?
Sorry but if a gay wants to buy some M&M's from your store you have to sell it to them. And if you, an infidel, go to a store with a muslim manager they have to sell you groceries.
If you don't like it there are several countries in the world experimenting in segregation and discrimination. They are in the middle east and Africa, the most wonderful places in the world
What takes precedent....the US Constitution or the Bible?
Simple question. One or the other.
What takes precedent....the US Constitution or the Bible?
Simple question. One or the other.
There is no answer to that question because you didn't give a context for the question. The government should follow the US Constitution first. The people in their own lives make their own choices.
Yes it is. Allowing businesses to discriminate against Jews is an endorsement of anti-Semitism;
it's a choice. It's a choice of whether or not you want acts of anti-Semitism to be civil rights in your country.
It would be no different than if you supported Americans publishing child pornography, as an exercise of freedom of the press,
even if you yourself wanted nothing personally to do with child pornography.
WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK, WHACK! Is this sinking through that thick skull yet? Agreeing someone has a right to be a dickhead is not the same as approving of that person being a dickhead! Is that clear enough...dickhead?
I'm dead serious, I don't think they understand the distinction.
The idea of "I may not agree with what you say but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" literally does not register. All they care about is stopping someone from saying something they don't like, and that's where it ends. Period.
.
What takes precedent....the US Constitution or the Bible?
Simple question. One or the other.
There is no answer to that question because you didn't give a context for the question. The government should follow the US Constitution first. The people in their own lives make their own choices.
If you don't want to answer, just say so.
The answer is clear to anyone who thinks rationally.
There is no answer to that question because you didn't give a context for the question. The government should follow the US Constitution first. The people in their own lives make their own choices.
If you don't want to answer, just say so.
The answer is clear to anyone who thinks rationally.
Um...I answered it...
If you don't want to answer, just say so.
The answer is clear to anyone who thinks rationally.
Um...I answered it...
Nope. You did not. The answer is either the USC or the Bible. Thanks anyway.
Um...I answered it...
Nope. You did not. The answer is either the USC or the Bible. Thanks anyway.
Liberals are such simpletons. That's what cracks me up when you call anyone else black and white.
