Europeans or whites, losing their own countries

[Oleoh]

- Person writing this is from Norway, I am not a native speaker of English. I apologize for any typos or other mistakes.

Most countries with a European majority are set to lose their own countries in the 21th century. This is caused by a massive influx of non-Whites or non-Europeans into these countries, combined with low fertility rates. I don't care much about former colonies, because they are not native to those lands, but could settle there cause of low population densety, death from Eurasian diseases (80-90% of the former population in the USA and other countries died from diseases which the travelers unknowingly brought with them. From a population of around 8 mill to 1 mill in the whole US) and better technology.

I do care much more about the countries of Europe. They have absolutely no right to take the land of other people, which the original population has inherited from their ancestors who have built it, died for it and suffered to make good places to live in. They found it, made it and died for it.

In for example the UK, the population is set to be majority non-white around 2050, the same with the USA. For no good reason, the people have been forced to accept this genocidal experiment and to be replaced by people who have no affinety for their culture or inheritance.

What do you think about this development, isn't it the very defention of sickening immorality? Is this not a crime against humanity? And why are people who are against this portrayed to be "supremacists"? Or racist? You don't need to hate anyone to not want to lose your property.


Before I end this post, I will make counter arguments to some likely posts.

They have colonized before and deserve this:
Yes, it was surely a crime. The kings and qeens in many Europeans countries did conqer nations. This were not the people, and European nations are not the only ones who have done this. The Turks were one of the longest lasting colonial powers in world history, took white slavs as slaves and other Europeans. How long should this punishment last and to how large should it really be. Because every nation in world history have done this, and the Chinese are even today replacing the Tibetan population with Han-Chinese. Which have been described as a form of genocide.

The colonization with people in America and Oceania were also wrong, but in some ways I can't blame them of going. Both were nearly empty and could house many people, it were room. Disease made it even worse. It were different times and I just don't think this can be used to justify this replacement. Not that I belive in inherited sins either, or that a majority of the population today decends from someone immoral. Not in Europe or anywhere else.

I will also add that not every European country have done this. Norway and Sweden have never had any colonies.

 

[DarkFury]

First off WELCOME! I think Pat Condell has done some great work on Euro immigration. What are your thoughts?

 

[Oleoh]

First off WELCOME! I think Pat Condell has done some great work on Euro immigration. What are your thoughts?

Thank you I like his videoes. Watched very many of them actually and agree with much of what he says. Often kind of funny too.

 

[DarkFury]

First off WELCOME! I think Pat Condell has done some great work on Euro immigration. What are your thoughts?

Thank you I like his videoes. Watched very many of them actually and agree with much of what he says. Often kind of funny too.

He calls it like it is and Americans would do well to listen to him on that subject.

 

[Meathead]

I think there is a huge disconnect with European leaders and the public. The immigration/refugee issue is going to come to a head in the next round of elections.

 

[Unkotare]

Coward thread.

 

[Kondor3]

In all likelihood, the Next Big Wave of immigration to the United States will be White Europeans, escaping Old Europe, and coming to New Europe (the North American continent).

At some point in the future we'll rename the continent Nova Europa.

 

[Meathead]

Coward thread.

Stupid post.

 

[DarkFury]

Coward thread.

A brand new member on their first post. Coward for what retard? Saying what they think? You are nothing but a damn bigot against freedom of speech.

YOU are the NO CONTENT comment coward NOT the OP.

 

[TheOldSchool]

It's not just colonization; don't forget that after WW2 european whites redrew the world map how they saw fit in many "brown" countries and installed oppressive dictators into many of them too. And they've continued to meddle in their economies and politics to this day. So it's coming back to bite them in the ass? Oh well, let's think of it as a "teaching moment."

 

[Moonglow]

You honkies don't have enough kids to sustain your culture cause you ain't humpin' da old lady enough...

 

[Oleoh]

It's not just colonization; don't forget that after WW2 european whites redrew the world map how they saw fit in many "brown" countries and installed oppressive dictators into many of them too. And they've continued to meddle in their economies and politics to this day. So it's coming back to bite them in the ass? Oh well, let's think of it as a "teaching moment."

No, after WWII the colonies were freed, mostly peacefully. In other countries they just withdrew because of revolutions, and would in spite or because they couldn't, make proper goverments. You just use Europe as a scapegoate. No dictator were installed and only America are medeling in the countries. For different reason.

 

[Oleoh]

You honkies don't have enough kids to sustain your culture cause you ain't humpin' da old lady enough...

The sad story is that the women find it so much more interesting to work, than to make children.

I also know of a social reason for this. Women are attracted to men who have equal or better economical status. After they started to do it better in schools and colleges, they also got better jobs. Then they didn't find good enough males to marry, and didn't. The reason males earn more than women, are because they need to do so to attract them and to marry. Women are the prize, because it's a lot of seeds, but few wombs. Therefor men need to be better than women in most other way, to be equaly attractive.

 

[Moonglow]

It's not just colonization; don't forget that after WW2 european whites redrew the world map how they saw fit in many "brown" countries and installed oppressive dictators into many of them too. And they've continued to meddle in their economies and politics to this day. So it's coming back to bite them in the ass? Oh well, let's think of it as a "teaching moment."

No, after WWII the colonies were freed, mostly peacefully. In other countries they just withdrew because of revolutions, and would in spite or because they couldn't, make proper goverments. You just use Europe as a scapegoate. No dictator were installed and only America are medeling in the countries. For different reason.

Not in SE Asia.. the colonies were not freed and neither was North Africa...

 

[Moonglow]

You honkies don't have enough kids to sustain your culture cause you ain't humpin' da old lady enough...

The sad story is that the women find it so much more interesting to work, than to make children.

I also know of a social reason for this. Women are attracted to men who have equal or better economical status, after they started to do it better in schools and colleges, they also got better jobs. Then they didn't find good enough males to marry, and didn't. The reason males earn more than women, are because they need to do so to attract them and to marry. Women are the prize, because it's a lot of seeds, but few wombs. Therefor men need to be better than women in most other way, to be equaly attractive.

Oh horse shit.....

 

[TheOldSchool]

It's not just colonization; don't forget that after WW2 european whites redrew the world map how they saw fit in many "brown" countries and installed oppressive dictators into many of them too. And they've continued to meddle in their economies and politics to this day. So it's coming back to bite them in the ass? Oh well, let's think of it as a "teaching moment."

No, after WWII the colonies were freed, mostly peacefully. In other countries they just withdrew because of revolutions, and would in spite or because they couldn't, make proper goverments. You just use Europe as a scapegoate. No dictator were installed and only America are medeling in the countries. For different reason.

America is not innocent in that. Neither is Europe. All the muslims pouring into europe are refugees fleeing wars incited by people who lived under western backed dictatorships for years. And who lived under decades of western military intrusions and sanctions.

 

[Kondor3]

It's not just colonization; don't forget that after WW2 european whites redrew the world map how they saw fit in many "brown" countries and installed oppressive dictators into many of them too. And they've continued to meddle in their economies and politics to this day. So it's coming back to bite them in the ass? Oh well, let's think of it as a "teaching moment."

No, after WWII the colonies were freed, mostly peacefully. In other countries they just withdrew because of revolutions, and would in spite or because they couldn't, make proper goverments. You just use Europe as a scapegoate. No dictator were installed and only America are medeling in the countries. For different reason.

America is not innocent in that. Neither is Europe. All the muslims pouring into europe are refugees fleeing wars incited by people who lived under western backed dictatorships for years. And who lived under decades of western military intrusions and sanctions.

Europe is getting overrun because it now lacks the balls to say "No" and lacks the muscle to enforce its will.

Nature is in the process of de-selecting them.

And it seems unlikely that the process is reversible.

 

[Anathema]

You honkies don't have enough kids to sustain your culture cause you ain't humpin' da old lady enough...

But we gave mire than sufficient nukes to remove the populations of Africa, South America, Central America and the Middke East multiple times over.

 

[TheOldSchool]

It's not just colonization; don't forget that after WW2 european whites redrew the world map how they saw fit in many "brown" countries and installed oppressive dictators into many of them too. And they've continued to meddle in their economies and politics to this day. So it's coming back to bite them in the ass? Oh well, let's think of it as a "teaching moment."

No, after WWII the colonies were freed, mostly peacefully. In other countries they just withdrew because of revolutions, and would in spite or because they couldn't, make proper goverments. You just use Europe as a scapegoate. No dictator were installed and only America are medeling in the countries. For different reason.

America is not innocent in that. Neither is Europe. All the muslims pouring into europe are refugees fleeing wars incited by people who lived under western backed dictatorships for years. And who lived under decades of western military intrusions and sanctions.

Europe is getting overrun because it now lacks the balls to say "No" and lacks the muscle to enforce its will.

Nature is in the process of de-selecting them.

And it seems unlikely that the process is reversible.

Well half of America hates Europe anyways. Making them more brown or white won't make a difference.

 

[Oleoh]

It's not just colonization; don't forget that after WW2 european whites redrew the world map how they saw fit in many "brown" countries and installed oppressive dictators into many of them too. And they've continued to meddle in their economies and politics to this day. So it's coming back to bite them in the ass? Oh well, let's think of it as a "teaching moment."

No, after WWII the colonies were freed, mostly peacefully. In other countries they just withdrew because of revolutions, and would in spite or because they couldn't, make proper goverments. You just use Europe as a scapegoate. No dictator were installed and only America are medeling in the countries. For different reason.

America is not innocent in that. Neither is Europe. All the muslims pouring into europe are refugees fleeing wars incited by people who lived under western backed dictatorships for years. And who lived under decades of western military intrusions and sanctions.

Europe is getting overrun because it now lacks the balls to say "No" and lacks the muscle to enforce its will.

Nature is in the process of de-selecting them.

And it seems unlikely that the process is reversible.

Actually, there are many anti-immigration parties who are growing. In Norway we already have one in power. In the UK both the Conservatives and UKIP are anti-immigration. In Sweden they have the Sweden Democrats, the largest party in Sweden now. In Denmark they have a party, the third larges I belive. In Italy they have a large one. In France they have the National Front, belived to become the largest in Frane. Germany is a tragic exeption, because some leftists find it proper to remove their own populations because of the nazi genocide. Alternative for Germany is a party who can limmit their immigration, and the Christian Democratic Party are not very pro immigration I belive, but for some reason accepts it.