Even the polling is BIASED!

[Mac1958]

The problem is that "news" doesn't mean what it used to mean. Today, people will go onto a site like HuffPo or Breitbart and, in their minds, think that they're reading a "news" story.

Because the "news article" is written from their political perspective, they swallow it whole like a child eats candy. It doesn't even occur to them that the piece could be slanted in their direction.

"News" is a term that's just impossible to define now, sadly.
.

The problem is outright corruption and the stupidity of Americans.

There's a lot of corruption, there are Americans who don't pay much attention, there are Americans who DO pay attention, and there are Americans who can only see or believe their "side" of any given issue.

That last group is an easy mark for intellectually dishonest advocacy "journalism" like Breitbart and HuffPo.
.

Example of Huffpo lying like Breitbart does nonstop?

HuffPo is clearly slanted. I didn't directly equate them.

I would not be at all surprised if someone like you didn't see it.
.

 

[Mac1958]

There's a lot of corruption, there are Americans who don't pay much attention, there are Americans who DO pay attention, and there are Americans who can only see or believe their "side" of any given issue.

That last group is an easy mark for intellectually dishonest advocacy "journalism" like Breitbart and HuffPo.
.

Sorry but you MISSED the entire point! The MSM i.e. ABC,CBS,et.al. are biased. To believe otherwise is "intellectually dishonest"!
FACTS..
View attachment 142411
View attachment 142412

Yes, I was in it for nearly 20 years, it is.

The fact remains, partisans on both ends eat what's fed them by media that is on their "side".
.

Don't dispute partisanship in the media. My point though is the majority of people that depend on the MSM, ABC,CBS,etc. for their news are being BIASED!
And the balance is not there! Why is it impossible for people like you to admit these FACTS exist?
View attachment 142417
Or this fact:
85% of ABC,CBS, NBC employees DONATED to Democrats!!!!
"When 1,160 (85%) of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

What is the problem in admitting that the MAJORITY of the MSM is:
A) Biased.
B) Biased towards the left/Democrats/progressives.

I don't know what you think I'm saying.

Most of the media is biased to the Left, to different degrees. Then there is right wing media, which is much smaller.

In my experience, I'd say 85% sounds about correct overall.
.

Telling the truth is now being biased to the Left, according to the New BS GOP, its dupes, and the big orange tool...

You guys are just as intellectually dishonest as those you loathe.
.

 

[francoHFW]

The problem is that "news" doesn't mean what it used to mean. Today, people will go onto a site like HuffPo or Breitbart and, in their minds, think that they're reading a "news" story.

Because the "news article" is written from their political perspective, they swallow it whole like a child eats candy. It doesn't even occur to them that the piece could be slanted in their direction.

"News" is a term that's just impossible to define now, sadly.
.

The problem is outright corruption and the stupidity of Americans.

There's a lot of corruption, there are Americans who don't pay much attention, there are Americans who DO pay attention, and there are Americans who can only see or believe their "side" of any given issue.

That last group is an easy mark for intellectually dishonest advocacy "journalism" like Breitbart and HuffPo.
.

Example of Huffpo lying like Breitbart does nonstop?

HuffPo is clearly slanted. I didn't directly equate them.

I would not be at all surprised if someone like you didn't see it.
.

ONE example of their lies, dupe? Meanwhile your whole movement is based on CRAP: The rich pay too much in taxes, the 2008 corrupt bust was Dems' fault lol, lock her up (and Obama, Lerner, Lynch, Holder, Bill), Obama's policies (none passed except ACA) caused ANYTHING, see sig.- None of it gets into the real world or the US justice system, dingbats.

 

[Mac1958]

The problem is that "news" doesn't mean what it used to mean. Today, people will go onto a site like HuffPo or Breitbart and, in their minds, think that they're reading a "news" story.

Because the "news article" is written from their political perspective, they swallow it whole like a child eats candy. It doesn't even occur to them that the piece could be slanted in their direction.

"News" is a term that's just impossible to define now, sadly.
.

The problem is outright corruption and the stupidity of Americans.

There's a lot of corruption, there are Americans who don't pay much attention, there are Americans who DO pay attention, and there are Americans who can only see or believe their "side" of any given issue.

That last group is an easy mark for intellectually dishonest advocacy "journalism" like Breitbart and HuffPo.
.

Example of Huffpo lying like Breitbart does nonstop?

HuffPo is clearly slanted. I didn't directly equate them.

I would not be at all surprised if someone like you didn't see it.
.

ONE example of their lies, dupe? Meanwhile your whole movement is based on CRAP: The rich pay too much in taxes, the 2008 corrupt bust was Dems' fault lol, lock her up (and Obama, Lerner, Lynch, Holder, Bill), Obama's policies (none passed except ACA) caused ANYTHING, see sig.- None of it gets into the real world or the US justice system, dingbats.

You can't think of any dishonesty from the Left. Not one example.

I absolutely believe that. I truly do.
.

 

[francoHFW]

The problem is outright corruption and the stupidity of Americans.

There's a lot of corruption, there are Americans who don't pay much attention, there are Americans who DO pay attention, and there are Americans who can only see or believe their "side" of any given issue.

That last group is an easy mark for intellectually dishonest advocacy "journalism" like Breitbart and HuffPo.
.

Example of Huffpo lying like Breitbart does nonstop?

HuffPo is clearly slanted. I didn't directly equate them.

I would not be at all surprised if someone like you didn't see it.
.

ONE example of their lies, dupe? Meanwhile your whole movement is based on CRAP: The rich pay too much in taxes, the 2008 corrupt bust was Dems' fault lol, lock her up (and Obama, Lerner, Lynch, Holder, Bill), Obama's policies (none passed except ACA) caused ANYTHING, see sig.- None of it gets into the real world or the US justice system, dingbats.

You can't think of any dishonesty from the Left. Not one example.

I absolutely believe that. I truly do.
.

Neither can you- just RW BS, predictions that were ruined by events, and fake news. Meanwhile, I can't think of any GOP facts either. See sig.

 

[Mac1958]

There's a lot of corruption, there are Americans who don't pay much attention, there are Americans who DO pay attention, and there are Americans who can only see or believe their "side" of any given issue.

That last group is an easy mark for intellectually dishonest advocacy "journalism" like Breitbart and HuffPo.
.

Example of Huffpo lying like Breitbart does nonstop?

HuffPo is clearly slanted. I didn't directly equate them.

I would not be at all surprised if someone like you didn't see it.
.

ONE example of their lies, dupe? Meanwhile your whole movement is based on CRAP: The rich pay too much in taxes, the 2008 corrupt bust was Dems' fault lol, lock her up (and Obama, Lerner, Lynch, Holder, Bill), Obama's policies (none passed except ACA) caused ANYTHING, see sig.- None of it gets into the real world or the US justice system, dingbats.

You can't think of any dishonesty from the Left. Not one example.

I absolutely believe that. I truly do.
.

Neither can you- just RW BS, predictions that were ruined by events, and fake news. Meanwhie, I can't think of any GOP facts either. See sig.

As I said, I believe you.

I have a tremendous respect - an awe, actually - for the power of ideology over the human mind, so I believe you.
.

 

[francoHFW]

Example of Huffpo lying like Breitbart does nonstop?

HuffPo is clearly slanted. I didn't directly equate them.

I would not be at all surprised if someone like you didn't see it.
.

ONE example of their lies, dupe? Meanwhile your whole movement is based on CRAP: The rich pay too much in taxes, the 2008 corrupt bust was Dems' fault lol, lock her up (and Obama, Lerner, Lynch, Holder, Bill), Obama's policies (none passed except ACA) caused ANYTHING, see sig.- None of it gets into the real world or the US justice system, dingbats.

You can't think of any dishonesty from the Left. Not one example.

I absolutely believe that. I truly do.
.

Neither can you- just RW BS, predictions that were ruined by events, and fake news. Meanwhie, I can't think of any GOP facts either. See sig.

As I said, I believe you.

I have a tremendous respect - an awe, actually - for the power of ideology over the human mind, so I believe you.
.

ZZZZZZZZZ. Hilariously ironic.Check any respected media outlet in the world, dupe, not your USA only Fox, Rush, Breitbart, Beck, Heritage, all billionaire dupe financed CRAP. It's about facts and truth. The GOP is the only party in the modern world that denies socialism, MMGW, universal health care, progressive tax rates, 4 week+ vacations, paid parental leave, $11+ min wage, cheap college, a good ID card and immigration/work controls, cheap college, good infrastructure etc etc. Great job, greedy a-hole/hypocrite GOP and silly dupes!

 

[Reasonable]

These are the most — and the least — trusted news sources in the U.S.
Published: Aug 6, 2017 10:13 a.m. ET

The results were based on a survey of more than 8,000 people conducted by 28 media organizations in the U.S. Participation was voluntary but respondents tended to reside near the news outlets that made the questionnaire available on their websites, and leaned toward the liberal side of the political spectrum.
These are the most — and the least — trusted news sources in the U.S.
AND LEANED toward the LIBERAL!!!
A) News sources are NOT suppose to BIASED. That's the editorial page. The Commentators page!
Limbaugh ACKNOWLEDGES he is BIASED conservative!
BUT he is NOT a NEWS source!
NOR is TRUMP a NEWS source!
This is such a screwy mixed up poll by the "prestigious" (bull crap) Reynolds Journalism Institute of the University of Missouri!
Limbaugh is not a journalist!
Nor is "Occupy Democrats"! They are not "journalists" i.e. News sources!
The question should have been of these purported "journalism" sources:
ABC,CBS,NBC, MSNBC,FOX, USA Today Wall Street... and so on then this would be a legitimate
poll! But by lumping known BIASED commentators, i.e. Limbaugh, Occupy Democrats, Huffington Post,PBS, NPR, in as "News sources"... Total bull crap!
View attachment 142375

Definition of biased polling according to deplorables : Anything that doesn't make Trump look good.

 

[healthmyths]

These are the most — and the least — trusted news sources in the U.S.
Published: Aug 6, 2017 10:13 a.m. ET

The results were based on a survey of more than 8,000 people conducted by 28 media organizations in the U.S. Participation was voluntary but respondents tended to reside near the news outlets that made the questionnaire available on their websites, and leaned toward the liberal side of the political spectrum.
These are the most — and the least — trusted news sources in the U.S.
AND LEANED toward the LIBERAL!!!
A) News sources are NOT suppose to BIASED. That's the editorial page. The Commentators page!
Limbaugh ACKNOWLEDGES he is BIASED conservative!
BUT he is NOT a NEWS source!
NOR is TRUMP a NEWS source!
This is such a screwy mixed up poll by the "prestigious" (bull crap) Reynolds Journalism Institute of the University of Missouri!
Limbaugh is not a journalist!
Nor is "Occupy Democrats"! They are not "journalists" i.e. News sources!
The question should have been of these purported "journalism" sources:
ABC,CBS,NBC, MSNBC,FOX, USA Today Wall Street... and so on then this would be a legitimate
poll! But by lumping known BIASED commentators, i.e. Limbaugh, Occupy Democrats, Huffington Post,PBS, NPR, in as "News sources"... Total bull crap!
View attachment 142375

Definition of biased polling according to deplorables : Anything that doesn't make Trump look good.

Sorry but the pollsters SAID they people they polled were for the most part "leaned toward the liberal side of the political spectrum."
So tell me where that doesn't show bias poll results?

 

[Mac1958]

HuffPo is clearly slanted. I didn't directly equate them.

I would not be at all surprised if someone like you didn't see it.
.

ONE example of their lies, dupe? Meanwhile your whole movement is based on CRAP: The rich pay too much in taxes, the 2008 corrupt bust was Dems' fault lol, lock her up (and Obama, Lerner, Lynch, Holder, Bill), Obama's policies (none passed except ACA) caused ANYTHING, see sig.- None of it gets into the real world or the US justice system, dingbats.

You can't think of any dishonesty from the Left. Not one example.

I absolutely believe that. I truly do.
.

Neither can you- just RW BS, predictions that were ruined by events, and fake news. Meanwhie, I can't think of any GOP facts either. See sig.

As I said, I believe you.

I have a tremendous respect - an awe, actually - for the power of ideology over the human mind, so I believe you.
.

ZZZZZZZZZ. Hilariously ironic.Check any respected media outlet in the world, dupe, not your USA only Fox, Rush, Breitbart, Beck, Heritage, all billionaire dupe financed CRAP. It's about facts and truth. The GOP is the only party in the modern world that denies socialism, MMGW, universal health care, progressive tax rates, 4 week+ vacations, paid parental leave, $11+ min wage, cheap college, a good ID card and immigration/work controls, cheap college, good infrastructure etc etc. Great job, greedy a-hole/hypocrite GOP and silly dupes!

I voted for Hillary, Einstein.

But keep illustrating my point for me, thanks.

Hardcore partisan ideology -- always fascinating to observe how it creates such simplistic, binary thought, how it distorts perceptions and thought processes.
.

 

[Kosh]

These are the most — and the least — trusted news sources in the U.S.
Published: Aug 6, 2017 10:13 a.m. ET

The results were based on a survey of more than 8,000 people conducted by 28 media organizations in the U.S. Participation was voluntary but respondents tended to reside near the news outlets that made the questionnaire available on their websites, and leaned toward the liberal side of the political spectrum.
These are the most — and the least — trusted news sources in the U.S.
AND LEANED toward the LIBERAL!!!
A) News sources are NOT suppose to BIASED. That's the editorial page. The Commentators page!
Limbaugh ACKNOWLEDGES he is BIASED conservative!
BUT he is NOT a NEWS source!
NOR is TRUMP a NEWS source!
This is such a screwy mixed up poll by the "prestigious" (bull crap) Reynolds Journalism Institute of the University of Missouri!
Limbaugh is not a journalist!
Nor is "Occupy Democrats"! They are not "journalists" i.e. News sources!
The question should have been of these purported "journalism" sources:
ABC,CBS,NBC, MSNBC,FOX, USA Today Wall Street... and so on then this would be a legitimate
poll! But by lumping known BIASED commentators, i.e. Limbaugh, Occupy Democrats, Huffington Post,PBS, NPR, in as "News sources"... Total bull crap!
View attachment 142375

Any poll can be rigged to show what ever they want to show, such as out of 100 people they poll 60 Democrat, 20 republicans and 20 independents, which way do you think the poll will lean?