Evolution is a False Religion not Proven Science.

[PostmodernProph]

The Theory of Evolution makes absolutely no sense. Random molecules bumping into each other created life = LOL

Once you understand how complex a single strand of DNA really is, you have to let go of the current theory of Evolution

You shouldn't say"it makes no sense" simply because it makes no sense to YOU. It's easy to poke holes in the theory of evolution, but much much harder to prove creation. You cannot prove creation by disproving evolution.

/shrugs...and you can't prove man evolved from a single celled creature in a pond of scum by denying creation.....

 

[PostmodernProph]

The Theory of Evolution makes absolutely no sense. Random molecules bumping into each other created life = LOL

Strawman: 2. a weak or sham argument set up to be easily refuted [syn: straw man]
Strawman | Define Strawman at Dictionary.com

No one claims random molecules bumping into each other created life.

actually they do....its called abiogenesis......

 

[PostmodernProph]

The Theory of Evolution makes absolutely no sense. Random molecules bumping into each other created life = LOL

Once you understand how complex a single strand of DNA really is, you have to let go of the current theory of Evolution

Over the course of 500 million years with favorable conditions...? Not that far-fetched.

and why is it that it hasn't happened again in say the last 479 million years?.....different conditions, different life....obviously the conditions for life are better now than they ever have been......

 

[pinqy]

The Theory of Evolution makes absolutely no sense. Random molecules bumping into each other created life = LOL

Strawman: 2. a weak or sham argument set up to be easily refuted [syn: straw man]
Strawman | Define Strawman at Dictionary.com

No one claims random molecules bumping into each other created life.

actually they do....its called abiogenesis......

Nope. That's a straw man version.

 

[Zmrzlina]

Christians need to wake up to this. Evolution is a religion; it is not a science!

I'm not sure if you really understand the science here but there are two distinct parts of evolution. One is the FACT that we've all decended from a common ancestor. The other is the THEORY behind the mechanism of evolution. It is not unlike gravity. Gravity is a FACT, anyone who doesn't believe that is so is welcome to jump off a building. We have THEORIES as to how gravity works but none are proven. Newton came up with one theory and Einstein came up with another. The THEORY changed but the FACT remained.

What makes evolution different from creationism is the difference between science and faith. Anyone can study the natural world and discover evolution because the evidence is there for all to see. Not withstanding Paul's assertion that we all know God is there, no one can come to the story of Genesis by studying the natural world, they need to be told. And since there is no physical evidence for creationism and certainly no mechanism for it, it needs to be taken on faith.

YES!!! MICRO BUT NEVER MACRO!!! NO DOG WILL BECOME A CAT NO MATTER HOW MUCH TIME. no pond scum will become a human,not even one human cell, not even a strand of human DNA. DNA=A DESIGNED PLAN=INFORMATION=HUGE AMOUNTS OF INFORMATION AND EVERY BIT MUT BE RIGHT THE FIRST TIME TO HAVE A LIVING CELL.=PLAN,DESIGN,COMPLEXITY DO NOT EVOLVE FROM POND SCUM. OH!! even pond scum is a design,plan,huge complexity!!! TRY TO THINK!

You do realize that macro evolution is made up of micro evolutions? So conceding that you believe in the latter means that you are implicitly conceding the former.

 

[GISMYS]

i'm not sure if you really understand the science here but there are two distinct parts of evolution. One is the fact that we've all decended from a common ancestor. The other is the theory behind the mechanism of evolution. It is not unlike gravity. Gravity is a fact, anyone who doesn't believe that is so is welcome to jump off a building. We have theories as to how gravity works but none are proven. Newton came up with one theory and einstein came up with another. The theory changed but the fact remained.

What makes evolution different from creationism is the difference between science and faith. Anyone can study the natural world and discover evolution because the evidence is there for all to see. Not withstanding paul's assertion that we all know god is there, no one can come to the story of genesis by studying the natural world, they need to be told. And since there is no physical evidence for creationism and certainly no mechanism for it, it needs to be taken on faith.

yes!!! Micro but never macro!!! No dog will become a cat no matter how much time. No pond scum will become a human,not even one human cell, not even a strand of human dna. Dna=a designed plan=information=huge amounts of information and every bit mut be right the first time to have a living cell.=plan,design,complexity do not evolve from pond scum. Oh!! Even pond scum is a design,plan,huge complexity!!! Try to think!

you do realize that macro evolution is made up of micro evolutions? So conceding that you believe in the latter means that you are implicitly conceding the former.

you may breed dogs for color,size and see change over the years in color ,size and such (micro)but you will never see the dog change into a cat.)macro) no matter how much time.

 

[Zmrzlina]

yes!!! Micro but never macro!!! No dog will become a cat no matter how much time. No pond scum will become a human,not even one human cell, not even a strand of human dna. Dna=a designed plan=information=huge amounts of information and every bit mut be right the first time to have a living cell.=plan,design,complexity do not evolve from pond scum. Oh!! Even pond scum is a design,plan,huge complexity!!! Try to think!

you do realize that macro evolution is made up of micro evolutions? So conceding that you believe in the latter means that you are implicitly conceding the former.

you may breed dogs for color,size and see change over the years in color ,size and such (micro)but you will never see the dog change into a cat.)macro) no matter how much time.

No shit, you don't understand evolutionary biology.

 

[PredFan]

YES!!! MICRO BUT NEVER MACRO!!! NO DOG WILL BECOME A CAT NO MATTER HOW MUCH TIME. no pond scum will become a human,not even one human cell, not even a strand of human DNA. DNA=A DESIGNED PLAN=INFORMATION=HUGE AMOUNTS OF INFORMATION AND EVERY BIT MUT BE RIGHT THE FIRST TIME TO HAVE A LIVING CELL.=PLAN,DESIGN,COMPLEXITY DO NOT EVOLVE FROM POND SCUM. OH!! even pond scum is a design,plan,huge complexity!!! TRY TO THINK!

I see the problem. You have no knowledge of evolution. The Theory of Evolution doesn't say that a dog will become a cat, nor does it say that pond scum will become a human. You should learn more about evolution before you try to criticise it. TRY TO THINK!

well actually, there are many who believe pond scum eventually evolved into human beings......in fact, that's the very type of belief in evolution we reject.....you can't just pretend it doesn't exist.....its what the majority of seculars believe evolution to be......

It wasn't pond scum. Pond scum is a result of life in a stagnant pool of water, life's by products of various metabolic activities plus multi-cellular plant and animal life. None of that existed back then. Anyone who claims that humans came from pond scum doesn't know jack shit about evolution or biology for that matter. It didn't happen, it's never going to happen.

 

[PredFan]

The Theory of Evolution makes absolutely no sense. Random molecules bumping into each other created life = LOL

Once you understand how complex a single strand of DNA really is, you have to let go of the current theory of Evolution

You shouldn't say"it makes no sense" simply because it makes no sense to YOU. It's easy to poke holes in the theory of evolution, but much much harder to prove creation. You cannot prove creation by disproving evolution.

/shrugs...and you can't prove man evolved from a single celled creature in a pond of scum by denying creation.....

I'm not.

1. Man did not evolve from pond scum.
2. I'm using scientific facts to support evolution.
3. Creationists cannot prove creation so they attack evolution.

 

[PredFan]

The Theory of Evolution makes absolutely no sense. Random molecules bumping into each other created life = LOL

Strawman: 2. a weak or sham argument set up to be easily refuted [syn: straw man]
Strawman | Define Strawman at Dictionary.com

No one claims random molecules bumping into each other created life.

actually they do....its called abiogenesis......

No, it isn't.

 

[PredFan]

The Theory of Evolution makes absolutely no sense. Random molecules bumping into each other created life = LOL

Once you understand how complex a single strand of DNA really is, you have to let go of the current theory of Evolution

Over the course of 500 million years with favorable conditions...? Not that far-fetched.

and why is it that it hasn't happened again in say the last 479 million years?.....different conditions, different life....obviously the conditions for life are better now than they ever have been......

Wtf are you talking about? Evolution has been going on continuously.

 

[PredFan]

yes!!! Micro but never macro!!! No dog will become a cat no matter how much time. No pond scum will become a human,not even one human cell, not even a strand of human dna. Dna=a designed plan=information=huge amounts of information and every bit mut be right the first time to have a living cell.=plan,design,complexity do not evolve from pond scum. Oh!! Even pond scum is a design,plan,huge complexity!!! Try to think!

you do realize that macro evolution is made up of micro evolutions? So conceding that you believe in the latter means that you are implicitly conceding the former.

you may breed dogs for color,size and see change over the years in color ,size and such (micro)but you will never see the dog change into a cat.)macro) no matter how much time.

Oh my God how dense are you? No one says that a dog will turn into a cat. Not now not ever.

 

[pinqy]

You know, there is a simple test.
Genesis 30:37-41
37 And Jacob took him rods of green poplar, and of the hazel and chesnut tree; and pilled white strakes in them, and made the white appear which was in the rods.

38 And he set the rods which he had pilled before the flocks in the gutters in the watering troughs when the flocks came to drink, that they should conceive when they came to drink.

39 And the flocks conceived before the rods, and brought forth cattle ringstraked, speckled, and spotted.

40 And Jacob did separate the lambs, and set the faces of the flocks toward the ringstraked, and all the brown in the flock of Laban; and he put his own flocks by themselves, and put them not unto Laban's cattle.

41 And it came to pass, whensoever the stronger cattle did conceive, that Jacob laid the rods before the eyes of the cattle in the gutters, that they might conceive among the rods.

But according to Evolution and Genetics, the rods would have no effect on the offspring.

So all we have to do is copy Jacob and see which prediction is correct: Will trees stripped of bark cause similar patterns as the Bible states, or will there be no effect as science states?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The Theory of Evolution makes absolutely no sense. Random molecules bumping into each other created life = LOL

Once you understand how complex a single strand of DNA really is, you have to let go of the current theory of Evolution

You shouldn't say"it makes no sense" simply because it makes no sense to YOU. It's easy to poke holes in the theory of evolution, but much much harder to prove creation. You cannot prove creation by disproving evolution.

It makes no sense because the odds of molecules randomly forming amino acids and proteins are almost infinity - 1.

The math means evolution is impossible

 

[Zmrzlina]

The Theory of Evolution makes absolutely no sense. Random molecules bumping into each other created life = LOL

Once you understand how complex a single strand of DNA really is, you have to let go of the current theory of Evolution

You shouldn't say"it makes no sense" simply because it makes no sense to YOU. It's easy to poke holes in the theory of evolution, but much much harder to prove creation. You cannot prove creation by disproving evolution.

It makes no sense because the odds of molecules randomly forming amino acids and proteins are almost infinity - 1.

The math means evolution is impossible

You should provide a source when you make a claim like that.

 

[GISMYS]

you do realize that macro evolution is made up of micro evolutions? So conceding that you believe in the latter means that you are implicitly conceding the former.

you may breed dogs for color,size and see change over the years in color ,size and such (micro)but you will never see the dog change into a cat.)macro) no matter how much time.

Oh my God how dense are you? No one says that a dog will turn into a cat. Not now not ever.

BUT does pond scum become a human with time and chance??? lol!!! IF not by GOD,how and why did life start??? answer =little sin loving,GOD rejecting man has no answer just a silly unproven theory. Hoping that GOD is not real so they won't face their final judgment day!! DREAM ON!!!

 

[rdean]

The Theory of Evolution makes absolutely no sense. Random molecules bumping into each other created life = LOL

Once you understand how complex a single strand of DNA really is, you have to let go of the current theory of Evolution

You shouldn't say"it makes no sense" simply because it makes no sense to YOU. It's easy to poke holes in the theory of evolution, but much much harder to prove creation. You cannot prove creation by disproving evolution.

Sure you can. It's magic. Magic doesn't need "proof". It only needs little sparkly lights.

 

[PostmodernProph]

Strawman: 2. a weak or sham argument set up to be easily refuted [syn: straw man]
Strawman | Define Strawman at Dictionary.com

No one claims random molecules bumping into each other created life.

actually they do....its called abiogenesis......

Nope. That's a straw man version.

???....you have another version?.....

 

[PostmodernProph]

I'm not sure if you really understand the science here but there are two distinct parts of evolution. One is the FACT that we've all decended from a common ancestor. The other is the THEORY behind the mechanism of evolution. It is not unlike gravity. Gravity is a FACT, anyone who doesn't believe that is so is welcome to jump off a building. We have THEORIES as to how gravity works but none are proven. Newton came up with one theory and Einstein came up with another. The THEORY changed but the FACT remained.

What makes evolution different from creationism is the difference between science and faith. Anyone can study the natural world and discover evolution because the evidence is there for all to see. Not withstanding Paul's assertion that we all know God is there, no one can come to the story of Genesis by studying the natural world, they need to be told. And since there is no physical evidence for creationism and certainly no mechanism for it, it needs to be taken on faith.

YES!!! MICRO BUT NEVER MACRO!!! NO DOG WILL BECOME A CAT NO MATTER HOW MUCH TIME. no pond scum will become a human,not even one human cell, not even a strand of human DNA. DNA=A DESIGNED PLAN=INFORMATION=HUGE AMOUNTS OF INFORMATION AND EVERY BIT MUT BE RIGHT THE FIRST TIME TO HAVE A LIVING CELL.=PLAN,DESIGN,COMPLEXITY DO NOT EVOLVE FROM POND SCUM. OH!! even pond scum is a design,plan,huge complexity!!! TRY TO THINK!

You do realize that macro evolution is made up of micro evolutions? So conceding that you believe in the latter means that you are implicitly conceding the former.

no......not a requirement......I can believe 37k types of beetles evolved without believing the first beetle was a worm......

 

[PostmodernProph]

you do realize that macro evolution is made up of micro evolutions? So conceding that you believe in the latter means that you are implicitly conceding the former.

you may breed dogs for color,size and see change over the years in color ,size and such (micro)but you will never see the dog change into a cat.)macro) no matter how much time.

No shit, you don't understand evolutionary biology.

/shrugs.....actually if you limit it to what science says about evolutionary biology he may know than you do........