Exactly what and why was the 2nd amendment written like it is

[danielpalos]

there are no natural rights in our Second Amendment.

Where did I say anything about "natural rights"?

that is where you would have to get Individual rights to do, what is claimed by the right wing.

Go peddle your bullshit to them, I'm talking about rights granted by our Constitution.

You don't know what You are talking about; like Usual for the right wing.

Natural rights are recognized and secured in State Constitutions, not our Second Amendment.

Again, where did I mention anything about natural rights?

You have a comprehension problem.

You don't know what you are talking about. That is all.

 

[WinterBorn]

No. THey are completely unqualified.

Regulate them well, until there are no more excuses, only results.

Regulating is not the same as training. They can be regulated and they would still be completely unqualified.

it is the same. Wellness of regulation, requires discipline and training.

Regulation for a militia is most certainly NOT the same as the training to be a qualified law enforcement officer. Not even close.

Yes, it must. There is no appeal to ignorance of the law.

No, it isn't. Training for a police officer is completely different from militia training. Militia training is basically military training. Not law enforcement.

 

[WinterBorn]

Applying 21st Century mores to 18th Century thinking is an exercise in vanity.

The militia is bound to the right. The right is not bound to the militia.

If you want to follow the meaning of the 2nd amendment, the Militia is bound to the Government which should be neither right nor left, it just is.

Which is why there is a comma separating the militia from the people in the Second...

They knew that a government, a country, needed an armed force to defend itself and its citizens. At the same time, they had just broken free from a ruler and government they considered tyrannical and recognized that there is always the potential for a ruler or government to go bad, thus the right of the people to keep and bear Arms...

The militia is necessary, but that does not preclude the people being armed.

Some might argue that this applies only to the federal government and that state and local governments are free to infringe all they want... but that's another discussion...

there are no natural rights in our Second Amendment.

Whether the rights are natural or not, the 2nd guarantees an individual right.

No, it doesn't. It guarantees a civil right that is applied to individuals.[/QUO]

No, it has repeatedly been ruled an individual right.

 

[danielpalos]

Regulate them well, until there are no more excuses, only results.

Regulating is not the same as training. They can be regulated and they would still be completely unqualified.

it is the same. Wellness of regulation, requires discipline and training.

Regulation for a militia is most certainly NOT the same as the training to be a qualified law enforcement officer. Not even close.

Yes, it must. There is no appeal to ignorance of the law.

No, it isn't. Training for a police officer is completely different from militia training. Militia training is basically military training. Not law enforcement.

It is why, the militia should be well regulated, to lower our security problems.

 

[Marion Morrison]

I'd say so leftists faggots can't do exactly what they're trying to.

Aww, no.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Regulating is not the same as training. They can be regulated and they would still be completely unqualified.

it is the same. Wellness of regulation, requires discipline and training.

Regulation for a militia is most certainly NOT the same as the training to be a qualified law enforcement officer. Not even close.

Yes, it must. There is no appeal to ignorance of the law.

No, it isn't. Training for a police officer is completely different from militia training. Militia training is basically military training. Not law enforcement.

It is why, the militia should be well regulated, to lower our security problems.

"Well regulated" means "in proper working order"
Beta cuck.

 

[danielpalos]

it is the same. Wellness of regulation, requires discipline and training.

Regulation for a militia is most certainly NOT the same as the training to be a qualified law enforcement officer. Not even close.

Yes, it must. There is no appeal to ignorance of the law.

No, it isn't. Training for a police officer is completely different from militia training. Militia training is basically military training. Not law enforcement.

It is why, the militia should be well regulated, to lower our security problems.

"Well regulated" means "in proper working order"
Beta cuck.

No, it doesn't. That is why, nobody on the left takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

The right wing has nothing but appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Wellness of Regulation for the Militia of the United States must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Regulation for a militia is most certainly NOT the same as the training to be a qualified law enforcement officer. Not even close.

Yes, it must. There is no appeal to ignorance of the law.

No, it isn't. Training for a police officer is completely different from militia training. Militia training is basically military training. Not law enforcement.

It is why, the militia should be well regulated, to lower our security problems.

"Well regulated" means "in proper working order"
Beta cuck.

No, it doesn't. That is why, nobody on the left takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

The right wing has nothing but appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Wellness of Regulation for the Militia of the United States must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

Actually it does.

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order."

http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, it must. There is no appeal to ignorance of the law.

No, it isn't. Training for a police officer is completely different from militia training. Militia training is basically military training. Not law enforcement.

It is why, the militia should be well regulated, to lower our security problems.

"Well regulated" means "in proper working order"
Beta cuck.

No, it doesn't. That is why, nobody on the left takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

The right wing has nothing but appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Wellness of Regulation for the Militia of the United States must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

Actually it does.

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order."

http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

There is no appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land, right wingers; who's side are y'all on, anyway.

 

[Marion Morrison]

No, it isn't. Training for a police officer is completely different from militia training. Militia training is basically military training. Not law enforcement.

It is why, the militia should be well regulated, to lower our security problems.

"Well regulated" means "in proper working order"
Beta cuck.

No, it doesn't. That is why, nobody on the left takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

The right wing has nothing but appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Wellness of Regulation for the Militia of the United States must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

Actually it does.

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order."

http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

There is no appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land, right wingers; who's side are y'all on, anyway.

The side of free American citizens, you washy washy reject.

danielpalos , the guy that can't get laid in a massage parlor.

 

[danielpalos]

It is why, the militia should be well regulated, to lower our security problems.

"Well regulated" means "in proper working order"
Beta cuck.

No, it doesn't. That is why, nobody on the left takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

The right wing has nothing but appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Wellness of Regulation for the Militia of the United States must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

Actually it does.

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order."

http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

There is no appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land, right wingers; who's side are y'all on, anyway.

The side of free American citizens, you washy washy reject.

with nothing but appeals to ignorance? i don't think so.

 

[Marion Morrison]

"Well regulated" means "in proper working order"
Beta cuck.

No, it doesn't. That is why, nobody on the left takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

The right wing has nothing but appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Wellness of Regulation for the Militia of the United States must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

Actually it does.

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order."

http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

There is no appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land, right wingers; who's side are y'all on, anyway.

The side of free American citizens, you washy washy reject.

with nothing but appeals to ignorance? i don't think so.

I've had more handjobs than you've ever dreamed about, boy.

 

[Pop23]

"Well regulated" means "in proper working order"
Beta cuck.

No, it doesn't. That is why, nobody on the left takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

The right wing has nothing but appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Wellness of Regulation for the Militia of the United States must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

Actually it does.

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order."

http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

There is no appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land, right wingers; who's side are y'all on, anyway.

The side of free American citizens, you washy washy reject.

with nothing but appeals to ignorance? i don't think so.

You are ignorant, and unappealing

 

[Pop23]

"Well regulated" means "in proper working order"
Beta cuck.

No, it doesn't. That is why, nobody on the left takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

The right wing has nothing but appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Wellness of Regulation for the Militia of the United States must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

Actually it does.

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order."

http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

There is no appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land, right wingers; who's side are y'all on, anyway.

The side of free American citizens, you washy washy reject.

with nothing but appeals to ignorance? i don't think so.

You do realize that by writing that, you look a fool, right?

 

[danielpalos]

No, it doesn't. That is why, nobody on the left takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

The right wing has nothing but appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

Wellness of Regulation for the Militia of the United States must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

Actually it does.

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order."

http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

There is no appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land, right wingers; who's side are y'all on, anyway.

The side of free American citizens, you washy washy reject.

with nothing but appeals to ignorance? i don't think so.

You are ignorant, and unappealing

so what; you have nothing but fallacy.

 

[danielpalos]

No, it doesn't. That is why, nobody on the left takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

The right wing has nothing but appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

Wellness of Regulation for the Militia of the United States must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

Actually it does.

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order."

http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

There is no appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land, right wingers; who's side are y'all on, anyway.

The side of free American citizens, you washy washy reject.

with nothing but appeals to ignorance? i don't think so.

You do realize that by writing that, you look a fool, right?

the ones who resort to the most fallacies, are the most foolish.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Actually it does.

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order."

http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

There is no appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land, right wingers; who's side are y'all on, anyway.

The side of free American citizens, you washy washy reject.

with nothing but appeals to ignorance? i don't think so.

You are ignorant, and unappealing

so what; you have nothing but fallacy.

I disagree, and you fail, next!

 

[Pop23]

Actually it does.

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order."

http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

There is no appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land, right wingers; who's side are y'all on, anyway.

The side of free American citizens, you washy washy reject.

with nothing but appeals to ignorance? i don't think so.

You are ignorant, and unappealing

so what; you have nothing but fallacy.

And a massive dick.

Which makes you a fool and the lesser of me.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land, right wingers; who's side are y'all on, anyway.

The side of free American citizens, you washy washy reject.

with nothing but appeals to ignorance? i don't think so.

You are ignorant, and unappealing

so what; you have nothing but fallacy.

I disagree, and you fail, next!

you have nothing but fallacy. i don't even have to disagree.

 

[Pop23]

Actually it does.

"The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order."

http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

There is no appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land, right wingers; who's side are y'all on, anyway.

The side of free American citizens, you washy washy reject.

with nothing but appeals to ignorance? i don't think so.

You do realize that by writing that, you look a fool, right?

the ones who resort to the most fallacies, are the most foolish.

You like looking all girly?