Exposing the ‘Whistleblower:’ Judicial Watch Sues CIA, DOJ for Eric Ciaramella Docs

[bripat9643]

Let’s see this Wizard behind the curtain.

Exposing the ‘Whistleblower:’ Judicial Watch Sues CIA, DOJ for Eric Ciaramella Docs.

The truth is dangerous to the system.

It is when it’s a demofk, everyone must recuse themselves so the truth doesn’t come out? Or like in a Clinton fashion someone is eliminated like Epstein. That fking damn truth isn’t a leftist’s friend

According to Democrat logic, anyone who is actually motivated to prosecute the criminals must recuse themselves if the accused are Democrats.

Your entire aristocracy was into fucking kids.

My "aristocracy?" I didn't know I had one. Do you actually have some evidence to support this slander?

 

[jc456]

Let’s see this Wizard behind the curtain.

Exposing the ‘Whistleblower:’ Judicial Watch Sues CIA, DOJ for Eric Ciaramella Docs.

The truth is dangerous to the system.

It is when it’s a demofk, everyone must recuse themselves so the truth doesn’t come out? Or like in a Clinton fashion someone is eliminated like Epstein. That fking damn truth isn’t a leftist’s friend

According to Democrat logic, anyone who is actually motivated to prosecute the criminals must recuse themselves if the accused are Democrats.

Your entire aristocracy was into fucking kids.

Name one

 

[jc456]

Let’s see this Wizard behind the curtain.

Exposing the ‘Whistleblower:’ Judicial Watch Sues CIA, DOJ for Eric Ciaramella Docs.

The truth is dangerous to the system.

It is when it’s a demofk, everyone must recuse themselves so the truth doesn’t come out? Or like in a Clinton fashion someone is eliminated like Epstein. That fking damn truth isn’t a leftist’s friend

According to Democrat logic, anyone who is actually motivated to prosecute the criminals must recuse themselves if the accused are Democrats.

Your entire aristocracy was into fucking kids.

My "aristocracy?" I didn't know I had one. Do you actually have some evidence to support this slander?

I asked him to name one

 

[Weatherman2020]

The truth is dangerous to the system.

It is when it’s a demofk, everyone must recuse themselves so the truth doesn’t come out? Or like in a Clinton fashion someone is eliminated like Epstein. That fking damn truth isn’t a leftist’s friend

According to Democrat logic, anyone who is actually motivated to prosecute the criminals must recuse themselves if the accused are Democrats.

Your entire aristocracy was into fucking kids.

My "aristocracy?" I didn't know I had one. Do you actually have some evidence to support this slander?

I asked him to name one

So far there’s a long list of Democrats who’ve either been arrested for playing with kids or are highly suspect.

 

[jc456]

It is when it’s a demofk, everyone must recuse themselves so the truth doesn’t come out? Or like in a Clinton fashion someone is eliminated like Epstein. That fking damn truth isn’t a leftist’s friend

According to Democrat logic, anyone who is actually motivated to prosecute the criminals must recuse themselves if the accused are Democrats.

Your entire aristocracy was into fucking kids.

My "aristocracy?" I didn't know I had one. Do you actually have some evidence to support this slander?

I asked him to name one

So far there’s a long list of Democrats who’ve either been arrested for playing with kids or are highly suspect.

All of fking Hollywood

 

[Dragonlady]

Let’s see this Wizard behind the curtain.

Exposing the ‘Whistleblower:’ Judicial Watch Sues CIA, DOJ for Eric Ciaramella Docs.

PJ Media, and Judicial Watch. Good luck with that:

PJ Media - Media Bias/Fact Check

Overall, we rate PJ Media to be borderline Questionable based on numerous failed fact checks, however they do fall just below the threshold and are therefore rated Right Biased and Mixed for factual reporting.

There you go again, using biased Leftard sources as ‘fact’ checking.
Hilarious.

And ask Dan Rather about PJ Media. He’s retired because of them.

Remember Dan? FAKE BUT ACCURATE DAN??

Even a clock that's stopped is right twice a day. I understand that at one time, InfoWars had a factual story, but that was over 15 years ago.

PJ Media failed so many fact checks, they're questionable at best. Couple them with Judicial Watch, which has never won a single court case, other than FOI requests, and has found NOTHING against anyone, ever, and you have "fake news". When a "questionable" website posts a piece like this, you need verification from a better source. Why don't you fools do your own verifications before posting. Then you won't look so gullible and lazy.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Let’s see this Wizard behind the curtain.

Exposing the ‘Whistleblower:’ Judicial Watch Sues CIA, DOJ for Eric Ciaramella Docs.

PJ Media, and Judicial Watch. Good luck with that:

PJ Media - Media Bias/Fact Check

Overall, we rate PJ Media to be borderline Questionable based on numerous failed fact checks, however they do fall just below the threshold and are therefore rated Right Biased and Mixed for factual reporting.

There you go again, using biased Leftard sources as ‘fact’ checking.
Hilarious.

And ask Dan Rather about PJ Media. He’s retired because of them.

Remember Dan? FAKE BUT ACCURATE DAN??

Even a clock that's stopped is right twice a day. I understand that at one time, InfoWars had a factual story, but that was over 15 years ago.

PJ Media failed so many fact checks, they're questionable at best. Couple them with Judicial Watch, which has never won a single court case, other than FOI requests, and has found NOTHING against anyone, ever, and you have "fake news". When a "questionable" website posts a piece like this, you need verification from a better source. Why don't you fools do your own verifications before posting. Then you won't look so gullible and lazy.

Topic is Judicial Watch, and they’ve got a lawsuit going to expose yet another Leftard myth.

 

[bripat9643]

It is when it’s a demofk, everyone must recuse themselves so the truth doesn’t come out? Or like in a Clinton fashion someone is eliminated like Epstein. That fking damn truth isn’t a leftist’s friend

According to Democrat logic, anyone who is actually motivated to prosecute the criminals must recuse themselves if the accused are Democrats.

Your entire aristocracy was into fucking kids.

My "aristocracy?" I didn't know I had one. Do you actually have some evidence to support this slander?

I asked him to name one

So far there’s a long list of Democrats who’ve either been arrested for playing with kids or are highly suspect.

Anthony Wiener being prime among them.

 

[Oddball]

Look up why Whistleblower laws were put in place, Orange Rump Simpletons.

He's not a whistleblower....He's the sock puppet for a scumbucket leaker.

 

[Slade3200]

Let’s see this Wizard behind the curtain.

Exposing the ‘Whistleblower:’ Judicial Watch Sues CIA, DOJ for Eric Ciaramella Docs.

Another road to nowhere waste of time and money. Bravo

ROFL! Yeah, right, and the Mueller witch hunt was money well spent.

Mueller was a waste of time as well. Nice deflection though

 

[bripat9643]

Let’s see this Wizard behind the curtain.

Exposing the ‘Whistleblower:’ Judicial Watch Sues CIA, DOJ for Eric Ciaramella Docs.

Another road to nowhere waste of time and money. Bravo

ROFL! Yeah, right, and the Mueller witch hunt was money well spent.

Mueller was a waste of time as well. Nice deflection though

Exposing the "whistleblower" will be money well spent.

 

[Slade3200]

Let’s see this Wizard behind the curtain.

Exposing the ‘Whistleblower:’ Judicial Watch Sues CIA, DOJ for Eric Ciaramella Docs.

Another road to nowhere waste of time and money. Bravo

ROFL! Yeah, right, and the Mueller witch hunt was money well spent.

Mueller was a waste of time as well. Nice deflection though

Exposing the "whistleblower" will be money well spent.

And the Dems would say exposing Trump and his associates was money well spent. You and they are all of the same hypocritical partisan mindset.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Let’s see this Wizard behind the curtain.

Exposing the ‘Whistleblower:’ Judicial Watch Sues CIA, DOJ for Eric Ciaramella Docs.

Another road to nowhere waste of time and money. Bravo

ROFL! Yeah, right, and the Mueller witch hunt was money well spent.

Mueller was a waste of time as well. Nice deflection though

Exposing the "whistleblower" will be money well spent.

And the Dems would say exposing Trump and his associates was money well spent. You and they are all of the same hypocritical partisan mindset.

Too late. Dems spent hundreds of millions and three years and all they got was a ORANGE MAN BAD T shirt.

 

[Slade3200]

Another road to nowhere waste of time and money. Bravo

ROFL! Yeah, right, and the Mueller witch hunt was money well spent.

Mueller was a waste of time as well. Nice deflection though

Exposing the "whistleblower" will be money well spent.

And the Dems would say exposing Trump and his associates was money well spent. You and they are all of the same hypocritical partisan mindset.

Too late. Dems spent hundreds of millions and three years and all they got was a ORANGE MAN BAD T shirt.

which Dems spent hundreds of millions? And which Dems started and controlled the Mueller investigation? Can you name them?

 

[bripat9643]

Let’s see this Wizard behind the curtain.

Exposing the ‘Whistleblower:’ Judicial Watch Sues CIA, DOJ for Eric Ciaramella Docs.

Another road to nowhere waste of time and money. Bravo

ROFL! Yeah, right, and the Mueller witch hunt was money well spent.

Mueller was a waste of time as well. Nice deflection though

Exposing the "whistleblower" will be money well spent.

And the Dems would say exposing Trump and his associates was money well spent. You and they are all of the same hypocritical partisan mindset.

There was nothing to "expose," douchebag. All the facts were know the minute Trump released the transcript.

 

[bripat9643]

ROFL! Yeah, right, and the Mueller witch hunt was money well spent.

Mueller was a waste of time as well. Nice deflection though

Exposing the "whistleblower" will be money well spent.

And the Dems would say exposing Trump and his associates was money well spent. You and they are all of the same hypocritical partisan mindset.

Too late. Dems spent hundreds of millions and three years and all they got was a ORANGE MAN BAD T shirt.

which Dems spent hundreds of millions? And which Dems started and controlled the Mueller investigation? Can you name them?

Weinstein.

 

[Slade3200]

Another road to nowhere waste of time and money. Bravo

ROFL! Yeah, right, and the Mueller witch hunt was money well spent.

Mueller was a waste of time as well. Nice deflection though

Exposing the "whistleblower" will be money well spent.

And the Dems would say exposing Trump and his associates was money well spent. You and they are all of the same hypocritical partisan mindset.

There was nothing to "expose," douchebag. All the facts were know the minute Trump released the transcript.

The transcript has nothing to do with the Mueller investigation. Try and keep up tonto

 

[Slade3200]

Mueller was a waste of time as well. Nice deflection though

Exposing the "whistleblower" will be money well spent.

And the Dems would say exposing Trump and his associates was money well spent. You and they are all of the same hypocritical partisan mindset.

Too late. Dems spent hundreds of millions and three years and all they got was a ORANGE MAN BAD T shirt.

which Dems spent hundreds of millions? And which Dems started and controlled the Mueller investigation? Can you name them?

Weinstein.

How do you think Weinstein started and controlled the Muller investigation smart guy?! Wow, you’ve had too much egg nog today

 

[bripat9643]

ROFL! Yeah, right, and the Mueller witch hunt was money well spent.

Mueller was a waste of time as well. Nice deflection though

Exposing the "whistleblower" will be money well spent.

And the Dems would say exposing Trump and his associates was money well spent. You and they are all of the same hypocritical partisan mindset.

There was nothing to "expose," douchebag. All the facts were know the minute Trump released the transcript.

The transcript has nothing to do with the Mueller investigation. Try and keep up tonto

It has a lot to do with the whistleblower, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

Exposing the "whistleblower" will be money well spent.

And the Dems would say exposing Trump and his associates was money well spent. You and they are all of the same hypocritical partisan mindset.

Too late. Dems spent hundreds of millions and three years and all they got was a ORANGE MAN BAD T shirt.

which Dems spent hundreds of millions? And which Dems started and controlled the Mueller investigation? Can you name them?

Weinstein.

How do you think Weinstein started and controlled the Muller investigation smart guy?! Wow, you’ve had too much egg nog today

He didn't start it, but he definitely controlled it. Comey started it. He may not be a Republican, but he's definitely a Hillary supporter and a Trump hater. The same goes for that weasel Rosenstein.