Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hmmmmmmm. Father marries son. If that's legal then so is father marries daughter.How is this even remotely related to incest?
I wish them well and hope the meddlers will mind their own business.
bripat9643 Why is this in Politics?
Actually, there's no valid incest argument against same sex incestuous marriages because the primary traditional argument against incest has always been the possible genetic consequences of two closely related people having children.
hmmmmmmm. Father marries son. If that's legal then so is father marries daughter.How is this even remotely related to incest?
I wish them well and hope the meddlers will mind their own business.
bripat9643 Why is this in Politics?
Are you really such a moron that I have to spell this out for you in excruciating detail?
No need to answer. That was purely a rhetorical question.
Actually, there's no valid incest argument against same sex incestuous marriages because the primary traditional argument against incest has always been the possible genetic consequences of two closely related people having children.
That's precisely the argument against incestuous marriage, you stupid fuck. However, the gay marriage flacks claim that marriage has nothing to do with reproduction, so that argument is off the table.
You and your ilk keep speaking out of both sides of your mouth.
hmmmmmmm. Father marries son. If that's legal then so is father marries daughter.How is this even remotely related to incest?
I wish them well and hope the meddlers will mind their own business.
bripat9643 Why is this in Politics?
Are you really such a moron that I have to spell this out for you in excruciating detail?
No need to answer. That was purely a rhetorical question.
Fuck. It ISN'T INCEST IF THEY AREN'T RELATED.So let's see, they're a couple for 50 years who wanted to be able to visit each other in the hospital and help each other in case of an emergency but they couldn't because the law prevented them; so they used adoption as a loophole.
I'm happy for them
It's a legal basis for justifying incestuous marriages.
How many times is your nonsense going to be spewed???
Your ridiculous. The adoption would never have happened had gay marriage been an option.Fuck. It ISN'T INCEST IF THEY AREN'T RELATED.So let's see, they're a couple for 50 years who wanted to be able to visit each other in the hospital and help each other in case of an emergency but they couldn't because the law prevented them; so they used adoption as a loophole.
I'm happy for them
It's a legal basis for justifying incestuous marriages.
How many times is your nonsense going to be spewed???
If a parent can marry his adopted child, then how can anyone argue against allowing a parent to marry his biological child? What's the legal distinction?
Your ridiculous. The adoption would never have happened had gay marriage been an option.Fuck. It ISN'T INCEST IF THEY AREN'T RELATED.So let's see, they're a couple for 50 years who wanted to be able to visit each other in the hospital and help each other in case of an emergency but they couldn't because the law prevented them; so they used adoption as a loophole.
I'm happy for them
It's a legal basis for justifying incestuous marriages.
How many times is your nonsense going to be spewed???
If a parent can marry his adopted child, then how can anyone argue against allowing a parent to marry his biological child? What's the legal distinction?
What's the legal distinction?
Incest laws do not address adoption. There question solved.Your ridiculous. The adoption would never have happened had gay marriage been an option.Fuck. It ISN'T INCEST IF THEY AREN'T RELATED.So let's see, they're a couple for 50 years who wanted to be able to visit each other in the hospital and help each other in case of an emergency but they couldn't because the law prevented them; so they used adoption as a loophole.
I'm happy for them
It's a legal basis for justifying incestuous marriages.
How many times is your nonsense going to be spewed???
If a parent can marry his adopted child, then how can anyone argue against allowing a parent to marry his biological child? What's the legal distinction?
That doesn't answer the question.
Biology.Fuck. It ISN'T INCEST IF THEY AREN'T RELATED.So let's see, they're a couple for 50 years who wanted to be able to visit each other in the hospital and help each other in case of an emergency but they couldn't because the law prevented them; so they used adoption as a loophole.
I'm happy for them
It's a legal basis for justifying incestuous marriages.
How many times is your nonsense going to be spewed???
If a parent can marry his adopted child, then how can anyone argue against allowing a parent to marry his biological child? What's the legal distinction?
There's nothing in the Constitution about marriage. It's defined at the state level. Is that news to you? You also missed my point, a relationship isn't a person so you can't claim it has protection.There is a constitutional right to equal protection under the law. There are laws applicable to marriage and the rights thereof.What is relevant is that a homosexual relationship isn't a person. You have the right to go to a Catholic church or sodomize a man but there's no Constitutional right to a marriage. Incest and racial laws were put in place because of reproduction (it's a birds and bees thing, you wouldn't understand) so the whole gay marriage schtick is to mimic traditional marriages while condemning tradition.It is totally irrelevant whether gays are born that way or not. You don't have to be born in some certain way in order to have rights.
No one for example has to be born Catholic in order to have the right to practice Catholicism.
If a parent can marry his adopted child, then how can anyone argue against allowing a parent to marry his biological child? What's the legal distinction?
What is relevant is that a homosexual relationship isn't a person. You have the right to go to a Catholic church or sodomize a man but there's no Constitutional right to a marriage. Incest and racial laws were put in place because of reproduction (it's a birds and bees thing, you wouldn't understand) so the whole gay marriage schtick is to mimic traditional marriages while condemning tradition.It is totally irrelevant whether gays are born that way or not. You don't have to be born in some certain way in order to have rights.
No one for example has to be born Catholic in order to have the right to practice Catholicism.
There is a constitutional right to equal protection under the law. There are laws applicable to marriage and the rights thereof.
does that apply to multiple person marriages? why would you discriminate against them? why would you prevent them from marrying who they love?
This is where gay marriage will lead----------------to the complete destruction of our culture.
So let's see, they're a couple for 50 years who wanted to be able to visit each other in the hospital and help each other in case of an emergency but they couldn't because the law prevented them; so they used adoption as a loophole.
I'm happy for them
Technically that's true. If he had adopted a child, the law would now allow a parent/child relationship to morph into a marriage. And that cannot be kept from natural parent/children. The refusal would be legally arbitrary and unfair. Good catch there bripat!It's a legal basis for justifying incestuous marriages.
You would probably like to be one of them. Sick.So let's see, they're a couple for 50 years who wanted to be able to visit each other in the hospital and help each other in case of an emergency but they couldn't because the law prevented them; so they used adoption as a loophole.
I'm happy for them
So let's see, they're a couple for 50 years who wanted to be able to visit each other in the hospital and help each other in case of an emergency but they couldn't because the law prevented them; so they used adoption as a loophole.
I'm happy for them
It's a legal basis for justifying incestuous marriages.
So let's see, they're a couple for 50 years who wanted to be able to visit each other in the hospital and help each other in case of an emergency but they couldn't because the law prevented them; so they used adoption as a loophole.
I'm happy for them
It's a legal basis for justifying incestuous marriages.
I am sure you will be rushing out to take advantage of your interpretation of it.
Will you be marrying your mother or father?
