FBI Closing in on Huma and Hilly?

[Just_Saying]

I think if everybody on the planet even those living in caves was given a polygraph and asked the question if they thought Hillary Clinton was not only guilty of espionage in the email matter but also guilty of other felonies as well, the meter would crazy saying she was. But here's the thing...none of her supporters care. Nor do any of her corrupt cronies in government. And apparently most on the right have backed off as well no doubt because they've either been blackmailed or have received credible death threats. Otherwise why wouldn't they go after her either? If blackmail, was it because information would go public regarding mistresses or affairs in their past? Or worse, maybe crimes they themselves committed as well? Knowing the Clinton's past and what a serious crime family they are, I'm guessing they have some pretty good investigators on their payrolls. No doubt the power they have over people who could do them harm is blackmail. If nothing can be found on their subject, then they probably try to buy them off. Last resort they put a hit on them? Numerous people have mysteriously been found dead that were connected to the Clinton's with the latest being Seth Rich.

How many times has Huma dumped her husband only to suddenly take him back in a relatively small timeframe? thats not normal behaviour for an aggrieved wife.

Maybe because according to law a husband can't testify against his wife and vice versa?

 

[Just_Saying]

FBI agents and Department of Justice prosecutors raided a home possibly linked to former Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin in Dearborn, Michigan last week.

The home on Jonathon Street is reportedly owned by a subsidiary of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs – an Abedin family business that employs Huma’s brother and sister. Huma had worked for the company in the past. FBI Raids Possible Abedin-linked home in Dearborn, MI – What we know
Huma did an about face and took her husband back again...speculation over spousal immunity

Hey anyone know what became of Debbie Wasserman's Schultz's laptop that was confiscated by the detective?



<---- also VERY INFORMATIVE

 

[S.J.]

Yeah, when she gave them 20% of the world's supply of uranium.

When we had just pointed out how Trumptards constantly fall for every bit of idiot propaganda, demonstrating a bit of idiot propaganda that you fell for was probably not your best choice.

Not propaganda if it's true, snowflake.
How the Clintons Sold Out U.S. National Interests to the Putin Regime

Your source left out a few tidbits.

The mines are operated by a US subsidiary and cannot export uranium out of the country. These mines in question only produce less than 5% of the uranium we need every year.

We have to import 80% of what our needs are. All of the US mines produce 20% of what we need. The mines owned by the Russian company produces 20% of that. So that 20% in reality is 4% of the uranium we use. Also to export any uranium the company would need a special license. None have been issued.

The facts behind Trump’s repeated claim about Hillary Clinton’s role in the Russian uranium deal

Trump and his campaign claim that Clinton “gave” or “handed over” 20 percent of American uranium rights to the Russians. Through the Uranium One deal, the Russian state-owned nuclear energy company does now have control over 20 percent of U.S. uranium extraction capacity. But it cannot export the uranium.

In 2010, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States approved the sale of the majority of the shares to the Russians. The State Department was one of nine agencies on the committee that approved the deal. The deal was also separately approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

There is no evidence Clinton herself got involved in the deal personally, and it is highly questionable that this deal even rose to the level of the secretary of state. Theoretically, as Schweizer says, Clinton could have intervened. But even then, it ultimately would have been Obama’s decision whether to suspend or block the deal.

Now, do you have a "credible" link (preferably one that doesn't require me to subscribe to left wing propaganda before I can read it)?