FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Fizz]

It appears quite obvious that my opposition has no independently verified evidence of the steel core columns whereas I do have such evidence supporting the existence of the concrete core.

Clearly, Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

So all they can do is try and change the subject.

clearly you are a fucking moron. (nice car, by the way).

not only do you lie and claim ronertson said something he never said, then you misrepresent oxford, but the two references you use contradict each other!! what a fucking idiot!!!!!

oxford says "steel and concrete" while you lie and claim robertson says "concrete".

well guess what, deadbeat. ONE OF THEM MUST BE WRONG. its either concrete or its steel and concrete. they cant both be right.

and here is a very small portion of the evidence that proves the WTC had a STEEL CORE.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB6xdCS9NJU]YouTube - 9/11: Why They Fell pt 2[/ame]


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqDTEZIdg7g&feature=PlayList&p=A6382FD1025BACE9&index=62]YouTube - WTC 1&2 UNIQUE DESIGN.[/ame]


"For a combination of historical, cultural and economic reasons, tall, concrete-core buildings dedicated to office use are unusual in New York, where builders prefer the wallboard-enclosed cores with steel frames that Mr. Robertson pioneered in the trade center."
New York Timeshere


"Engineers are still debating whether the Twin Towers' unique structure should be credited for surviving the initial crashes, or blamed for collapsing in the subsequent fires, or both. But the point is that it was unique, utilizing closely spaced columns connected to a steel core by relatively lightweight floor trusses. "
Newsweek. Newsweek.com


"Each of the towers, more than 200 ft. wide on each side, contained a central steel core surrounded by open office space. Eighteen-inch steel tubes ran vertically along the outside, providing much of the support for the building"
Time Magazine.TIME.com


"The twin towers were the first supertall buildings designed without any masonry. Worried that the intense air pressure created by the building's high speed elevators might buckle conventional shafts, engineers designed a solution using a drywall system fixed to the reinforced steel core. "
engineering.comENGINEERING.com


"Like many high-rises built in the 1960s, the Twin Towers were constructed with their weight distributed between a hollow steel core (containing services like elevators) and steel columns around the perimeter, maximizing open floor space. Many believe the older high-rise design, in which steel columns are often encased in concrete, is more fire resistant.

“A lot of people have told me, ‘You should have used more concrete in the structure,’” said Robertson. However, his chart plotting the strength of steel vs. concrete at various temperatures showed that at the incendiary levels that raged in the towers, the two materials become similarly weak."
Berkeley 04.17.2002 - World Trade Center remembered


"Yamasaki has switched from concrete, his favorite medium, to steel because of the sheer height of the towers, and instead of having the weight of the structure carried by the frame and the elevator core, the great steel columns of the exterior walls will support it."
Time Magazine article from 1964!! Art: Onward & Upward - TIME[/QUOTE]

 

[Christophera]

It appears quite obvious that my opposition has no independently verified evidence of the steel core columns whereas I do have such evidence supporting the existence of the concrete core.

Clearly, Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

So all they can do is try and change the subject.

clearly you are a fucking moron. (nice car, by the way).

not only do you lie and claim ronertson said something he never said, then you misrepresent oxford, but the two references you use contradict each other!! what a fucking idiot!!!!!

oxford says "steel and concrete" while you lie and claim robertson says "concrete".

Glad you like the Corolla. That one was $60, the one I drive now was free. You'll love it, its been attacked 3 times.

Can't figure why you post that video of Robertson where he says nothing about the structure. The compuer generated graphic of the steel core supplanting any real evidence, particularly from 9-11, only demonstrate you have none.

Hull = steel, core = concrete. Still no independently verifications of the concrete core. Just your usual spam misrepresentations and errors. Especially this one. It does not look into the core, just at the largest columns surrounding the core.

The rest earns the SPAM10 desperate agent award.

Here are are a number of posts that completely identify the exact misrepresentations and errors.

SPAM6
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1914220-post3527.html


FIZZ SPAM
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html


BERKLEY ERRORS
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1904734-post3480.html


TIME MAGAZINE ERRORS
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1904673-post3478.html


SPAM 4-POSTING UNKNOWN STRUCTURE CALLING IT WTC TWIN
http://www.usmessageboard.com/18978...//www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/

 

[DiveCon]

It appears quite obvious that my opposition has no independently verified evidence of the steel core columns whereas I do have such evidence supporting the existence of the concrete core.

Clearly, Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

So all they can do is try and change the subject.

clearly you are a fucking moron. (nice car, by the way).

not only do you lie and claim ronertson said something he never said, then you misrepresent oxford, but the two references you use contradict each other!! what a fucking idiot!!!!!

oxford says "steel and concrete" while you lie and claim robertson says "concrete".

Glad you like the Corolla. That one was $60, the one I drive now was free. You'll love it, its been attacked 3 times.

Can't figure why you post that video of Robertson where he says nothing about the structure. The compuer generated graphic of the steel core supplanting any real evidence, particularly from 9-11, only demonstrate you have none.

Hull = steel, core = concrete. Still no independently verifications of the concrete core. Just your usual spam misrepresentations and errors. Especially this one. It does not look into the core, just at the largest columns surrounding the core.

The rest earns the SPAM10 desperate agent award.

Here are are a number of posts that completely identify the exact misrepresentations and errors.

SPAM6
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1914220-post3527.html


FIZZ SPAM
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html


BERKLEY ERRORS
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1904734-post3480.html


TIME MAGAZINE ERRORS
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1904673-post3478.html


SPAM 4-POSTING UNKNOWN STRUCTURE CALLING IT WTC TWIN
http://www.usmessageboard.com/18978...//www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/

the only one spamming this board is YOU, dipshit

 

[Fizz]

Glad you like the Corolla. That one was $60, the one I drive now was free. You'll love it, its been attacked 3 times.

did your sister that supports you need to give you the 60 bucks for that too? now you have a free car but still no drivers license? wasnt it suspended when you refused to support your own children?

Can't figure why you post that video of Robertson where he says nothing about the structure. The compuer generated graphic of the steel core supplanting any real evidence, particularly from 9-11, only demonstrate you have none.

its along the same theory as "robertson must have demanded a correction if it was wrong" that you have. robertson doesnt say steel core but the documentary does. so therefore robertson must have said it. same thing with your silly newsweek article that was pulled off the internet because it was wrong. robertson didnt say concrete core. the reporter did. so if you are going to claim the reporter got the info from robertson than the same claim holds true for the documentary.

Hull = steel, core = concrete. Still no independently verifications of the concrete core. Just your usual spam misrepresentations and errors. Especially this one. It does not look into the core, just at the largest columns surrounding the core.

no. it uses the world trade center as an example of what a skyscraper is. it doesnt say it has a concrete core. it still contradicts your claim.

The rest earns the SPAM10 desperate agent award.

you still cant refute any of the pictures. you need to refute ALL of them in order to have a concrete core.

the picture above clearly shows blue sky THROUGH the core area on the right side of the pic.

the pic below clearly shows the steel columns of the core on 9/11.

this pic you can see through the steel core to the light coming in through the windows on the right side.

this picture you can see all the way through the core area. all steel. no concrete. spray on fireproofing already in place in the foreground. THERE IS NO CONCRETE CORE!!

the below pic shows the massive columns of the steel core. you claim they are "elevator guide rail supports"

as you can see by looking at the below pictures, elevator guide rails are bolted directly to a concrete core. there are no "elevator guide rail support" columns nevermind the need for them to be the massive steel columns shown above.

 

[Christophera]

Glad you like the Corolla. That one was $60, the one I drive now was free. You'll love it, its been attacked 3 times.

did your sister that supports you need to give you the 60 bucks for that too? now you have a free car but still no drivers license? wasnt it suspended when you refused to support your own children?

Can't figure why you post that video of Robertson where he says nothing about the structure. The compuer generated graphic of the steel core supplanting any real evidence, particularly from 9-11, only demonstrate you have none.

its along the same theory as "robertson must have demanded a correction if it was wrong" that you have. robertson doesnt say steel core but the documentary does. so therefore robertson must have said it. same thing with your silly newsweek article that was pulled off the internet because it was wrong. robertson didnt say concrete core. the reporter did. so if you are going to claim the reporter got the info from robertson than the same claim holds true for the documentary.

Hull = steel, core = concrete. Still no independently verifications of the concrete core. Just your usual spam misrepresentations and errors. Especially this one. It does not look into the core, just at the largest columns surrounding the core.

no. it uses the world trade center as an example of what a skyscraper is. it doesnt say it has a concrete core. it still contradicts your claim.

The rest earns the SPAM10 desperate agent award.

Here are are a number of posts that completely identify the exact misrepresentations and errors.

SPAM6
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1914220-post3527.html


FIZZ SPAM
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1860963-post3290.html


BERKLEY ERRORS
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1904734-post3480.html


TIME MAGAZINE ERRORS
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1904673-post3478.html


SPAM 4-POSTING UNKNOWN STRUCTURE CALLING IT WTC TWIN
http://www.usmessageboard.com/18978...//www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/

the only one spamming this board is YOU, dipshit

as you can see by looking at the below pictures, elevator guide rails are bolted directly to a concrete core. there are no "elevator guide rail support" columns nevermind the need for them to be the massive steel columns shown above.

Of course lawless government is what you support as well as the demise of the US Constitution so you've failed to recognize every violaion of law conducted that deprives Ameircans of the true plans for the Twin towers and all the legal actions I've filed trying to protect Americans.

WELFARE FRAUD CREATES CHILD SUPPORT
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802693-post2845.html

CITIZENS OF 9th CIRCUIT DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS, PETITION FOR ENBANC HEARING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802123-post2829.html

MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html

STOP PAYMENT ON CHECK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802771-post742.html

SUPREME COURT TRICKERY
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1826942-post3076.html

Of course elevator guide rails are bolted directly to a concrete core when it is small. The Twins had the largest concrete core ever made. The east concrete core wall of WTC 1 toppling into the empty core area.

Robertson identified a concrete core to Newsweek on September 13, 2001 and it is absolutely absurd to suggest that after 3,000 are killed in what was termed a collapse, the engineer of record would allow an error as massive as what you suggest to exist in a globally distributed magazine.

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

 

[DiveCon]

Robertson identified a concrete core to Newsweek on September 13, 2001 and it is absolutely absurd to suggest that after 3,000 are killed in what was termed a collapse, the engineer of record would allow an error as massive as what you suggest to exist in a globally distributed magazine.

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

and Robertson says that was wrong and he never said it

 

[Christophera]

Robertson identified a concrete core to Newsweek on September 13, 2001 and it is absolutely absurd to suggest that after 3,000 are killed in what was termed a collapse, the engineer of record would allow an error as massive as what you suggest to exist in a globally distributed magazine.

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

and Robertson says that was wrong and he never said it

That is nothing you lying sack of pee. I can lie too just to demonstrate how meaningless your unsupported text is, but there is some truth in it, that you lie.

George Bush told me you were an agent and that you yourself stole the plans as well as allthe photos of the concrete core at construction and would be lying about communicating about Robertson.





Robertson is verified by Domel who is verified by the Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992.[/b]

Nothing like that can be said about anything you present.

 

[DiveCon]

Robertson identified a concrete core to Newsweek on September 13, 2001 and it is absolutely absurd to suggest that after 3,000 are killed in what was termed a collapse, the engineer of record would allow an error as massive as what you suggest to exist in a globally distributed magazine.

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

and Robertson says that was wrong and he never said it

I can lie


<removed lies>

we KNOW you lie

 

[Christophera]

and Robertson says that was wrong and he never said it

I can lie


<removed lies>

we KNOW you lie

Everybody can. But you have been exposed.

This part is true.

lying about communicating about Robertson

You have never communicated with Leslie Robertson. Newsweek is correct and verified.

 

[DiveCon]

I can lie


<removed lies>

we KNOW you lie

Everybody can. But you have been exposed.

This part is true.

lying about communicating about Robertson

You have never communicated with Leslie Robertson. Newsweek is correct and verified.

you are the exposed liar and deadbeat
pay your child support you piece of shit

 

[Fizz]

Robertson identified a concrete core to Newsweek on September 13, 2001 and it is absolutely absurd to suggest that after 3,000 are killed in what was termed a collapse, the engineer of record would allow an error as massive as what you suggest to exist in a globally distributed magazine.

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

where is your proof? robertson isnt quoted. you claim he said it but the article is the words of the writer, not robertson. show proof he said there was a concrete core.

i think the "engineer of record" would be a little busy two days after one of his buildings collapsed. even if he did have time to read the article and even give a shit, what makes you think he DIDNT get the article corrected? the article is no longer available on newsweek's site and in a later article newsweek claims the core is STEEL.

so explain to us in detail how ALL the pictures of the world trade center core were stolen again....

we are still waiting to hear how that is even possible.

 

[Fizz]

[
Of course lawless government is what you support as well as the demise of the US Constitution so you've failed to recognize every violaion of law conducted that deprives Ameircans of the true plans for the Twin towers and all the legal actions I've filed trying to protect Americans.

the constitution works just fine, thanks. it punishes deadbeat fathers like you that abandon their children. it keeps you from having the privilege of driving on the roads that my tax dollars paid for. when you file crazy lawsuits for ridiculous reasons it throws them out. you arent protecting anyone. you cant even support yourself!! your sister supports you!! stop tying up the legal system with your mental delusions so the rest of us sane americans dont need to pay for your wild hoaxes.

robertson's firm has the plans for the WTC and shares them with people that need them, such as the NIST. your entire guiliani rant is not only untrue but its irrelevant.

your delusions that you are "protecting americans" are a sign that you are seriously mentally ill.

the last person in the world i would want protecting me of my family is YOU!!

 

[Christophera]

[
Of course lawless government is what you support as well as the demise of the US Constitution so you've failed to recognize every violaion of law conducted that deprives Ameircans of the true plans for the Twin towers and all the legal actions I've filed trying to protect Americans.

the constitution works just fine, thanks. it punishes deadbeat fathers like you

Not only do you refuse to recognize violations of law concealing the secret methods of mass murder, you think the Consitution has something to do with the deprivations of right Ive' been subjected to.

WELFARE FRAUD CREATES CHILD SUPPORT
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802693-post2845.html

CITIZENS OF 9th CIRCUIT DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS, PETITION FOR ENBANC HEARING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802123-post2829.html

MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html

STOP PAYMENT ON CHECK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802771-post742.html

SUPREME COURT TRICKERY
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1826942-post3076.html

 

[Fizz]

[
Of course lawless government is what you support as well as the demise of the US Constitution so you've failed to recognize every violaion of law conducted that deprives Ameircans of the true plans for the Twin towers and all the legal actions I've filed trying to protect Americans.

the constitution works just fine, thanks. it punishes deadbeat fathers like you

Not only do you refuse to recognize violations of law concealing the secret methods of mass murder, you think the Consitution has something to do with the deprivations of right Ive' been subjected to.

WELFARE FRAUD CREATES CHILD SUPPORT
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802693-post2845.html

CITIZENS OF 9th CIRCUIT DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS, PETITION FOR ENBANC HEARING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802123-post2829.html

MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html

STOP PAYMENT ON CHECK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802771-post742.html

SUPREME COURT TRICKERY
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1826942-post3076.html

you moron. you werent deprived of any rights. you received due process and were found to be WRONG.

just like on this thread. you are wrong. you've been proven wrong. you're just too stupid to realize it.

 

[Christophera]

Wrong.

Anyone that cares about Consitutional right can see that the failure to appear on subpoena is a deprivation of right, agent.

But you only pretend to care about Consitutional rights.

The concrete core is obvious.

 

[Fizz]

Wrong.

Anyone that cares about Consitutional right can see that the failure to appear on subpoena is a deprivation of right, agent.

But you only pretend to care about Consitutional rights.

The concrete core is obvious.

yeah deadbeat. they should have shown up and stated in front of the court they dont hafve the records.

THAT WAY YOU COULD HAVE MADE AMERICANS THAT ACTUALLY PAY TAXES (this doesnt include you) WASTE EVEN MORE MONEY ON YOUR STUPID FUCKING LAWSUITS.

get a fucking job you lazy, deadbeat, lowlife.

 

[Christophera]

Wrong.

Anyone that cares about Consitutional right can see that the failure to appear on subpoena is a deprivation of right, agent.

But you only pretend to care about Consitutional rights.

The concrete core is obvious.

yeah deadbeat. they should have shown up and stated in front of the court they dont hafve the records.

THAT WAY YOU COULD HAVE MADE AMERICANS THAT ACTUALLY PAY TAXES (this doesnt include you) WASTE EVEN MORE MONEY ON YOUR STUPID FUCKING LAWSUITS.

get a fucking job you lazy, deadbeat, lowlife.

The sheriffs department implicates the county counsel in a TITLE 42, §1983 "interfering with the appearance of the witness." You totally fail to observe violations of law, even one enabling the FEMA deception

FAILURE TO APPEAR ON SUBPOENA
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1962601-post3635.html

WELFARE FRAUD CREATES CHILD SUPPORT
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802693-post2845.html

CITIZENS OF 9th CIRCUIT DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS, PETITION FOR ENBANC HEARING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802123-post2829.html

MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html

STOP PAYMENT ON CHECK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802771-post742.html

SUPREME COURT TRICKERY
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1826942-post3076.html

 

[Fizz]

Wrong.

Anyone that cares about Consitutional right can see that the failure to appear on subpoena is a deprivation of right, agent.

But you only pretend to care about Consitutional rights.

The concrete core is obvious.

yeah deadbeat. they should have shown up and stated in front of the court they dont hafve the records.

THAT WAY YOU COULD HAVE MADE AMERICANS THAT ACTUALLY PAY TAXES (this doesnt include you) WASTE EVEN MORE MONEY ON YOUR STUPID FUCKING LAWSUITS.

get a fucking job you lazy, deadbeat, lowlife.

The sheriffs department implicates the county counsel in a TITLE 42, §1983 "interfering with the appearance of the witness." You totally fail to observe violations of law, even one enabling the FEMA deception

FAILURE TO APPEAR ON SUBPOENA
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1962601-post3635.html

WELFARE FRAUD CREATES CHILD SUPPORT
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802693-post2845.html

CITIZENS OF 9th CIRCUIT DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS, PETITION FOR ENBANC HEARING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802123-post2829.html

MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html

STOP PAYMENT ON CHECK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802771-post742.html

SUPREME COURT TRICKERY
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1826942-post3076.html

i love how you quote yourself as proof of what you say. thats just about the most idiotic thing i have ever seen.

you abandoned your kids. you never paid child support. you owe $30,000. a stop payment on a check is irrelevant. arrest records from the 1870s is irrelevant. the fact that your brain is capable of generating enough electricity to allow your lungs to inflate which completely wastes our perfectly good oxygen is simply astounding.

 

[Fizz]

motion to squash denied. sentenced to 195 days in jail.

 

[KissMy]

Here are the actual North Tower blueprint plans floor by floor in original detail. There was NO concrete core in the plans.

No concrete core in any construction photo.

If Christophera is hell bent in conspiracy then focus on why & how the buildings were allowed to be hit.

Also the "evidence" that Christophera relies on is full of obvious errors & mis-statements. Take for instance: NCSEA/SEERP -bottom of page 5- "The collapse of the structures, along with the collateral damage, produced a pile of debris weighing more than two billion pounds, over 5,000 fatalities and thousands of injured civilians and rescue workers." The real death toll was 2749 not over 5000. The truthers say the toll is even less because many bodies are missing. They also say empty planes hit the buildings.

Stick to hard core facts & not mis-statements & erroneous assessments.