FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Fizz]

this is just too fucking funny not to share with everyone.....

perhaps the line stating Chris has "no relevant information to support his claim" shows a pattern of making unsubstantiated claims.

and this response to his complaint shows he filed his complaint 120 YEARS too late!!

(from irresponsible )

 

[Christophera]

motion to squash denied. sentenced to 195 days in jail.

I certainly would not expect an agent working to destroy the Constitution by ignoring rights guaranteed under it to recognize a deprivation of right.

Line 17, - 19 are errors. State law demands errors be stricken from the record. The clerk would not stamp the motion to strike "filed" only "recieved". No order of the court exists on the motion to quash based on estoppel. The judge is lying in writing and has been doing so on the bench and altering court reporters transcripts, all proven.
FAILURE TO APPEAR ON SUBPOENA
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1962601-post3635.html
WELFARE FRAUD CREATES CHILD SUPPORT
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802693-post2845.html
CITIZENS OF 9th CIRCUIT DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS, PETITION FOR ENBANC HEARING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802123-post2829.html
MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html
STOP PAYMENT ON CHECK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802771-post742.html
SUPREME COURT TRICKERY
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1826942-post3076.html

An motion for evidenciary hearing was also only stamped "recieved". A violation of due process and equal protection of law by a court and a clerk.

Of course the perpetrators who would not want agents recognizing relatively minor deprivations of right by courts upon citizens, would not want agents noticing the enablement of deception keeping methods of mass murder secret.

The Twins had a concrete tubular core. Just because you have no evidence, stop trying to change the subject moron.

 

[Fizz]

your rights werent deprived. you had your day in court. you were found guilty and sentenced to 195 days in jail. the constitution worked perfectly.

 

[DiveCon]

your rights werent deprived. you had your day in court. you were found guilty and sentenced to 195 days in jail. the constitution worked perfectly.

oh man, they should have held him longer
he is certifiably INSANE

 

[Christophera]

your rights werent deprived. you had your day in court. you were found guilty and sentenced to 195 days in jail. the constitution worked perfectly.

oh man, they should have held him longer
he is certifiably INSANE

The sentence was suspended. The point is that the charge cannot be Consitutional because of estoppel and the failure to appear on subpoena by the county.

Which is but one of many deprivations of right.

MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html

Conformed face page of motion to quash, estoppel, never heard that the commissioner erroneously declared denied.

1. The following pleading is in support of the concurently filed MOTON TO QUASH PROCEEDINGS and addresses the consideratons of the equitable estoppel balencing process similar to that used with equitable estoppel as shown with, County of Orange v. Carl D. supra, 76 CA4th at 438, 90 CR2d at 447(See page 3 of MOTION TO QUASH)

2. This pleading applies the inverse balencing to County of Orange v. Carl D. in that the statement "justify any effect upon public interest" could be interpreted in this case as a negative public interest to consider respondent for charges of contempt.

3. Respondent is a proponent for an experimental medical treatment that can reduce public expenditures related to homelessness drugs, alcohol and related medical costs. By observing "justice and right to the individual", the "public interest" of this experimental treatment would have already been manifested by petitioners compliance with law and appearance under subpoena September 8, 1998 (EXHIBIT NINETEEN) by now, or, also by complying further with CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY code § 1370.4. EXHIBIT FORTY shows the director of the mental health department began complying with law by making a request to the California state Mental Health Department to administer experimental treatment respondent propose(d)s. The public and respondent have been deprived of this health care since then.

4. Respondent also intended to use the medical information commercially, an element of equitable estoppel lodged inside the major promissory estoppel relating to the medical aspects. EXHIBIT FORTY-TWO shows the respondent attempting to gain the response of the State Department of mental health to the County of Mental Health by a Freedom Of Information Act Request wherein the petitioner did not respond. Granting respondents motion will have some positive effect on public interest.

5. The fact that respondent has sought the medical information, compliance to develop a treatment, perhaps more appropriate than those existing for alcohol and drug recovery, sex offenders, and other disorders, or acting in a way inherently benefiting public interests (SEE EXHIBIT FORTY) and that this "public interest" aspect alone perhaps constitutes "outweighing" the "frustration" (a debt that would have been paid if the petitioner had followed laws) in the "equitable estoppel balancing process".
PRAYER
6. Respondent prays for consideration of the potential positive public interests of the granting of his motion to quash the proceedings or OSC of contempt.

Date;

pro per respondent, Christopher A. Brown,

Of course deprivations of Constitutional right will not be noticed just as the violation of law that enabled the deception conducted by guliani and a NYS superior court judge.

Agents with no evidence are always trying to change the subject from the core of the towers which was CONCRETE. The east concrete wall of WTC 1 toppling into the empty core area.

 

[Fizz]

your rights werent deprived. you had your day in court. you were found guilty and sentenced to 195 days in jail. the constitution worked perfectly.

oh man, they should have held him longer
he is certifiably INSANE

The sentence was suspended. The point is that the charge cannot be Consitutional because of estoppel and the failure to appear on subpoena by the county.

the sentence being suspended doesnt change the fact you were sentenced to 195 days in jail. it just means you wont serve the time until you fuck up and continue not to pay your child support. and that has already happened so its just a matter of time now until you are in jail.

the charge can be constitutional even if someone doesnt appear. it happens all the time with crazy people such as yourself. did you think you could murder somebody and then subpoena president obama and if he doesnt show up you are found innocent?

it doesnt work that way.

the sheriffs department and the records from the 1800s have no bearing on why you failed to pay the child support you were ordered to pay by the courts. the judge didnt buy your claim that it was relevant and neither would any other sane person. you were found guilty. it was a perfectly legal and constitutional proceeding. of course you have the right to appeal and the courts have the right to review and reject them. thats the way the system works.

personally, i feel you should be committed because you are a danger to the public.

 

[DiveCon]

oh man, they should have held him longer
he is certifiably INSANE

The sentence was suspended. The point is that the charge cannot be Consitutional because of estoppel and the failure to appear on subpoena by the county.

the sentence being suspended doesnt change the fact you were sentenced to 195 days in jail. it just means you wont serve the time until you fuck up and continue not to pay your child support. and that has already happened so its just a matter of time now until you are in jail.

the charge can be constitutional even if someone doesnt appear. it happens all the time with crazy people such as yourself. did you think you could murder somebody and then subpoena president obama and if he doesnt show up you are found innocent?

it doesnt work that way.

the sheriffs department and the records from the 1800s have no bearing on why you failed to pay the child support you were ordered to pay by the courts. the judge didnt buy your claim that it was relevant and neither would any other sane person. you were found guilty. it was a perfectly legal and constitutional proceeding. of course you have the right to appeal and the courts have the right to review and reject them. thats the way the system works.

personally, i feel you should be committed because you are a danger to the public.

uh ha

 

[Christophera]

The sentence was suspended. The point is that the charge cannot be Consitutional because of estoppel and the failure to appear on subpoena by the county.

the sentence being suspended doesnt change the fact you were sentenced to 195 days in jail.

Of course due process and equal protection of law mean nothing to you. The county the failed to appear on subpoena
is estopped from using the court to collect. But the court is corrupt. It cannot legally hear the counties case against me. It failed to appear because appearance with the subpoenaed documents would have proven that over 1,000 case files are absent from the record and that it should never have had its demurrer granted by the corrupt judge that was inititally assigned.

MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html

But all this is evasion and your efforts to change the subject because you have no evidence.

Clearly, all of the evidence I present is independently verified. Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

The steel core columns have no independently verified evidence.

 

[Fizz]

Of course due process and equal protection of law mean nothing to you. The county the failed to appear on subpoena
is estopped from using the court to collect. But the court is corrupt. It cannot legally hear the counties case against me. It failed to appear because appearance with the subpoenaed documents would have proven that over 1,000 case files are absent from the record and that it should never have had its demurrer granted by the corrupt judge that was inititally assigned.

MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html

But all this is evasion and your efforts to change the subject because you have no evidence.

hey jackass, evidence presented in a case needs to be RELEVANT. there is no fucking way in the world that records from 1876 are relevant to your FAILURE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT case.

all this is showing how mentally ill you are and your claims of a concrete core is a complete hoax and the claims of a delusional person. you have no evidence. what you claim is evidence doesnt hold up to scrutiny. there a thousands of pictures of the steel core. you dont have a single picture of the concrete core.

end of story. YOU GOT NOTHING!!

 

[Christophera]

Of course due process and equal protection of law mean nothing to you. The county the failed to appear on subpoena
is estopped from using the court to collect. But the court is corrupt. It cannot legally hear the counties case against me. It failed to appear because appearance with the subpoenaed documents would have proven that over 1,000 case files are absent from the record and that it should never have had its demurrer granted by the corrupt judge that was inititally assigned.

MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html

But all this is evasion and your efforts to change the subject because you have no evidence.

hey jackass, evidence presented in a case needs to be RELEVANT. there is no fucking way in the world that records from 1876 are relevant to your FAILURE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT case.

If I subpoena records, and they fail to appear, they are estopped from any legal action, period. Goverment has made citizens a promise to follow laws. Ther perps will not want you to acknowledge that. Promisory estoppel prevents any civil legal action against citizens when the deprival or right, failure to follow law effects the issue.

You refuse to recognize violation of law by guiliani and courts which enables the secret methods of mass murder, so I hardly expect you to recognize deprivations of a citizens rights to equal protection of law.

All this change of subject is because you have no independently verified evidence for steel core columns.

I prove the concrete core with Newsweek and Robertsons September 13, 2001 article and images from 9-11, which you have none showing the supposed steel core columns in the core area.

Rebar surrounding the core.

 

[DiveCon]

Of course due process and equal protection of law mean nothing to you. The county the failed to appear on subpoena
is estopped from using the court to collect. But the court is corrupt. It cannot legally hear the counties case against me. It failed to appear because appearance with the subpoenaed documents would have proven that over 1,000 case files are absent from the record and that it should never have had its demurrer granted by the corrupt judge that was inititally assigned.

MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html

But all this is evasion and your efforts to change the subject because you have no evidence.

hey jackass, evidence presented in a case needs to be RELEVANT. there is no fucking way in the world that records from 1876 are relevant to your FAILURE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT case.

If I subpoena records, and they fail to appear, they are estopped from any legal action, period. Goverment has made citizens a promise to follow laws. Ther perps will not want you to acknowledge that. Promisory estoppel prevents any civil legal action against citizens when the deprival or right, failure to follow law effects the issue.

You refuse to recognize violation of law by guiliani and courts which enables the secret methods of mass murder, so I hardly expect you to recognize deprivations of a citizens rights to equal protection of law.

All this change of subject is because you have no independently verified evidence for steel core columns.

I prove the concrete core with Newsweek and Robertsons September 13, 2001 article and images from 9-11, which you have none showing the supposed steel core columns in the core area.

Rebar surrounding the core.

wrong, dipshit, if you subpoena something that doesnt exist you get NOTHING

 

[Fizz]

Of course due process and equal protection of law mean nothing to you. The county the failed to appear on subpoena
is estopped from using the court to collect. But the court is corrupt. It cannot legally hear the counties case against me. It failed to appear because appearance with the subpoenaed documents would have proven that over 1,000 case files are absent from the record and that it should never have had its demurrer granted by the corrupt judge that was inititally assigned.

MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html

But all this is evasion and your efforts to change the subject because you have no evidence.

hey jackass, evidence presented in a case needs to be RELEVANT. there is no fucking way in the world that records from 1876 are relevant to your FAILURE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT case.

If I subpoena records, and they fail to appear, they are estopped from any legal action, period. Goverment has made citizens a promise to follow laws. Ther perps will not want you to acknowledge that. Promisory estoppel prevents any civil legal action against citizens when the deprival or right, failure to follow law effects the issue.

You refuse to recognize violation of law by guiliani and courts which enables the secret methods of mass murder, so I hardly expect you to recognize deprivations of a citizens rights to equal protection of law.

All this change of subject is because you have no independently verified evidence for steel core columns.

I prove the concrete core with Newsweek and Robertsons September 13, 2001 article and images from 9-11, which you have none showing the supposed steel core columns in the core area.

Rebar surrounding the core.

California Evidence Code Section 350 No evidence is admissible except relevant evidence.

your evidence wasnt relevant. your subpoena isnt valid. GUILTY!!!

 

[Christophera]

hey jackass, evidence presented in a case needs to be RELEVANT. there is no fucking way in the world that records from 1876 are relevant to your FAILURE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT case.

If I subpoena records, and they fail to appear, they are estopped from any legal action, period. Goverment has made citizens a promise to follow laws. Ther perps will not want you to acknowledge that. Promisory estoppel prevents any civil legal action against citizens when the deprival or right, failure to follow law effects the issue.

You refuse to recognize violation of law by guiliani and courts which enables the secret methods of mass murder, so I hardly expect you to recognize deprivations of a citizens rights to equal protection of law.

All this change of subject is because you have no independently verified evidence for steel core columns.

I prove the concrete core with Newsweek and Robertsons September 13, 2001 article and images from 9-11, which you have none showing the supposed steel core columns in the core area.

Rebar surrounding the core.

California Evidence Code Section 350 No evidence is admissible except relevant evidence.

your evidence wasnt relevant. your subpoena isnt valid. GUILTY!!!

You must be stupid to think that a subpoena depends on evidence. All it needs is an affidavit and a proof of service from an active court case.

Of course the perps would want you to misrepresent whatever it takes to assist in the demise of the Constitution and keeping the methods of mass murder secret.

The concrete core of the towers is proven by independently verified evidence.

Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation published in 1992

Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6

 

[Fizz]

You must be stupid to think that a subpoena depends on evidence. All it needs is an affidavit and a proof of service from an active court case.

Of course the perps would want you to misrepresent whatever it takes to assist in the demise of the Constitution and keeping the methods of mass murder secret.

The concrete core of the towers is proven by independently verified evidence.

Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation published in 1992

Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6

your evidence was completely irrelevant. serving a subpoena for inadmissable evidence is just plain stupid. it didnt work. you are a moron.

there is no concrete core. it isnt independently verified. you claim robertson said something he didnt. you claim oxford says something it doesnt.

YOU GOT NOTHING!!

 

[Christophera]

You must be stupid to think that a subpoena depends on evidence. All it needs is an affidavit and a proof of service from an active court case.

Of course the perps would want you to misrepresent whatever it takes to assist in the demise of the Constitution and keeping the methods of mass murder secret.

The concrete core of the towers is proven by independently verified evidence.

Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation published in 1992

Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6

your evidence was completely irrelevant. serving a subpoena for inadmissable evidence is just plain stupid. it didnt work. you are a moron.

there is no concrete core. it isnt independently verified. you claim robertson said something he didnt. you claim oxford says something it doesnt.

YOU GOT NOTHING!!

In reality, the reverse of what agents say is true.

Meaning any subpoena properly filed and served MUST be honored.

Meaning that Newsweek took the correct information from Robertson and published it on September (It is not reasonable to suggest that when 3,000 are murdered, Newsweek would NOT make sure the information was good or that the engineering firm designing the building that collapsed would NOT demand, and recieve a correction)

Meaning YOU GOT NOTHING and have posted nothing.

The WTC 2 concrete core. All of the exterior steel framework is gone. No steel protrudes from the core.

 

[DiveCon]

You must be stupid to think that a subpoena depends on evidence. All it needs is an affidavit and a proof of service from an active court case.

Of course the perps would want you to misrepresent whatever it takes to assist in the demise of the Constitution and keeping the methods of mass murder secret.

The concrete core of the towers is proven by independently verified evidence.

Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation published in 1992

Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6

your evidence was completely irrelevant. serving a subpoena for inadmissable evidence is just plain stupid. it didnt work. you are a moron.

there is no concrete core. it isnt independently verified. you claim robertson said something he didnt. you claim oxford says something it doesnt.

YOU GOT NOTHING!!

In reality, the reverse of what agents say is true.

Meaning any subpoena properly filed and served MUST be honored.

Meaning that Newsweek took the correct information from Robertson and published it on September (It is not reasonable to suggest that when 3,000 are murdered, Newsweek would NOT make sure the information was good or that the engineering firm designing the building that collapsed would NOT demand, and recieve a correction)

Meaning YOU GOT NOTHING and have posted nothing.

The WTC 2 concrete core. All of the exterior steel framework is gone. No steel protrudes from the core.

hey dipshit, you can subpoena Marie Antoinette, and if she doesnt show up you dont win by default because shes DEAD you dumbfuck

 

[Christophera]

your evidence was completely irrelevant. serving a subpoena for inadmissable evidence is just plain stupid. it didnt work. you are a moron.

there is no concrete core. it isnt independently verified. you claim robertson said something he didnt. you claim oxford says something it doesnt.

YOU GOT NOTHING!!

In reality, the reverse of what agents say is true.

Meaning any subpoena properly filed and served MUST be honored.

Meaning that Newsweek took the correct information from Robertson and published it on September (It is not reasonable to suggest that when 3,000 are murdered, Newsweek would NOT make sure the information was good or that the engineering firm designing the building that collapsed would NOT demand, and recieve a correction)

Meaning YOU GOT NOTHING and have posted nothing.

The WTC 2 concrete core. All of the exterior steel framework is gone. No steel protrudes from the core.

hey dipshit, you can subpoena Marie Antoinette, and if she doesnt show up you dont win by default because shes DEAD you dumbfuck

But I subpoenaed the custodian of records at the Santa Barbara county jail and the county counsel interfered with the appearance of the witness and told the witness to lie in the letter admitting to failure to appear.

This declaration states that the subpoenaed documents were in the counties possesion one year before.

Not Marie Antoinette.

And the fact you have no evidence is really obvious.

 

[DiveCon]

In reality, the reverse of what agents say is true.

Meaning any subpoena properly filed and served MUST be honored.

Meaning that Newsweek took the correct information from Robertson and published it on September (It is not reasonable to suggest that when 3,000 are murdered, Newsweek would NOT make sure the information was good or that the engineering firm designing the building that collapsed would NOT demand, and recieve a correction)

Meaning YOU GOT NOTHING and have posted nothing.

The WTC 2 concrete core. All of the exterior steel framework is gone. No steel protrudes from the core.

hey dipshit, you can subpoena Marie Antoinette, and if she doesnt show up you dont win by default because shes DEAD you dumbfuck

But I subpoenaed the custodian of records at the Santa Barbara county jail and the county counsel interfered with the appearance of the witness and told the witness to lie in the letter admitting to failure to appear.

This declaration states that the subpoenaed documents were in the counties possesion one year before.

Not Marie Antoinette.

And the fact you have no evidence is really obvious.

the county says those records do not exist
and, what the fuck would those records have to do with you failing to pay your child support
since they were not relevant it didnt matter

 

[Fizz]

But I subpoenaed the custodian of records at the Santa Barbara county jail and the county counsel interfered with the appearance of the witness and told the witness to lie in the letter admitting to failure to appear.

This declaration states that the subpoenaed documents were in the counties possesion one year before.

but.....

but.....

but....

you are full of excuses. nothing but excuses.

the fact is your evidence from 1876 wasnt relevant to your child support case. only relevant evidence is admissible by law. it doesnt matter if they showed in court or not as the evidence wouldnt have been admissible. its irrelevant.

 

[Christophera]

Clearly, if you must fail to read and to recognize Consitutional rights and facts, it is because you have no evidence of the steel core columns. The Twin towers had a steel reinforced cast concrete core.

And all of the independently verified evidence shows this.

How does it feel to be exposed lying to support secret methods of mass murder?