gslack
Senior Member
- Mar 26, 2010
- 4,527
- 356
- 48
I can't actually figure out what you are trying to say. As an agent trying to conceal the methods of mass murder, you don't have to make sense, just pretending you do is enough to confuse things for those too fearful to stand directly for defense of the Constitution by recognizing the violations of laws made under it. Those violations of law happen to serve your side of this bs discussion so of course you won't acknowledge it. You have no evidence.
The concrete core has independently verified evidence.
Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
Oh going to play dumb now huh.... Okay go ahead and do that... But understand this Mr. Wannabe huckster, every time you pull this BS its like a big neon finger with the word Idiot written over it pointing straight at you....
You sat there and said one thing, then denied saying that, and when it was shown here in your own words, you pretend I am not making sense.... Seriously, if you wanted to paint yourself a bigger fool I can't imagine how you could do it after that....
Why not debate your own words some more? Show us your brilliance Mr. Wizard.....