You just said people should be forced to accept your protectionThank you for affirming my assertion that you have a pathological need to control other people1. Yes, I believe his decision was irrational. I stand by that call. As you say, he was likely to fail and only be badly hurt. Does that sound rational?
2. It was not about his danger to the drivers. As a member of our society he has the right to the protection of society.
And what if he doesn't want that protection?
You just force him to accept it?
Damn straight.
Thank you for demonstrating that you are incapable of reasonable debate.
So what is that exactly if not control?
You just equated wanting society having ANY level of control over itself, with having a personal, pathological need to control other people.
That is utterly absurd.
I'm not trying to tell you what gender pro nouns to use when discussing cross dressers.
I'm supporting the idea of not just watching as people kill themselves, while doing vast harm to the society we live in.