Fifteen Nails In The Liberal Coffin

[PoliticalChic]

NO LINKS (There is a reason for that)

Every one I post has a link.

Why won't you debate the other people's points you post?

Because Propaganda doesnt work that way. She asserts that she is correct and thats why she is. Facts be dammed.

Her cut and paste sources for this quagmire or misinformation are a long list of conservative bloggers and commentators. She is attempting to present opinions and talking points from the far right as factual academic data. Bloggers are not scholars and people who make a living writing partisan commentaries by nature and job description do not produce objective articles and essays. They produce political spin. That is what they do.

By declining to offer any dispute to any....any of them.....you inadvertently admit to exactly what they state.

That, plus the fact that you are well known as a liar.

 

[westwall]

The is that Liberal claim that, somehow, the other side is anti-science, anit-education, or some variation that paints us as 'stooopid.'

But mathematics is the language of science...and that element of mathematics known as statistics, skewers so very many Liberal policies, beliefs, and most closely held views.

The following, a series of talking-point defeats for Liberals....15 of 'em

Let's start:

As one function of the Progressive-Islamist Alliance, one can always expect Leftists to be the first to jump up to support Islamists, no matter what the outrage.
So....they'll hate this stat:

1) "....objective facts, logic and reason must yield to multiculturalist make-believe, “progressive” propaganda and political correctness run amok. Faithful Muslims want to kill you, and faithless progressives seem all too happy to help them along."
Matt Barber - Myth of the ‘Moderate Muslim’

“When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them.”
– The Quran, Surah 9:5

“Muslims account for only about 1 percent of the U.S. population but account for about half of terrorist attacks since 9/11. That means Muslims in the United States are about 5,000 percent more likely to commit terrorist attacks than non-Muslims.” -- Mark Krikorian




Leftists live on the myth that America is racist, and only unrestricted big government can save poor, put-upon minorities.
This is gonna hurt:

2) “... in 1958 a mere 4 percent of Americans approved of interracial marriage. By 2013, that number had grown to 87 percent. In 2012 these once-taboo unions hit an all-time high. Ku Klux Klan membership has shrunk drastically from millions a century ago to fewer than 5,000 today. The Black Panthers are essentially extinct. While plenty of other hate groups have attempted to fill the void, they have always operated on the margins of society. Black politicians are now common—President Obama’s percentage of the white vote was almost perfectly in line with that received by other recent Democrats, all of whom were white.

Granted, these statistics offer but a snapshot of American society, but the more one looks, the more a trend emerges. America is a lot of things; racist isn’t one of them.” -- Greg Jones




The 'liar of the year' authorized the eponymous "ObamaCare," proving, daily, to be a fraud:

3) “The harsh reality awaiting these low-income Americans is undeniable: according to 2013 data from a 2014 Merritt Hawkins study, 55% of doctors already refuse new Medicaid patients. According to the HSC Health Tracking Physician Survey, 2008, the percentage of doctors that refuse new Medicaid patients dwarf by about 8 to 10 times the percentage that refuses new private insurance patients.

Such ‘insurance’ from Obamacare not only fails to provide access to doctors, but research in the top medical journals such as Cancer, American Journal of Cardiology, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation and Annals of Surgery, show that Medicaid beneficiaries suffer worse outcomes than similar patients with private insurance ... all at an added cost of another $800 billion by CBO estimates to taxpayers after the decade.

It is not hyperbole to call Medicaid a disgrace at its annual cost of about $450 billion, and expanding it rather than helping poor people buy private insurance is simply inexplicable.” -- Scott Atlas
15 Stats That Destroy Liberal Narratives


That's just three.
More to come.

Please stop calling them liberals. They're not. They are progressives. Totally different breed of cat.

 

[Camp]

NO LINKS (There is a reason for that)

Every one I post has a link.

Why won't you debate the other people's points you post?

Because Propaganda doesnt work that way. She asserts that she is correct and thats why she is. Facts be dammed.

Her cut and paste sources for this quagmire or misinformation are a long list of conservative bloggers and commentators. She is attempting to present opinions and talking points from the far right as factual academic data. Bloggers are not scholars and people who make a living writing partisan commentaries by nature and job description do not produce objective articles and essays. They produce political spin. That is what they do.

By declining to offer any dispute to any....any of them.....you inadvertently admit to exactly what they state.

That, plus the fact that you are well known as a liar.

The whole post disputed the validity of your concept you dingbat. It is discredited by virtue of the fact that you are using subjective articles and sources. Even the people who wrote them would admit to that. You can not take a string of subjective opinions and turn them into an objective conclusion you dope. Nothing you are presenting is fact.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The is that Liberal claim that, somehow, the other side is anti-science, anit-education, or some variation that paints us as 'stooopid.'

But mathematics is the language of science...and that element of mathematics known as statistics, skewers so very many Liberal policies, beliefs, and most closely held views.

The following, a series of talking-point defeats for Liberals....15 of 'em

Let's start:

As one function of the Progressive-Islamist Alliance, one can always expect Leftists to be the first to jump up to support Islamists, no matter what the outrage.
So....they'll hate this stat:

1) "....objective facts, logic and reason must yield to multiculturalist make-believe, “progressive” propaganda and political correctness run amok. Faithful Muslims want to kill you, and faithless progressives seem all too happy to help them along."
Matt Barber - Myth of the ‘Moderate Muslim’

“When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them.”
– The Quran, Surah 9:5

“Muslims account for only about 1 percent of the U.S. population but account for about half of terrorist attacks since 9/11. That means Muslims in the United States are about 5,000 percent more likely to commit terrorist attacks than non-Muslims.” -- Mark Krikorian




Leftists live on the myth that America is racist, and only unrestricted big government can save poor, put-upon minorities.
This is gonna hurt:

2) “... in 1958 a mere 4 percent of Americans approved of interracial marriage. By 2013, that number had grown to 87 percent. In 2012 these once-taboo unions hit an all-time high. Ku Klux Klan membership has shrunk drastically from millions a century ago to fewer than 5,000 today. The Black Panthers are essentially extinct. While plenty of other hate groups have attempted to fill the void, they have always operated on the margins of society. Black politicians are now common—President Obama’s percentage of the white vote was almost perfectly in line with that received by other recent Democrats, all of whom were white.

Granted, these statistics offer but a snapshot of American society, but the more one looks, the more a trend emerges. America is a lot of things; racist isn’t one of them.” -- Greg Jones




The 'liar of the year' authorized the eponymous "ObamaCare," proving, daily, to be a fraud:

3) “The harsh reality awaiting these low-income Americans is undeniable: according to 2013 data from a 2014 Merritt Hawkins study, 55% of doctors already refuse new Medicaid patients. According to the HSC Health Tracking Physician Survey, 2008, the percentage of doctors that refuse new Medicaid patients dwarf by about 8 to 10 times the percentage that refuses new private insurance patients.

Such ‘insurance’ from Obamacare not only fails to provide access to doctors, but research in the top medical journals such as Cancer, American Journal of Cardiology, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation and Annals of Surgery, show that Medicaid beneficiaries suffer worse outcomes than similar patients with private insurance ... all at an added cost of another $800 billion by CBO estimates to taxpayers after the decade.

It is not hyperbole to call Medicaid a disgrace at its annual cost of about $450 billion, and expanding it rather than helping poor people buy private insurance is simply inexplicable.” -- Scott Atlas
15 Stats That Destroy Liberal Narratives


That's just three.
More to come.

Please stop calling them liberals. They're not. They are progressives. Totally different breed of cat.

1. On the one hand, there is this..
"When CNN’s Anderson Cooper asked Clinton to clarify at the beginning of the debate whether she considers herself a “progressive or a moderate,” the former secretary of state said: “I’m a progressive. I’m a progressive who likes to get things done.”

Added Clinton: “I don’t take a back seat to anyone when it comes to progressive experience and progressive commitment.”
Hillary Clinton Reassures Liberal Base During Debate: ‘I’m A Progressive’



2. Then, there is this...
I'm a history buff, and the fact is that the Socialist Party changed its name to 'Liberal' to co-opt the fine reputation that classical liberals....those to whom, I believe, you refer....assumed.

When folks caught on to the scam, they changed to Progressive...
"Hillary Clinton says she doesn't really like the descriptive word "liberal," preferring to be characterized as a "progressive."

"You know, (liberal) is a word that originally meant that you were for freedom … that you were willing to stand against big power and on behalf of the individual," she said at the CNN/YouTube debate. "Unfortunately, in the last 30, 40 years, it has been turned up on its head, and it's been made to seem as though it is a word that describes big government, totally contrary to what its meaning was in the 19th and early 20th century." She continued: "I prefer the word 'progressive,' which has a real American meaning, going back to the progressive era at the beginning of the 20th century.I consider myself a modern progressive."
What Is a Progressive? by Joseph Farah on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent


Therefore, I find 'Liberal' and Progressive fit in this way: a distinction without a difference.
Today, the terms are synonyms.


But...I will accede to your request....when I mean classical liberal, e.g., our Founders.....I'll refer to 'classical liberals.'

 

[PoliticalChic]

Every one I post has a link.

Why won't you debate the other people's points you post?

Because Propaganda doesnt work that way. She asserts that she is correct and thats why she is. Facts be dammed.

Her cut and paste sources for this quagmire or misinformation are a long list of conservative bloggers and commentators. She is attempting to present opinions and talking points from the far right as factual academic data. Bloggers are not scholars and people who make a living writing partisan commentaries by nature and job description do not produce objective articles and essays. They produce political spin. That is what they do.

By declining to offer any dispute to any....any of them.....you inadvertently admit to exactly what they state.

That, plus the fact that you are well known as a liar.

The whole post disputed the validity of your concept you dingbat. It is discredited by virtue of the fact that you are using subjective articles and sources. Even the people who wrote them would admit to that. You can not take a string of subjective opinions and turn them into an objective conclusion you dope. Nothing you are presenting is fact.

Your post....a farrago of lies and stupidity.
"It is discredited by virtue of the fact that you are using subjective articles and sources."
A lie.
In each case I provide numbers and data, the very definition of objective.

"...a string of subjective opinions..."
Another lie: your stock in trade.

"Nothing you are presenting is fact."
Guess what? Yup....a lie.


Stop begging....sure I'll give you another chance.
I love exposing your lies.
Find any not facts.


The thread, so far:

a. The Obama attempts to flood America with Muslims from the most radicalized areas

b. America long ago deposed the Democrats who enforced racism, and there in no need for big government to shield minorities from....them.

c. ObamaCare fails in so very many ways....including that fact that it causes more health problems for the poor."

d. Obamacare has only reduced the percentage of U.S. residents without health insurance by 2.7 percentage points,

e. There is no was to pay for the expanded welfare state (heading toward $20 trillion) even by confiscating every cent the wealthy have.

f. . The failure of legalizing drugs: More people died of drug overdoses than from automobile accidents (30,196), murders (13,000) or gun accidents (700).”

g. President Reagan's effect on 'poverty:' “Between 1979 and 2010, for instance, the average after-tax income for the poorest quintile of American households rose from $14,800 to $19,200

h. The result of Obama's lack of border security: 121 illegal aliens who had been released by ICE went on to murder Americans.

i. Under Obama, the food stamp program caseloads grew to 47.6 million

j. Obama claims there are lots of prisoners in federal prison for drug use: 'Fewer than 1% of drug offenders sentenced in federal court in 2014 were convicted of simple drug possession'

k. The claim is that illegal aliens are a plus for the economy, via taxes they pay: But unlawful immigrant households paid $39.2 billion in 2010, but received $93.7 billion in government services.”



Waiting.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It appears I've proven my point about the lying gutter snipe, Camp.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liberals rush to minimize the outrageous result of Obama's desire to flood America with unvetted immigrants from radicalized war zones. Their claim is that they really don't cause THAT much mass shooting murders.....there were tons of these mass shootings not involving radicalized Muslims....
....Really?


12) “On Wednesday, a Washington Post article announced that ‘The San Bernardino shooting is the second mass shooting today and the 355th this year.’ Vox, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, this newspaper and others reported similar statistics. Grim details from the church in Charleston, a college classroom in Oregon and a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado are still fresh, but you could be forgiven for wondering how you missed more than 300 other such attacks in 2015. At Mother Jones, where I work as an editor, we have compiled an in-depth, open-source database covering more than three decades of public mass shootings. By our measure, there have been four ‘mass shootings’ this year, including the one in San Bernardino, and at least 73 such attacks since 1982.” -- Mark Follman

Bulletin for the mathematics challenged Liberals: four is considerably less than 355.




How much has Liberal immigration policy changed the nation? The promise was that it wouldn't....

Liberals/Democrats insisted on changing immigration policies in the country, claiming that it would not alter national traditions...
" just after Kennedy’s election to the United States Senate in 1952, he co-sponsored legislation – drafted by Senator Herbert H. Lehman – proposing to recast the nation’s immigration policy. Senator Kennedy subsequently would assume a supporting role in drafting the Refugee-Escapee Act (1957). Two years later he collaborated with Senators Hubert H. Humphrey and Philip A. Hart on the preparation of comprehensive immigration reform legislation. "The Compromise Over Immigration in 1965 that Is to Blame for Much of the Mess Today


13) “As Pew Research cheerfully reports, previous immigrants were ‘almost entirely’ European. But since Kennedy's immigration act, a majority of immigrants have been from Latin America. One-quarter are from Asia. Only 12 percent of post-1965-act immigrants have been from Europe -- and they're probably Muslims.

Apparently, the ‘American experiment’ is actually some kind of sociological trial in which we see if people who have no history of Western government can run a constitutional republic.

As of 1970, there were only 9 million Hispanics in the entire country, according to the Pew Research Center. Today, there are well more than 60 million.”
-- Ann Coulter
15 Stats That Destroy Liberal Narratives


Well, if you hate America....this is what you do.

 

[mamooth]

The Unibomber also declared victory because nobody addressed the points in his manifesto.

PC obviously uses the Unibomber as a role model.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Conservatives have been building the Liberal coffin for several centuries, and yet Liberalism keeps winning and conservatism falls farther and farther behind.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Unibomber also declared victory because nobody addressed the points in his manifesto.

PC obviously uses the Unibomber as a role model.

Well, then....here y'go....

Address any of 'em:

a. The Obama attempts to flood America with Muslims from the most radicalized areas

b. America long ago deposed the Democrats who enforced racism, and there in no need for big government to shield minorities from....them.

c. ObamaCare fails in so very many ways....including that fact that it causes more health problems for the poor."

d. Obamacare has only reduced the percentage of U.S. residents without health insurance by 2.7 percentage points,

e. There is no was to pay for the expanded welfare state (heading toward $20 trillion) even by confiscating every cent the wealthy have.

f. . The failure of legalizing drugs: More people died of drug overdoses than from automobile accidents (30,196), murders (13,000) or gun accidents (700).”

g. President Reagan's effect on 'poverty:' “Between 1979 and 2010, for instance, the average after-tax income for the poorest quintile of American households rose from $14,800 to $19,200

h. The result of Obama's lack of border security: 121 illegal aliens who had been released by ICE went on to murder Americans.

i. Under Obama, the food stamp program caseloads grew to 47.6 million

j. Obama claims there are lots of prisoners in federal prison for drug use: 'Fewer than 1% of drug offenders sentenced in federal court in 2014 were convicted of simple drug possession'

k. The claim is that illegal aliens are a plus for the economy, via taxes they pay: But unlawful immigrant households paid $39.2 billion in 2010, but received $93.7 billion in government services.”

 

[PoliticalChic]

Conservatives have been building the Liberal coffin for several centuries, and yet Liberalism keeps winning and conservatism falls farther and farther behind.

....he said to the hundred million corpses that resulted from big government domination under Liberalism's blood-brother, communism.


Have you ever noticed that Liberalism's party, the Democrats, stand for the same things the communist party did?

Coincidence?



His post serves as proof of Coulter's perception:
"Principle is nothing to liberals. Winning is everything."

 

[PoliticalChic]

And yet another Liberal talking point proven false:

" Why is being black almost always analogized to being gay?.... usually used to highlight how a clear case of bigotry... The notion that people are born wanting to have romantic relationships with their own sex..."
Why is being black almost always analogized to being gay? - Quora



Now to end any cachet that meme might have:

14) “No fewer than eight major studies from around the world have found homosexuality is not a genetic condition.

Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council says that these numerous, rigorous studies of identical twins have now made it impossible to argue that there is a ‘gay gene.’ If homosexuality were inborn and predetermined, then when one identical twin is homosexual, the other should be, as well.

Yet one study from Yale and Columbia Universities found homosexuality common to only 6.7 percent of male identical twins and 5.3 percent of female identical twins.

The low rate of common homosexuality in identical twins – around six percent – is easily explained by nurture, not nature.

Researchers Peter Bearman and Hannah Brueckner concluded that environment was the determining factor. They rejected outright that ‘genetic influence independent of social context’ as the reason for homosexuality. ‘(O)ur results support the hypothesis that less gendered socialization in early childhood and preadolescence shapes subsequent same-sex romantic preferences.’

‘Less gendered socialization’ means, a boy was without a positive father figure, or a girl was without a positive mother figure.

In light of the evidence, Sprigg said simply, ‘No one is born gay.’” -- Mark Hodges



And this:

"In other words, for the minority who may have experimented with gay relationships at some juncture in their lives, well over 80% explicitly renounced homosexual (or even bisexual) self-identification by age of 35. For the clear majority of males (as well as women) who report gay encounters, homosexual activity appears to represent a passing phase, or even a fleeting episode, rather than an unshakable, genetically pre-determined orientation.
Column: Does it matter if only 1.4% of people are gay? - USATODAY.com


Another Liberal myth down the drain.....or, should I say 'buried.'

 

[Maryland Patriot]

[

It is not hyperbole to call Medicaid a disgrace at its annual cost of about $450 billion, and expanding it rather than helping poor people buy private insurance is simply inexplicable.”

Helping poor people buy private insurance?

You mean like giving them subsidies, and having market based exchanges where they could go to buy the private insurance?

lolol

1. "Helping poor people buy private insurance?"

Poor????

"Middle-income as well as low-income people buying coverage in the Exchanges will be eligible for government subsidies that will come in the form of tax credits. Anyone earning between 100 and 400 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) (now $11,490 to $45,960 for a single person, and up to $126, 360 for a family of six) will qualify. - See more at: Under Obamacare, Will You Receive a Subsidy to Help You Buy Your Own Insurance? We Now Have Real Numbers That Will Let You Calculate How Much You Will Receive | Health Beat by Maggie Mahar

2. "Typical American family earned $53,657 last year"
Typical American family earned $53,657 last year



3. Clearly, this isn't aimed at helping 'poor,' but at growing government by collectivization.....

We've seen this before:

a. Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too. Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917 (Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately. Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.


b. Obama isn't the first Bolshevik to support socialized medicine. For context, there was Henry Sigerist: "He devoted himself to the study of history of medicine.Socialized Medicine in the Soviet Union(1937), andHistory of Medicinewere among his most important works. He emerged as a major spokesman for "compulsory health insurance". ...He attacked the American Medical Association because of his conflicting views onsocialized medicine." Henry E. Sigerist - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

c. And, Sigerist was one of the apologists for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. 7 million perished (The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century: Stalin's Forced Famine 1932-33).

d. Sigerist "shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from cradle to grave....[and] Sigerist's belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life."
Fee and Brown, eds. "Making Medical History: The Life and Times of Henry E. Sigerist," p. 252



Notice how this applies to you?
"...apologist for state control over most aspects of human life."

The goal is to provide every American a basic level of healthcare regardless of his or her ability to pay.

Do you oppose that goal?

I oppose that goal if I have to pay for it.
I do not oppose any goal that makes it unlawful to sell a policy to anyone that pays for it out of their own pocket and not mine.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

[

f. . The failure of legalizing drugs: More people died of drug overdoses than from automobile accidents (30,196), murders (13,000) or gun accidents (700).”



.

What drugs has President Obama legalized?

"The Justice Department is set to release about 6,000 inmates early from prison — the largest one-time release of federal prisoners — in an effort to reduce overcrowding and provide relief to drug offenders who received harsh sentences over the past three decades, according to U.S. officials."
Justice Department set to free 6,000 prisoners, largest one-time release

I personally agree with letting those that are in prison for using drugs, out. those caught distributing need to stay in but that's it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

[

f. . The failure of legalizing drugs: More people died of drug overdoses than from automobile accidents (30,196), murders (13,000) or gun accidents (700).”



.

What drugs has President Obama legalized?

"The Justice Department is set to release about 6,000 inmates early from prison — the largest one-time release of federal prisoners — in an effort to reduce overcrowding and provide relief to drug offenders who received harsh sentences over the past three decades, according to U.S. officials."
Justice Department set to free 6,000 prisoners, largest one-time release

I personally agree with letting those that are in prison for using drugs, out. those caught distributing need to stay in but that's it.

"Fewer than 1% of drug offenders sentenced in federal court in 2014 were convicted of simple drug possession,according to the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Most of those possession convictions were plea-bargained down from trafficking charges.” --Heather Mac Donald

 

[PoliticalChic]

I don't know if this last one is even necessary....every thinking American knows that Obama has been a catastrophe for the economy.....


15) “Over the last year, only 1.3 million Americans of working age have entered the workforce, even as the population of this same demographic increased by more than 2.8 million. Just over 1 million members of this group found jobs. That's right -- of the new additions to the working age population, less than four in 10 found jobs.

The newspapers touted the reduction in the unemployment rate to 5.3 percent as a cause for celebration. Yet for every three Americans added to the working age population (16 and older), only around one new job (1.07) has been created under Obama. At this pace, America will soon officially have a zero unemployment rate. But that will only be because no one will be looking for work.” -- Stephen Moore
15 Stats That Destroy Liberal Narratives




So....reality strikes again, in the form of statistics.

And those statistics are nails in the coffin of Liberal lies.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

[

f. . The failure of legalizing drugs: More people died of drug overdoses than from automobile accidents (30,196), murders (13,000) or gun accidents (700).”



.

What drugs has President Obama legalized?

"The Justice Department is set to release about 6,000 inmates early from prison — the largest one-time release of federal prisoners — in an effort to reduce overcrowding and provide relief to drug offenders who received harsh sentences over the past three decades, according to U.S. officials."
Justice Department set to free 6,000 prisoners, largest one-time release

I personally agree with letting those that are in prison for using drugs, out. those caught distributing need to stay in but that's it.

"Fewer than 1% of drug offenders sentenced in federal court in 2014 were convicted of simple drug possession,according to the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Most of those possession convictions were plea-bargained down from trafficking charges.” --Heather Mac Donald

I know, and those that were possession convictions also had other circumstances that came into consideration.

 

[L.K.Eder]

The is that Liberal claim that, somehow, the other side is anti-science, anit-education, or some variation that paints us as 'stooopid.'

But mathematics is the language of science...and that element of mathematics known as statistics, skewers so very many Liberal policies, beliefs, and most closely held views.

The following, a series of talking-point defeats for Liberals....15 of 'em

Let's start:

As one function of the Progressive-Islamist Alliance, one can always expect Leftists to be the first to jump up to support Islamists, no matter what the outrage.
So....they'll hate this stat:

1) "....objective facts, logic and reason must yield to multiculturalist make-believe, “progressive” propaganda and political correctness run amok. Faithful Muslims want to kill you, and faithless progressives seem all too happy to help them along."
Matt Barber - Myth of the ‘Moderate Muslim’

“When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them.”
– The Quran, Surah 9:5

“Muslims account for only about 1 percent of the U.S. population but account for about half of terrorist attacks since 9/11. That means Muslims in the United States are about 5,000 percent more likely to commit terrorist attacks than non-Muslims.” -- Mark Krikorian




Leftists live on the myth that America is racist, and only unrestricted big government can save poor, put-upon minorities.
This is gonna hurt:

2) “... in 1958 a mere 4 percent of Americans approved of interracial marriage. By 2013, that number had grown to 87 percent. In 2012 these once-taboo unions hit an all-time high. Ku Klux Klan membership has shrunk drastically from millions a century ago to fewer than 5,000 today. The Black Panthers are essentially extinct. While plenty of other hate groups have attempted to fill the void, they have always operated on the margins of society. Black politicians are now common—President Obama’s percentage of the white vote was almost perfectly in line with that received by other recent Democrats, all of whom were white.

Granted, these statistics offer but a snapshot of American society, but the more one looks, the more a trend emerges. America is a lot of things; racist isn’t one of them.” -- Greg Jones




The 'liar of the year' authorized the eponymous "ObamaCare," proving, daily, to be a fraud:

3) “The harsh reality awaiting these low-income Americans is undeniable: according to 2013 data from a 2014 Merritt Hawkins study, 55% of doctors already refuse new Medicaid patients. According to the HSC Health Tracking Physician Survey, 2008, the percentage of doctors that refuse new Medicaid patients dwarf by about 8 to 10 times the percentage that refuses new private insurance patients.

Such ‘insurance’ from Obamacare not only fails to provide access to doctors, but research in the top medical journals such as Cancer, American Journal of Cardiology, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation and Annals of Surgery, show that Medicaid beneficiaries suffer worse outcomes than similar patients with private insurance ... all at an added cost of another $800 billion by CBO estimates to taxpayers after the decade.

It is not hyperbole to call Medicaid a disgrace at its annual cost of about $450 billion, and expanding it rather than helping poor people buy private insurance is simply inexplicable.” -- Scott Atlas
15 Stats That Destroy Liberal Narratives


That's just three.
More to come.

get.a.job.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I don't know if this last one is even necessary....every thinking American knows that Obama has been a catastrophe for the economy.....


15) “Over the last year, only 1.3 million Americans of working age have entered the workforce, even as the population of this same demographic increased by more than 2.8 million. Just over 1 million members of this group found jobs. That's right -- of the new additions to the working age population, less than four in 10 found jobs.

The newspapers touted the reduction in the unemployment rate to 5.3 percent as a cause for celebration. Yet for every three Americans added to the working age population (16 and older), only around one new job (1.07) has been created under Obama. At this pace, America will soon officially have a zero unemployment rate. But that will only be because no one will be looking for work.” -- Stephen Moore
15 Stats That Destroy Liberal Narratives




So....reality strikes again, in the form of statistics.

And those statistics are nails in the coffin of Liberal lies.

Prove them accurate.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

I don't know if this last one is even necessary....every thinking American knows that Obama has been a catastrophe for the economy.....


15) “Over the last year, only 1.3 million Americans of working age have entered the workforce, even as the population of this same demographic increased by more than 2.8 million. Just over 1 million members of this group found jobs. That's right -- of the new additions to the working age population, less than four in 10 found jobs.

The newspapers touted the reduction in the unemployment rate to 5.3 percent as a cause for celebration. Yet for every three Americans added to the working age population (16 and older), only around one new job (1.07) has been created under Obama. At this pace, America will soon officially have a zero unemployment rate. But that will only be because no one will be looking for work.” -- Stephen Moore
15 Stats That Destroy Liberal Narratives




So....reality strikes again, in the form of statistics.

And those statistics are nails in the coffin of Liberal lies.

Prove them accurate.

prove them not accurate