"Fingerprint" of Greenland ice melt seen in satellite sea level data

Or, they don't know what they're doing......

The Russians have been drilling through ice for centuries.

It is a documented fact that the Russians had real problems, project stopping problems, drilling for LV.

They are documented by many articles found by searching

Russians Antarctica drilling lake Vostok


Unfortunately the 5 best looking links did not go into great detail other than to say the project had problems and stopped and re-started repeatedly...


Ice in Russia is not AA ice.

AA ice is colder, much colder. Satellites have measured -130F on the surface....

The techniques Russia used to drill through ice in the Arctic did not work.

WHY?
 
The Russians have been drilling through ice for centuries.

It is a documented fact that the Russians had real problems, project stopping problems, drilling for LV.

They are documented by many articles found by searching

Russians Antarctica drilling lake Vostok


Unfortunately the 5 best looking links did not go into great detail other than to say the project had problems and stopped and re-started repeatedly...


Ice in Russia is not AA ice.

AA ice is colder, much colder. Satellites have measured -130F on the surface....

The techniques Russia used to drill through ice in the Arctic did not work.

WHY?

It is a documented fact that the Russians had real problems, project stopping problems, drilling for LV.

They had real problems with a lot of technology.

AA ice is colder, much colder. Satellites have measured -130F on the surface....

What's the measurement 500 feet down?
 
To show "evidence" of ocean rise, the fraud singles out islands next to PROF...

Which are sinking because they are headed under the earth's crust.

From satellite altimeters ... Cite ...

This paper notes, and I'd like to emphasize, this is based on 25 years of data ... which isn't very much ... but when we build our quadratic with this limited data, these are the results they're getting ... 22 inches by year 2100 ... or in prospective, three rows of mason's building blocks ...

One man ... one shovel ... twenty years ... and that protects Houston, Texas from all mean sea level rise for the next century ... way past time to PANIC ...
 
From satellite altimeters ... Cite ...

This paper notes, and I'd like to emphasize, this is based on 25 years of data ... which isn't very much ... but when we build our quadratic with this limited data, these are the results they're getting ... 22 inches by year 2100 ... or in prospective, three rows of mason's building blocks ...

One man ... one shovel ... twenty years ... and that protects Houston, Texas from all mean sea level rise for the next century ... way past time to PANIC ...

$76 trillion!!!
 
The Russians have been drilling through ice for centuries.

It is a documented fact that the Russians had real problems, project stopping problems, drilling for LV.

They are documented by many articles found by searching

Russians Antarctica drilling lake Vostok


Unfortunately the 5 best looking links did not go into great detail other than to say the project had problems and stopped and re-started repeatedly...


Ice in Russia is not AA ice.

AA ice is colder, much colder. Satellites have measured -130F on the surface....

The techniques Russia used to drill through ice in the Arctic did not work.

WHY?

I think you're confusing two facts here ... starting with how ice cores are removed from the ice sheet ... drilling products heat ... lots of heat ... and there's no point in drilling for meltwater ... duh ...

The "-200ºF" factoid is your ruin ... this is dry ice ... the Russians are cryogenically cooling the ice to -200ºF so as to not melt the shit while they drill ...

Your citation was taken down because it was bogus ...
 
From satellite altimeters ... Cite ...

This paper notes, and I'd like to emphasize, this is based on 25 years of data ... which isn't very much ... but when we build our quadratic with this limited data, these are the results they're getting ... 22 inches by year 2100 ... or in prospective, three rows of mason's building blocks ...

One man ... one shovel ... twenty years ... and that protects Houston, Texas from all mean sea level rise for the next century ... way past time to PANIC ...


AA ice growing = no ocean rise

Why your side always resorts to

FUDGE And FRAUD
 
I think you're confusing two facts here ... starting with how ice cores are removed from the ice sheet ... drilling products heat ... lots of heat ... and there's no point in drilling for meltwater ... duh ...

The "-200ºF" factoid is your ruin ... this is dry ice ... the Russians are cryogenically cooling the ice to -200ºF so as to not melt the shit while they drill ...

Your citation was taken down because it was bogus ...



Those are the later attempts.

The first attempt was with a standard drill that works in the Arctic...

Why did that fail?

What temperature is needed to freeze the lubricant?
 
The best "model" of earth climate change is a room with two AC units, Arctic and Antarctic, each with settings

0 = off
10 = maxCOOL

Right now, the arcticAC is set at 1 and the AA AC is set at 9.

What does that mean?

It means

The AA has 9+ times the ice of the Arctic
The AA puts or calves 9 times the ice into the oceans vs Arctic
Air over AA is 50F cooler that Arctic


Air that passes over AA cools more than air that passes over the Arctic, that AC setting.

Not only does AA dwarf Arctic in putting ice in the oceans, the molecular equivalent of 46 times what the Miss dumps I the Gulf, but that ice is much colder, why climate tour boats get stuck in ice there... When an AA iceberg cracks and splits, it exposes the water to unreal cold...

Which of course all boils down to land.

AA 90% of earth ice
Greenland 7%


If we had two polar oceans, earth would have no ice.

If we had two polar continents, two AAs, we would have 80%+++ more ice...



Climate change is all about where land is and where land is moving to and fro.
 
but they haven't yet, so your entire argument is wrong at this time.
So you are saying we can’t know what will happen until it already happens? Because the incremental cooling measured at six solar farms say we can know what will happen.
 
View attachment 715831

Even though the panels may reflect less solar radiation, the photons being converted into electricity more than offset the increased solar radiation absorbed by the lower albedo PV cells. Which is why there was less infrared heat emitted at the solar farms after the panels were installed.
 
This ice melting - sea rising theory is a lot like the COVID debacle we just went through. During COVID, our great President, Donald Trump, said that we need to be sure not to make the remedies worse than the disease. He turned out to be absolutely right. Now it seems like we're making the exact same mistake with global warming. We're abandoning fossil fuels without anything to take their place. That will be the next disaster caused by this administration. But my question is, if Biden and Obama are both climate alarmists, why do they both own mansions on the water? That would make them either dumb or total liars.
 
Last edited:
So you are saying we can’t know what will happen until it already happens? Because the incremental cooling measured at six solar farms say we can know what will happen.
Where did the heat from the electrical energy go?
 
Even though the panels may reflect less solar radiation, the photons being converted into electricity more than offset the increased solar radiation absorbed by the lower albedo PV cells. Which is why there was less infrared heat emitted at the solar farms after the panels were installed.
you still didn't said where the heat from the electricity to the grid goes?
 
Even though the panels may reflect less solar radiation, the photons being converted into electricity more than offset the increased solar radiation absorbed by the lower albedo PV cells. Which is why there was less infrared heat emitted at the solar farms after the panels were installed.

Even though the panels may reflect less solar radiation, the photons being converted into electricity more than offset the increased solar radiation absorbed by the lower albedo PV cells.

How does moving (not destroying) some heat to the point of use "offset" less energy being reflected back to space?
 
AA ice growing = no ocean rise

Why your side always resorts to

FUDGE And FRAUD

Did you read the citation? ... which part of the error analysis do you disagree with? ... that was pretty harsh of the authors the way they dismissed the tidal gauge data ... just brutal ...
 
Did you read the citation? ... which part of the error analysis do you disagree with? ... that was pretty harsh of the authors the way they dismissed the tidal gauge data ... just brutal ...


Did you read the NASA link

90% of earth ice on Antarctica has grown by tens of billions of tons every single year we've measured it.

Your side lies, fudges data, and censors truth.
 

Forum List

Back
Top