Fiscal trouble ahead for most future retirees

Luddly Neddite

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2011
63,947
9,980
2,040
Fiscal trouble ahead for most future retirees - The Washington Post

For the first time since the New Deal, a majority of Americans are headed toward a retirement in which they will be financially worse off than their parents, jeopardizing a long era of improved living standards for the nation’s elderly, according to a growing consensus of new research.

If we let them the GObP/Rs will make this situation a lot worse.
 
Fiscal trouble ahead for most future retirees - The Washington Post

For the first time since the New Deal, a majority of Americans are headed toward a retirement in which they will be financially worse off than their parents, jeopardizing a long era of improved living standards for the nation’s elderly, according to a growing consensus of new research.

If we let them the GObP/Rs will make this situation a lot worse.

too stupid!! Republicans wanted private accounts instead of Social Security into which we would have put 15% of our lifetime income. That means we would have all retired rich ($1.4 million) rather than on the dog food money from SS.

A liberal finds it 100% impossible to think.
 
too stupid!! Republicans wanted private accounts instead of Social Security into which we would have put 15% of our lifetime income. That means we would have all retired rich ($1.4 million) rather than on the dog food money from SS.

A liberal finds it 100% impossible to think.

Another republican who thinks wealth will spontaneously occur in any environment
 
too stupid!! Republicans wanted private accounts instead of Social Security into which we would have put 15% of our lifetime income. That means we would have all retired rich ($1.4 million) rather than on the dog food money from SS.

A liberal finds it 100% impossible to think.

Another republican who thinks wealth will spontaneously occur in any environment

The current 2% ROI we get from SS is easily beaten by investments, which SS is not.
 
Social Security was never meant to be a retirement plan.

Its intention was to prevent destitution among seniors.
 
Fiscal trouble ahead for most future retirees - The Washington Post

For the first time since the New Deal, a majority of Americans are headed toward a retirement in which they will be financially worse off than their parents, jeopardizing a long era of improved living standards for the nation’s elderly, according to a growing consensus of new research.

If we let them the GObP/Rs will make this situation a lot worse.

too stupid!! Republicans wanted private accounts instead of Social Security into which we would have put 15% of our lifetime income. That means we would have all retired rich ($1.4 million) rather than on the dog food money from SS.

A liberal finds it 100% impossible to think.

The Republicans are going to look out for us when we retire? How about they stop screwing us for the 30+ years we make them rich and we'll call it even.
 
Fiscal trouble ahead for most future retirees - The Washington Post



If we let them the GObP/Rs will make this situation a lot worse.

too stupid!! Republicans wanted private accounts instead of Social Security into which we would have put 15% of our lifetime income. That means we would have all retired rich ($1.4 million) rather than on the dog food money from SS.

A liberal finds it 100% impossible to think.

The Republicans are going to look out for us when we retire? .

yes that is why they proposed private accounts that would yield $1.4 million as opposed to the dog food money you get from liberals.
 
Fiscal trouble ahead for most future retirees - The Washington Post

For the first time since the New Deal, a majority of Americans are headed toward a retirement in which they will be financially worse off than their parents, jeopardizing a long era of improved living standards for the nation’s elderly, according to a growing consensus of new research.

If we let them the GObP/Rs will make this situation a lot worse.

Oh yeah.,..let's just automatically blame the GOP. Typical liberal.
 
too stupid!! Republicans wanted private accounts instead of Social Security into which we would have put 15% of our lifetime income. That means we would have all retired rich ($1.4 million) rather than on the dog food money from SS.

A liberal finds it 100% impossible to think.

The Republicans are going to look out for us when we retire? .

yes that is why they proposed private accounts that would yield $1.4 million as opposed to the dog food money you get from liberals.

A government is suppose to protect its citizens all this capitalist system seems to know how to do is exploit the citizens of the United States of America. We are not the work force of the greedy.

Speaking about which. Where is this government when we need it? This is not oil baron's country. This is the founding father's country. The U.S. government gets to define capitalism and this perverted version of it will kill itself if we let it.
 
If private accounts made 100% of inputters into millionaires then I would blame INFLATION. Not the magical wealth genie that only republicans can rub out of the bottle.

figure out what 15% of an average Americans lifetime income comes too!! Capitalism made us all rich, but liberals keep wasting
the money!!
 
Progressives need to move to a country more to their liking

Yes they should race to Cuba. If they get there soon enought maybe they can prevent it from flipping to capitalism like China did!! Pretty soon the whole world will be capitalist and liberals wont get to see en masse liberal starvation anywhere.
 

Forum List

Back
Top