bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,166
- 47,312
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #1,921
Who does rule 230 cover?Nope, it doesn't. So says the FCC and when they say that, it means something. Whereas when you say something, folks just point at you and laugh.Rule 230 covers common carriers, moron.Which is what I said. "you posted it." Which you did with a link to a lawsuit dismissed because they are covered by rule 230.It sure as hell did claim it, moron. I posted the evidence.Nope, they claimed no such thing.They are a common carrier. Facebook claimed in court that it's a common carrier, nimrod.They are not publicly publishing and broadcasting your phone calls, so it is an idiotic attempt at an analogy anyway. Your phone call with your weekend tranny won't affect their other customers or their own image.Cell companies are common carriers. They cannot refuse service to anyone
You Biden dick sucking assholes want it both ways. You want to claim that Facebook can control its content, i.e., function as a publisher, but that it's protected from lawsuits because it's a common carrier.
And why would they since they're not one according to the definition of a common carrier?
Thanks for posting that. It was very helpful to show they are protected by the law.
Section 230, as passed, has two primary parts both listed under §230(c) as the "Good Samaritan" portion of the law. Section 230(c)(1), as identified above, defines that an information service provider shall not be treated as a "publisher or speaker" of information from another provider